IRM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Invitation Homes has a net margin of 6.57% compared to Iron Mountain's net margin of 21.71%. Iron Mountain's return on equity of 236.21% beat Invitation Homes's return on equity of 4.52%.

Iron Mountain has a consensus price target of $113.78, signalling upside risk potential of 29.71%. On the other hand Invitation Homes has an analysts' consensus of $36.68 which suggests that it could grow by 8.59%. Given that Iron Mountain has higher upside potential than Invitation Homes, analysts believe Iron Mountain is more attractive than Invitation Homes.

Iron Mountain has a beta of 0.978, which suggesting that the stock is 2.188% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invitation Homes has a beta of 0.863, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.722%.

Iron Mountain has a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.27%. Invitation Homes offers a yield of 3.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. Iron Mountain pays 438.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Invitation Homes pays out 151.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Iron Mountain quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are larger than Invitation Homes quarterly revenues of $659.1M. Iron Mountain's net income of $103.9M is lower than Invitation Homes's net income of $143.1M. Notably, Iron Mountain's price-to-earnings ratio is 143.80x while Invitation Homes's PE ratio is 46.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Iron Mountain is 4.21x versus 7.91x for Invitation Homes. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

KKR Real Estate Finance Trust has a net margin of 6.57% compared to Iron Mountain's net margin of -16.41%. Iron Mountain's return on equity of 236.21% beat KKR Real Estate Finance Trust's return on equity of 2.42%.

Iron Mountain has a consensus price target of $113.78, signalling upside risk potential of 29.71%. On the other hand KKR Real Estate Finance Trust has an analysts' consensus of $10.90 which suggests that it could grow by 22.75%. Given that Iron Mountain has higher upside potential than KKR Real Estate Finance Trust, analysts believe Iron Mountain is more attractive than KKR Real Estate Finance Trust.

Iron Mountain has a beta of 0.978, which suggesting that the stock is 2.188% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KKR Real Estate Finance Trust has a beta of 0.886, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.434%.

Iron Mountain has a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.27%. KKR Real Estate Finance Trust offers a yield of 11.26% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Iron Mountain pays 438.25% of its earnings as a dividend. KKR Real Estate Finance Trust pays out 289.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Iron Mountain quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are larger than KKR Real Estate Finance Trust quarterly revenues of $29.6M. Iron Mountain's net income of $103.9M is higher than KKR Real Estate Finance Trust's net income of -$4.9M. Notably, Iron Mountain's price-to-earnings ratio is 143.80x while KKR Real Estate Finance Trust's PE ratio is 55.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Iron Mountain is 4.21x versus 4.23x for KKR Real Estate Finance Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lamar Advertising has a net margin of 6.57% compared to Iron Mountain's net margin of -0.21%. Iron Mountain's return on equity of 236.21% beat Lamar Advertising's return on equity of 30.88%.

Iron Mountain has a consensus price target of $113.78, signalling upside risk potential of 29.71%. On the other hand Lamar Advertising has an analysts' consensus of $129.80 which suggests that it could grow by 15.77%. Given that Iron Mountain has higher upside potential than Lamar Advertising, analysts believe Iron Mountain is more attractive than Lamar Advertising.

Iron Mountain has a beta of 0.978, which suggesting that the stock is 2.188% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lamar Advertising has a beta of 1.339, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.853%.

Iron Mountain has a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.27%. Lamar Advertising offers a yield of 5.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.55 per share. Iron Mountain pays 438.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Lamar Advertising pays out 160.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Iron Mountain quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are larger than Lamar Advertising quarterly revenues of $579.6M. Iron Mountain's net income of $103.9M is higher than Lamar Advertising's net income of -$1.2M. Notably, Iron Mountain's price-to-earnings ratio is 143.80x while Lamar Advertising's PE ratio is 31.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Iron Mountain is 4.21x versus 5.21x for Lamar Advertising. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PotlatchDeltic has a net margin of 6.57% compared to Iron Mountain's net margin of 2.01%. Iron Mountain's return on equity of 236.21% beat PotlatchDeltic's return on equity of 1.04%.

Iron Mountain has a consensus price target of $113.78, signalling upside risk potential of 29.71%. On the other hand PotlatchDeltic has an analysts' consensus of $50.13 which suggests that it could grow by 28.26%. Given that Iron Mountain has higher upside potential than PotlatchDeltic, analysts believe Iron Mountain is more attractive than PotlatchDeltic.

Iron Mountain has a beta of 0.978, which suggesting that the stock is 2.188% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PotlatchDeltic has a beta of 1.125, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.539%.

Iron Mountain has a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.27%. PotlatchDeltic offers a yield of 4.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Iron Mountain pays 438.25% of its earnings as a dividend. PotlatchDeltic pays out 650.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Iron Mountain quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are larger than PotlatchDeltic quarterly revenues of $258.1M. Iron Mountain's net income of $103.9M is higher than PotlatchDeltic's net income of $5.2M. Notably, Iron Mountain's price-to-earnings ratio is 143.80x while PotlatchDeltic's PE ratio is 141.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Iron Mountain is 4.21x versus 2.92x for PotlatchDeltic. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.