CMI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Emerson Electric has a net margin of 9.57% compared to Cummins's net margin of 21.56%. Cummins's return on equity of 19.56% beat Emerson Electric's return on equity of 7.34%.

Cummins has a consensus price target of $377.16, signalling upside risk potential of 7.41%. On the other hand Emerson Electric has an analysts' consensus of $140.37 which suggests that it could grow by 13.27%. Given that Emerson Electric has higher upside potential than Cummins, analysts believe Emerson Electric is more attractive than Cummins.

Cummins has a beta of 0.992, which suggesting that the stock is 0.752% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Emerson Electric has a beta of 1.341, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.059%.

Cummins has a quarterly dividend of $1.82 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.95%. Emerson Electric offers a yield of 1.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.53 per share. Cummins pays 125.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Emerson Electric pays out 61.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Emerson Electric's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Cummins's is not.

Cummins quarterly revenues are $8.5B, which are larger than Emerson Electric quarterly revenues of $4.6B. Cummins's net income of $809M is lower than Emerson Electric's net income of $996M. Notably, Cummins's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.30x while Emerson Electric's PE ratio is 36.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cummins is 1.44x versus 4.07x for Emerson Electric. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hydrogen Engine Center has a net margin of 9.57% compared to Cummins's net margin of --. Cummins's return on equity of 19.56% beat Hydrogen Engine Center's return on equity of --.

Cummins has a consensus price target of $377.16, signalling upside risk potential of 7.41%. On the other hand Hydrogen Engine Center has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Cummins has higher upside potential than Hydrogen Engine Center, analysts believe Cummins is more attractive than Hydrogen Engine Center.

Cummins has a beta of 0.992, which suggesting that the stock is 0.752% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hydrogen Engine Center has a beta of 20.670, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1967.037%.

Cummins has a quarterly dividend of $1.82 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.95%. Hydrogen Engine Center offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cummins pays 125.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Hydrogen Engine Center pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cummins quarterly revenues are $8.5B, which are larger than Hydrogen Engine Center quarterly revenues of --. Cummins's net income of $809M is higher than Hydrogen Engine Center's net income of --. Notably, Cummins's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.30x while Hydrogen Engine Center's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cummins is 1.44x versus -- for Hydrogen Engine Center. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Twin Disc has a net margin of 9.57% compared to Cummins's net margin of -3.79%. Cummins's return on equity of 19.56% beat Twin Disc's return on equity of 6.3%.

Cummins has a consensus price target of $377.16, signalling upside risk potential of 7.41%. On the other hand Twin Disc has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 31.58%. Given that Twin Disc has higher upside potential than Cummins, analysts believe Twin Disc is more attractive than Cummins.

Cummins has a beta of 0.992, which suggesting that the stock is 0.752% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Twin Disc has a beta of 0.629, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.147%.

Cummins has a quarterly dividend of $1.82 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.95%. Twin Disc offers a yield of 1.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Cummins pays 125.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Twin Disc pays out 15.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Twin Disc's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Cummins's is not.

Cummins quarterly revenues are $8.5B, which are larger than Twin Disc quarterly revenues of $72.9M. Cummins's net income of $809M is higher than Twin Disc's net income of -$2.8M. Notably, Cummins's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.30x while Twin Disc's PE ratio is 17.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cummins is 1.44x versus 0.52x for Twin Disc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies has a net margin of 9.57% compared to Cummins's net margin of 10.63%. Cummins's return on equity of 19.56% beat Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies's return on equity of 10.14%.

Cummins has a consensus price target of $377.16, signalling upside risk potential of 7.41%. On the other hand Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $219.78 which suggests that it could grow by 14.8%. Given that Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies has higher upside potential than Cummins, analysts believe Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies is more attractive than Cummins.

Cummins has a beta of 0.992, which suggesting that the stock is 0.752% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies has a beta of 1.258, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.752%.

Cummins has a quarterly dividend of $1.82 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.95%. Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies offers a yield of 0.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Cummins pays 125.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies pays out 15.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Cummins's is not.

Cummins quarterly revenues are $8.5B, which are larger than Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies quarterly revenues of $2.7B. Cummins's net income of $809M is higher than Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies's net income of $283M. Notably, Cummins's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.30x while Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies's PE ratio is 31.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cummins is 1.44x versus 3.27x for Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.