Is Diamondback Energy a Good Stock to Buy?
Diamondback Energy (FANG) is a lesser-known diamond in the rough…
Sell
32
SHYF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$9.17
Seasonality move
:
16.04%
Day range:
$9.19 - $9.47
52-week range:
$8.27 - $17.56
Dividend yield:
2.18%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
0.40x
P/B ratio:
1.29x
Volume:
259.9K
Avg. volume:
268.5K
1-year change:
-22.64%
Market cap:
$321M
Revenue:
$786.2M
EPS (TTM):
-$0.09
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SHYF
The Shyft Group
|
$211.9M | $0.13 | 0.55% | -30.95% | $15.50 |
|
BLBD
Blue Bird
|
$308.3M | $0.81 | 0.67% | 20.55% | $53.00 |
|
CMI
Cummins
|
$8.1B | $4.69 | -2.08% | -64.53% | $383.49 |
|
OSK
Oshkosh
|
$2.4B | $2.18 | -4.94% | -24.11% | $127.08 |
|
PCAR
PACCAR
|
$7.5B | $1.70 | -18.5% | -29.56% | $113.22 |
|
XOS
Xos
|
$17.8M | -$1.24 | 35.22% | -42.22% | $10.00 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SHYF
The Shyft Group
|
$9.19 | $15.50 | $321M | -- | $0.05 | 2.18% | 0.40x |
|
BLBD
Blue Bird
|
$34.73 | $53.00 | $1.1B | 10.75x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.86x |
|
CMI
Cummins
|
$330.87 | $383.49 | $45.5B | 11.75x | $1.82 | 2.16% | 1.35x |
|
OSK
Oshkosh
|
$99.12 | $127.08 | $6.4B | 9.58x | $0.51 | 1.91% | 0.61x |
|
PCAR
PACCAR
|
$99.24 | $113.22 | $52.1B | 12.55x | $0.33 | 1.24% | 1.55x |
|
XOS
Xos
|
$3.95 | $10.00 | $31.7M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.44x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SHYF
The Shyft Group
|
34.79% | 2.617 | 32.32% | 0.99x |
|
BLBD
Blue Bird
|
34.3% | 3.611 | 7.57% | 0.65x |
|
CMI
Cummins
|
40.73% | 1.242 | 14.43% | 0.66x |
|
OSK
Oshkosh
|
18.81% | 2.358 | 15.66% | 0.72x |
|
PCAR
PACCAR
|
47.59% | 1.865 | 32.02% | 2.40x |
|
XOS
Xos
|
30.9% | 0.541 | 62.27% | 0.94x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SHYF
The Shyft Group
|
$42.9M | -$3M | -0.79% | -1.12% | -0.56% | $10.7M |
|
BLBD
Blue Bird
|
$60.3M | $33M | 46.01% | 82.17% | 11.96% | $21.8M |
|
CMI
Cummins
|
$2B | $664M | 22.19% | 37.07% | 8.89% | $882M |
|
OSK
Oshkosh
|
$447.3M | $223.9M | 13.18% | 17.29% | 8.87% | $703.3M |
|
PCAR
PACCAR
|
$1.5B | $1B | 12.95% | 24.02% | 12.72% | $942.8M |
|
XOS
Xos
|
$2.9M | -$9.7M | -56.33% | -80.19% | -61.37% | -$11.7M |
The Shyft Group vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns SHYF or BLBD?
Blue Bird has a net margin of -1.69% compared to The Shyft Group's net margin of 9.15%. The Shyft Group's return on equity of -1.12% beat Blue Bird's return on equity of 82.17%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SHYFThe Shyft Group21.31% -$0.10 $380.8M BLBDBlue Bird19.22% $0.86 $273.5M -
What do Analysts Say About SHYF or BLBD?
The Shyft Group has a consensus price target of $15.50, signalling upside risk potential of 68.66%. On the other hand Blue Bird has an analysts' consensus of $53.00 which suggests that it could grow by 52.61%. Given that The Shyft Group has higher upside potential than Blue Bird, analysts believe The Shyft Group is more attractive than Blue Bird.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SHYFThe Shyft Group1 1 0 BLBDBlue Bird4 1 0 -
Is SHYF or BLBD More Risky?
The Shyft Group has a beta of 1.690, which suggesting that the stock is 69.01% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Blue Bird has a beta of 1.577, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.707%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SHYF or BLBD?
The Shyft Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.18%. Blue Bird offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. The Shyft Group pays -249.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Blue Bird pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SHYF or BLBD?
The Shyft Group quarterly revenues are $201.4M, which are smaller than Blue Bird quarterly revenues of $313.9M. The Shyft Group's net income of -$3.4M is lower than Blue Bird's net income of $28.7M. Notably, The Shyft Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Blue Bird's PE ratio is 10.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Shyft Group is 0.40x versus 0.86x for Blue Bird. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SHYFThe Shyft Group0.40x -- $201.4M -$3.4M BLBDBlue Bird0.86x 10.75x $313.9M $28.7M
-
Which has Higher Returns SHYF or CMI?
Cummins has a net margin of -1.69% compared to The Shyft Group's net margin of 4.95%. The Shyft Group's return on equity of -1.12% beat Cummins's return on equity of 37.07%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SHYFThe Shyft Group21.31% -$0.10 $380.8M CMICummins24.08% $3.02 $18.4B -
What do Analysts Say About SHYF or CMI?
The Shyft Group has a consensus price target of $15.50, signalling upside risk potential of 68.66%. On the other hand Cummins has an analysts' consensus of $383.49 which suggests that it could grow by 15.91%. Given that The Shyft Group has higher upside potential than Cummins, analysts believe The Shyft Group is more attractive than Cummins.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SHYFThe Shyft Group1 1 0 CMICummins6 14 0 -
Is SHYF or CMI More Risky?
The Shyft Group has a beta of 1.690, which suggesting that the stock is 69.01% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cummins has a beta of 1.012, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.2%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SHYF or CMI?
The Shyft Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.18%. Cummins offers a yield of 2.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.82 per share. The Shyft Group pays -249.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Cummins pays out 24.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Cummins's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SHYF or CMI?
The Shyft Group quarterly revenues are $201.4M, which are smaller than Cummins quarterly revenues of $8.4B. The Shyft Group's net income of -$3.4M is lower than Cummins's net income of $418M. Notably, The Shyft Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Cummins's PE ratio is 11.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Shyft Group is 0.40x versus 1.35x for Cummins. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SHYFThe Shyft Group0.40x -- $201.4M -$3.4M CMICummins1.35x 11.75x $8.4B $418M
-
Which has Higher Returns SHYF or OSK?
Oshkosh has a net margin of -1.69% compared to The Shyft Group's net margin of 5.89%. The Shyft Group's return on equity of -1.12% beat Oshkosh's return on equity of 17.29%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SHYFThe Shyft Group21.31% -$0.10 $380.8M OSKOshkosh17.22% $2.33 $5.1B -
What do Analysts Say About SHYF or OSK?
The Shyft Group has a consensus price target of $15.50, signalling upside risk potential of 68.66%. On the other hand Oshkosh has an analysts' consensus of $127.08 which suggests that it could grow by 28.21%. Given that The Shyft Group has higher upside potential than Oshkosh, analysts believe The Shyft Group is more attractive than Oshkosh.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SHYFThe Shyft Group1 1 0 OSKOshkosh7 7 0 -
Is SHYF or OSK More Risky?
The Shyft Group has a beta of 1.690, which suggesting that the stock is 69.01% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oshkosh has a beta of 1.211, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.053%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SHYF or OSK?
The Shyft Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.18%. Oshkosh offers a yield of 1.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share. The Shyft Group pays -249.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Oshkosh pays out 17.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Oshkosh's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SHYF or OSK?
The Shyft Group quarterly revenues are $201.4M, which are smaller than Oshkosh quarterly revenues of $2.6B. The Shyft Group's net income of -$3.4M is lower than Oshkosh's net income of $153.1M. Notably, The Shyft Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Oshkosh's PE ratio is 9.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Shyft Group is 0.40x versus 0.61x for Oshkosh. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SHYFThe Shyft Group0.40x -- $201.4M -$3.4M OSKOshkosh0.61x 9.58x $2.6B $153.1M
-
Which has Higher Returns SHYF or PCAR?
PACCAR has a net margin of -1.69% compared to The Shyft Group's net margin of 11.03%. The Shyft Group's return on equity of -1.12% beat PACCAR's return on equity of 24.02%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SHYFThe Shyft Group21.31% -$0.10 $380.8M PCARPACCAR18.6% $1.66 $33.4B -
What do Analysts Say About SHYF or PCAR?
The Shyft Group has a consensus price target of $15.50, signalling upside risk potential of 68.66%. On the other hand PACCAR has an analysts' consensus of $113.22 which suggests that it could grow by 14.09%. Given that The Shyft Group has higher upside potential than PACCAR, analysts believe The Shyft Group is more attractive than PACCAR.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SHYFThe Shyft Group1 1 0 PCARPACCAR5 13 1 -
Is SHYF or PCAR More Risky?
The Shyft Group has a beta of 1.690, which suggesting that the stock is 69.01% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PACCAR has a beta of 0.913, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.71%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SHYF or PCAR?
The Shyft Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.18%. PACCAR offers a yield of 1.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share. The Shyft Group pays -249.59% of its earnings as a dividend. PACCAR pays out 54.99% of its earnings as a dividend. PACCAR's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SHYF or PCAR?
The Shyft Group quarterly revenues are $201.4M, which are smaller than PACCAR quarterly revenues of $7.9B. The Shyft Group's net income of -$3.4M is lower than PACCAR's net income of $872M. Notably, The Shyft Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while PACCAR's PE ratio is 12.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Shyft Group is 0.40x versus 1.55x for PACCAR. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SHYFThe Shyft Group0.40x -- $201.4M -$3.4M PCARPACCAR1.55x 12.55x $7.9B $872M
-
Which has Higher Returns SHYF or XOS?
Xos has a net margin of -1.69% compared to The Shyft Group's net margin of -66.57%. The Shyft Group's return on equity of -1.12% beat Xos's return on equity of -80.19%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SHYFThe Shyft Group21.31% -$0.10 $380.8M XOSXos18.14% -$1.32 $73.6M -
What do Analysts Say About SHYF or XOS?
The Shyft Group has a consensus price target of $15.50, signalling upside risk potential of 68.66%. On the other hand Xos has an analysts' consensus of $10.00 which suggests that it could grow by 153.17%. Given that Xos has higher upside potential than The Shyft Group, analysts believe Xos is more attractive than The Shyft Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SHYFThe Shyft Group1 1 0 XOSXos1 1 0 -
Is SHYF or XOS More Risky?
The Shyft Group has a beta of 1.690, which suggesting that the stock is 69.01% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xos has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SHYF or XOS?
The Shyft Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.18%. Xos offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. The Shyft Group pays -249.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Xos pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SHYF or XOS?
The Shyft Group quarterly revenues are $201.4M, which are larger than Xos quarterly revenues of $15.8M. The Shyft Group's net income of -$3.4M is higher than Xos's net income of -$10.5M. Notably, The Shyft Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Xos's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Shyft Group is 0.40x versus 0.44x for Xos. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SHYFThe Shyft Group0.40x -- $201.4M -$3.4M XOSXos0.44x -- $15.8M -$10.5M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
What Is Hindsight Bias In Investing?
You’ve probably heard the expression “hindsight is 20/20.” That saying…
Is Rivian a Good Stock a Buy?
Rivian Automotive (RIVN) had an initial IPO of close to…
Stock Ideas
Buy
58
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 41x
Buy
53
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 33x
Alerts
Sell
29
UNF alert for Mar 26
UniFirst [UNF] is up 0.24% over the past day.
Sell
30
KEQU alert for Mar 26
Kewaunee Scientific [KEQU] is down 1.45% over the past day.
Buy
82
EPAC alert for Mar 26
Enerpac Tool Group [EPAC] is down 3.19% over the past day.
