LAMR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Iron Mountain has a net margin of -0.21% compared to Lamar Advertising's net margin of 6.57%. Lamar Advertising's return on equity of 30.88% beat Iron Mountain's return on equity of 236.21%.

Lamar Advertising has a consensus price target of $132.60, signalling upside risk potential of 17.34%. On the other hand Iron Mountain has an analysts' consensus of $113.78 which suggests that it could grow by 36.36%. Given that Iron Mountain has higher upside potential than Lamar Advertising, analysts believe Iron Mountain is more attractive than Lamar Advertising.

Lamar Advertising has a beta of 1.339, which suggesting that the stock is 33.853% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Iron Mountain has a beta of 0.978, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.188%.

Lamar Advertising has a quarterly dividend of $1.55 per share corresponding to a yield of 5%. Iron Mountain offers a yield of 3.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share. Lamar Advertising pays 160.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Iron Mountain pays out 438.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lamar Advertising quarterly revenues are $579.6M, which are smaller than Iron Mountain quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Lamar Advertising's net income of -$1.2M is lower than Iron Mountain's net income of $103.9M. Notably, Lamar Advertising's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.01x while Iron Mountain's PE ratio is 136.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lamar Advertising is 5.25x versus 4.01x for Iron Mountain. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Outfront Media has a net margin of -0.21% compared to Lamar Advertising's net margin of 15%. Lamar Advertising's return on equity of 30.88% beat Outfront Media's return on equity of 34.87%.

Lamar Advertising has a consensus price target of $132.60, signalling upside risk potential of 17.34%. On the other hand Outfront Media has an analysts' consensus of $20.42 which suggests that it could grow by 40.99%. Given that Outfront Media has higher upside potential than Lamar Advertising, analysts believe Outfront Media is more attractive than Lamar Advertising.

Lamar Advertising has a beta of 1.339, which suggesting that the stock is 33.853% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Outfront Media has a beta of 1.799, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 79.871%.

Lamar Advertising has a quarterly dividend of $1.55 per share corresponding to a yield of 5%. Outfront Media offers a yield of 6.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Lamar Advertising pays 160.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Outfront Media pays out 80.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Outfront Media's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Lamar Advertising's is not.

Lamar Advertising quarterly revenues are $579.6M, which are larger than Outfront Media quarterly revenues of $493.2M. Lamar Advertising's net income of -$1.2M is lower than Outfront Media's net income of $74M. Notably, Lamar Advertising's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.01x while Outfront Media's PE ratio is 9.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lamar Advertising is 5.25x versus 1.29x for Outfront Media. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PotlatchDeltic has a net margin of -0.21% compared to Lamar Advertising's net margin of 2.01%. Lamar Advertising's return on equity of 30.88% beat PotlatchDeltic's return on equity of 1.04%.

Lamar Advertising has a consensus price target of $132.60, signalling upside risk potential of 17.34%. On the other hand PotlatchDeltic has an analysts' consensus of $50.38 which suggests that it could grow by 29.33%. Given that PotlatchDeltic has higher upside potential than Lamar Advertising, analysts believe PotlatchDeltic is more attractive than Lamar Advertising.

Lamar Advertising has a beta of 1.339, which suggesting that the stock is 33.853% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PotlatchDeltic has a beta of 1.125, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.539%.

Lamar Advertising has a quarterly dividend of $1.55 per share corresponding to a yield of 5%. PotlatchDeltic offers a yield of 4.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Lamar Advertising pays 160.06% of its earnings as a dividend. PotlatchDeltic pays out 650.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lamar Advertising quarterly revenues are $579.6M, which are larger than PotlatchDeltic quarterly revenues of $258.1M. Lamar Advertising's net income of -$1.2M is lower than PotlatchDeltic's net income of $5.2M. Notably, Lamar Advertising's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.01x while PotlatchDeltic's PE ratio is 141.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lamar Advertising is 5.25x versus 2.91x for PotlatchDeltic. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust has a net margin of -0.21% compared to Lamar Advertising's net margin of 66.66%. Lamar Advertising's return on equity of 30.88% beat PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust's return on equity of 8.27%.

Lamar Advertising has a consensus price target of $132.60, signalling upside risk potential of 17.34%. On the other hand PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust has an analysts' consensus of $14.43 which suggests that it could grow by 18.36%. Given that PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust has higher upside potential than Lamar Advertising, analysts believe PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust is more attractive than Lamar Advertising.

Lamar Advertising has a beta of 1.339, which suggesting that the stock is 33.853% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust has a beta of 1.170, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.955%.

Lamar Advertising has a quarterly dividend of $1.55 per share corresponding to a yield of 5%. PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust offers a yield of 13.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Lamar Advertising pays 160.06% of its earnings as a dividend. PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust pays out 112.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lamar Advertising quarterly revenues are $579.6M, which are larger than PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust quarterly revenues of $69.8M. Lamar Advertising's net income of -$1.2M is lower than PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust's net income of $46.5M. Notably, Lamar Advertising's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.01x while PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust's PE ratio is 9.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lamar Advertising is 5.25x versus 6.17x for PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.