XOS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Chicago Rivet & Machine has a net margin of -66.57% compared to Xos's net margin of -20.76%. Xos's return on equity of -80.19% beat Chicago Rivet & Machine's return on equity of -13.89%.

Xos has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 198.17%. On the other hand Chicago Rivet & Machine has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Xos has higher upside potential than Chicago Rivet & Machine, analysts believe Xos is more attractive than Chicago Rivet & Machine.

Xos has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chicago Rivet & Machine has a beta of 0.142, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.839%.

Xos has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Chicago Rivet & Machine offers a yield of 2.06% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Xos pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Chicago Rivet & Machine pays out -14.05% of its earnings as a dividend.

Xos quarterly revenues are $15.8M, which are larger than Chicago Rivet & Machine quarterly revenues of $7M. Xos's net income of -$10.5M is lower than Chicago Rivet & Machine's net income of -$1.4M. Notably, Xos's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Chicago Rivet & Machine's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Xos is 0.36x versus 0.52x for Chicago Rivet & Machine. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oshkosh has a net margin of -66.57% compared to Xos's net margin of 6.58%. Xos's return on equity of -80.19% beat Oshkosh's return on equity of 17.78%.

Xos has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 198.17%. On the other hand Oshkosh has an analysts' consensus of $119.30 which suggests that it could grow by 25.2%. Given that Xos has higher upside potential than Oshkosh, analysts believe Xos is more attractive than Oshkosh.

Xos has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oshkosh has a beta of 1.188, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.817%.

Xos has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Oshkosh offers a yield of 1.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share. Xos pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oshkosh pays out 17.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Oshkosh's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Xos quarterly revenues are $15.8M, which are smaller than Oshkosh quarterly revenues of $2.7B. Xos's net income of -$10.5M is lower than Oshkosh's net income of $180.3M. Notably, Xos's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Oshkosh's PE ratio is 9.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Xos is 0.36x versus 0.59x for Oshkosh. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PACCAR has a net margin of -66.57% compared to Xos's net margin of 11.8%. Xos's return on equity of -80.19% beat PACCAR's return on equity of 27.64%.

Xos has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 198.17%. On the other hand PACCAR has an analysts' consensus of $115.35 which suggests that it could grow by 9.41%. Given that Xos has higher upside potential than PACCAR, analysts believe Xos is more attractive than PACCAR.

Xos has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PACCAR has a beta of 0.908, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.234%.

Xos has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. PACCAR offers a yield of 1.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.00 per share. Xos pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PACCAR pays out 33.01% of its earnings as a dividend. PACCAR's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Xos quarterly revenues are $15.8M, which are smaller than PACCAR quarterly revenues of $8.2B. Xos's net income of -$10.5M is lower than PACCAR's net income of $972.1M. Notably, Xos's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while PACCAR's PE ratio is 11.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Xos is 0.36x versus 1.59x for PACCAR. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Shyft Group has a net margin of -66.57% compared to Xos's net margin of 1.61%. Xos's return on equity of -80.19% beat The Shyft Group's return on equity of -1.51%.

Xos has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 198.17%. On the other hand The Shyft Group has an analysts' consensus of $15.00 which suggests that it could grow by 25.84%. Given that Xos has higher upside potential than The Shyft Group, analysts believe Xos is more attractive than The Shyft Group.

Xos has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Shyft Group has a beta of 1.633, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.285%.

Xos has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The Shyft Group offers a yield of 1.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Xos pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Shyft Group pays out 109.44% of its earnings as a dividend.

Xos quarterly revenues are $15.8M, which are smaller than The Shyft Group quarterly revenues of $194.1M. Xos's net income of -$10.5M is lower than The Shyft Group's net income of $3.1M. Notably, Xos's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while The Shyft Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Xos is 0.36x versus 0.52x for The Shyft Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.