PCAR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Deere & has a net margin of 11.8% compared to PACCAR's net margin of 11.5%. PACCAR's return on equity of 27.64% beat Deere &'s return on equity of 31.44%.

PACCAR has a consensus price target of $115.35, signalling upside risk potential of 9.41%. On the other hand Deere & has an analysts' consensus of $464.48 which suggests that it could grow by 7.06%. Given that PACCAR has higher upside potential than Deere &, analysts believe PACCAR is more attractive than Deere &.

PACCAR has a beta of 0.908, which suggesting that the stock is 9.234% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Deere & has a beta of 0.963, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.711%.

PACCAR has a quarterly dividend of $3.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.11%. Deere & offers a yield of 1.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.47 per share. PACCAR pays 33.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Deere & pays out 22.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PACCAR quarterly revenues are $8.2B, which are smaller than Deere & quarterly revenues of $10.8B. PACCAR's net income of $972.1M is lower than Deere &'s net income of $1.2B. Notably, PACCAR's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.78x while Deere &'s PE ratio is 16.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PACCAR is 1.59x versus 2.38x for Deere &. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oshkosh has a net margin of 11.8% compared to PACCAR's net margin of 6.58%. PACCAR's return on equity of 27.64% beat Oshkosh's return on equity of 17.78%.

PACCAR has a consensus price target of $115.35, signalling upside risk potential of 9.41%. On the other hand Oshkosh has an analysts' consensus of $119.30 which suggests that it could grow by 25.2%. Given that Oshkosh has higher upside potential than PACCAR, analysts believe Oshkosh is more attractive than PACCAR.

PACCAR has a beta of 0.908, which suggesting that the stock is 9.234% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oshkosh has a beta of 1.188, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.817%.

PACCAR has a quarterly dividend of $3.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.11%. Oshkosh offers a yield of 1.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share. PACCAR pays 33.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Oshkosh pays out 17.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PACCAR quarterly revenues are $8.2B, which are larger than Oshkosh quarterly revenues of $2.7B. PACCAR's net income of $972.1M is higher than Oshkosh's net income of $180.3M. Notably, PACCAR's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.78x while Oshkosh's PE ratio is 9.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PACCAR is 1.59x versus 0.59x for Oshkosh. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Shyft Group has a net margin of 11.8% compared to PACCAR's net margin of 1.61%. PACCAR's return on equity of 27.64% beat The Shyft Group's return on equity of -1.51%.

PACCAR has a consensus price target of $115.35, signalling upside risk potential of 9.41%. On the other hand The Shyft Group has an analysts' consensus of $15.00 which suggests that it could grow by 28.32%. Given that The Shyft Group has higher upside potential than PACCAR, analysts believe The Shyft Group is more attractive than PACCAR.

PACCAR has a beta of 0.908, which suggesting that the stock is 9.234% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Shyft Group has a beta of 1.633, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.285%.

PACCAR has a quarterly dividend of $3.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.11%. The Shyft Group offers a yield of 1.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. PACCAR pays 33.01% of its earnings as a dividend. The Shyft Group pays out 109.44% of its earnings as a dividend. PACCAR's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but The Shyft Group's is not.

PACCAR quarterly revenues are $8.2B, which are larger than The Shyft Group quarterly revenues of $194.1M. PACCAR's net income of $972.1M is higher than The Shyft Group's net income of $3.1M. Notably, PACCAR's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.78x while The Shyft Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PACCAR is 1.59x versus 0.51x for The Shyft Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Xos has a net margin of 11.8% compared to PACCAR's net margin of -66.57%. PACCAR's return on equity of 27.64% beat Xos's return on equity of -80.19%.

PACCAR has a consensus price target of $115.35, signalling upside risk potential of 9.41%. On the other hand Xos has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 193.68%. Given that Xos has higher upside potential than PACCAR, analysts believe Xos is more attractive than PACCAR.

PACCAR has a beta of 0.908, which suggesting that the stock is 9.234% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xos has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

PACCAR has a quarterly dividend of $3.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.11%. Xos offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PACCAR pays 33.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Xos pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. PACCAR's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PACCAR quarterly revenues are $8.2B, which are larger than Xos quarterly revenues of $15.8M. PACCAR's net income of $972.1M is higher than Xos's net income of -$10.5M. Notably, PACCAR's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.78x while Xos's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PACCAR is 1.59x versus 0.37x for Xos. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.