EQIX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Invitation Homes has a net margin of 13.49% compared to Equinix's net margin of 14.43%. Equinix's return on equity of 8.43% beat Invitation Homes's return on equity of 4.35%.

Equinix has a consensus price target of $1,003.00, signalling upside risk potential of 8.17%. On the other hand Invitation Homes has an analysts' consensus of $37.77 which suggests that it could grow by 17.53%. Given that Invitation Homes has higher upside potential than Equinix, analysts believe Invitation Homes is more attractive than Equinix.

Equinix has a beta of 0.724, which suggesting that the stock is 27.615% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invitation Homes has a beta of 1.035, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.488%.

Equinix has a quarterly dividend of $4.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.84%. Invitation Homes offers a yield of 4.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Equinix pays 141.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Invitation Homes pays out 122.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Equinix quarterly revenues are $2.2B, which are larger than Invitation Homes quarterly revenues of $660.3M. Equinix's net income of $297M is higher than Invitation Homes's net income of $95.3M. Notably, Equinix's price-to-earnings ratio is 83.61x while Invitation Homes's PE ratio is 45.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Equinix is 10.27x versus 7.63x for Invitation Homes. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Iron Mountain has a net margin of 13.49% compared to Equinix's net margin of -2.16%. Equinix's return on equity of 8.43% beat Iron Mountain's return on equity of 50.64%.

Equinix has a consensus price target of $1,003.00, signalling upside risk potential of 8.17%. On the other hand Iron Mountain has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 16.44%. Given that Iron Mountain has higher upside potential than Equinix, analysts believe Iron Mountain is more attractive than Equinix.

Equinix has a beta of 0.724, which suggesting that the stock is 27.615% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Iron Mountain has a beta of 0.989, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.127%.

Equinix has a quarterly dividend of $4.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.84%. Iron Mountain offers a yield of 2.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.72 per share. Equinix pays 141.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Iron Mountain pays out 400.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Equinix quarterly revenues are $2.2B, which are larger than Iron Mountain quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Equinix's net income of $297M is higher than Iron Mountain's net income of -$33.6M. Notably, Equinix's price-to-earnings ratio is 83.61x while Iron Mountain's PE ratio is 291.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Equinix is 10.27x versus 5.18x for Iron Mountain. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lamar Advertising has a net margin of 13.49% compared to Equinix's net margin of 26.14%. Equinix's return on equity of 8.43% beat Lamar Advertising's return on equity of 42.69%.

Equinix has a consensus price target of $1,003.00, signalling upside risk potential of 8.17%. On the other hand Lamar Advertising has an analysts' consensus of $133.95 which suggests that it could grow by 8.91%. Given that Lamar Advertising has higher upside potential than Equinix, analysts believe Lamar Advertising is more attractive than Equinix.

Equinix has a beta of 0.724, which suggesting that the stock is 27.615% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lamar Advertising has a beta of 1.503, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.271%.

Equinix has a quarterly dividend of $4.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.84%. Lamar Advertising offers a yield of 4.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.65 per share. Equinix pays 141.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Lamar Advertising pays out 103% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Equinix quarterly revenues are $2.2B, which are larger than Lamar Advertising quarterly revenues of $564.1M. Equinix's net income of $297M is higher than Lamar Advertising's net income of $147.5M. Notably, Equinix's price-to-earnings ratio is 83.61x while Lamar Advertising's PE ratio is 24.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Equinix is 10.27x versus 5.77x for Lamar Advertising. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PotlatchDeltic has a net margin of 13.49% compared to Equinix's net margin of 1.3%. Equinix's return on equity of 8.43% beat PotlatchDeltic's return on equity of 0.77%.

Equinix has a consensus price target of $1,003.00, signalling upside risk potential of 8.17%. On the other hand PotlatchDeltic has an analysts' consensus of $51.71 which suggests that it could grow by 31.85%. Given that PotlatchDeltic has higher upside potential than Equinix, analysts believe PotlatchDeltic is more attractive than Equinix.

Equinix has a beta of 0.724, which suggesting that the stock is 27.615% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PotlatchDeltic has a beta of 1.148, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.835%.

Equinix has a quarterly dividend of $4.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.84%. PotlatchDeltic offers a yield of 4.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Equinix pays 141.79% of its earnings as a dividend. PotlatchDeltic pays out 231.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Equinix quarterly revenues are $2.2B, which are larger than PotlatchDeltic quarterly revenues of $255.1M. Equinix's net income of $297M is higher than PotlatchDeltic's net income of $3.3M. Notably, Equinix's price-to-earnings ratio is 83.61x while PotlatchDeltic's PE ratio is 189.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Equinix is 10.27x versus 2.92x for PotlatchDeltic. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.