CMI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Greenbrier Companies has a net margin of 4.95% compared to Cummins's net margin of 6.31%. Cummins's return on equity of 37.07% beat Greenbrier Companies's return on equity of 11.9%.

Cummins has a consensus price target of $385.69, signalling upside risk potential of 19.57%. On the other hand Greenbrier Companies has an analysts' consensus of $68.50 which suggests that it could grow by 27.21%. Given that Greenbrier Companies has higher upside potential than Cummins, analysts believe Greenbrier Companies is more attractive than Cummins.

Cummins has a beta of 1.012, which suggesting that the stock is 1.2% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Greenbrier Companies has a beta of 1.628, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.752%.

Cummins has a quarterly dividend of $1.82 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.21%. Greenbrier Companies offers a yield of 2.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Cummins pays 24.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Greenbrier Companies pays out 23.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cummins quarterly revenues are $8.4B, which are larger than Greenbrier Companies quarterly revenues of $875.9M. Cummins's net income of $418M is higher than Greenbrier Companies's net income of $55.3M. Notably, Cummins's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.45x while Greenbrier Companies's PE ratio is 9.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cummins is 1.32x versus 0.48x for Greenbrier Companies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hydrogen Engine Center has a net margin of 4.95% compared to Cummins's net margin of --. Cummins's return on equity of 37.07% beat Hydrogen Engine Center's return on equity of --.

Cummins has a consensus price target of $385.69, signalling upside risk potential of 19.57%. On the other hand Hydrogen Engine Center has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Cummins has higher upside potential than Hydrogen Engine Center, analysts believe Cummins is more attractive than Hydrogen Engine Center.

Cummins has a beta of 1.012, which suggesting that the stock is 1.2% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hydrogen Engine Center has a beta of 22.240, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2124.012%.

Cummins has a quarterly dividend of $1.82 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.21%. Hydrogen Engine Center offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cummins pays 24.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Hydrogen Engine Center pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cummins's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cummins quarterly revenues are $8.4B, which are larger than Hydrogen Engine Center quarterly revenues of --. Cummins's net income of $418M is higher than Hydrogen Engine Center's net income of --. Notably, Cummins's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.45x while Hydrogen Engine Center's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cummins is 1.32x versus -- for Hydrogen Engine Center. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies has a net margin of 4.95% compared to Cummins's net margin of 8.21%. Cummins's return on equity of 37.07% beat Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies's return on equity of 10.16%.

Cummins has a consensus price target of $385.69, signalling upside risk potential of 19.57%. On the other hand Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $215.12 which suggests that it could grow by 18.29%. Given that Cummins has higher upside potential than Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies, analysts believe Cummins is more attractive than Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies.

Cummins has a beta of 1.012, which suggesting that the stock is 1.2% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies has a beta of 1.306, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.649%.

Cummins has a quarterly dividend of $1.82 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.21%. Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies offers a yield of 0.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Cummins pays 24.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies pays out 13.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cummins quarterly revenues are $8.4B, which are larger than Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies quarterly revenues of $2.6B. Cummins's net income of $418M is higher than Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies's net income of $212M. Notably, Cummins's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.45x while Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies's PE ratio is 30.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cummins is 1.32x versus 3.06x for Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wabash National has a net margin of 4.95% compared to Cummins's net margin of -0.25%. Cummins's return on equity of 37.07% beat Wabash National's return on equity of -69.69%.

Cummins has a consensus price target of $385.69, signalling upside risk potential of 19.57%. On the other hand Wabash National has an analysts' consensus of $18.50 which suggests that it could grow by 67.27%. Given that Wabash National has higher upside potential than Cummins, analysts believe Wabash National is more attractive than Cummins.

Cummins has a beta of 1.012, which suggesting that the stock is 1.2% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wabash National has a beta of 1.641, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 64.094%.

Cummins has a quarterly dividend of $1.82 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.21%. Wabash National offers a yield of 3.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Cummins pays 24.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Wabash National pays out -5.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Cummins's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cummins quarterly revenues are $8.4B, which are larger than Wabash National quarterly revenues of $416.8M. Cummins's net income of $418M is higher than Wabash National's net income of -$1M. Notably, Cummins's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.45x while Wabash National's PE ratio is 5.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cummins is 1.32x versus 0.25x for Wabash National. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.