INVH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Innovative Industrial Properties has a net margin of 21.71% compared to Invitation Homes's net margin of 52.15%. Invitation Homes's return on equity of 4.52% beat Innovative Industrial Properties's return on equity of 8.3%.

Invitation Homes has a consensus price target of $36.86, signalling upside risk potential of 16.51%. On the other hand Innovative Industrial Properties has an analysts' consensus of $71.00 which suggests that it could grow by 45.79%. Given that Innovative Industrial Properties has higher upside potential than Invitation Homes, analysts believe Innovative Industrial Properties is more attractive than Invitation Homes.

Invitation Homes has a beta of 0.863, which suggesting that the stock is 13.722% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Innovative Industrial Properties has a beta of 1.590, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.015%.

Invitation Homes has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.6%. Innovative Industrial Properties offers a yield of 15.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.90 per share. Invitation Homes pays 151.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Innovative Industrial Properties pays out 132.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Invitation Homes quarterly revenues are $659.1M, which are larger than Innovative Industrial Properties quarterly revenues of $76.7M. Invitation Homes's net income of $143.1M is higher than Innovative Industrial Properties's net income of $40M. Notably, Invitation Homes's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.34x while Innovative Industrial Properties's PE ratio is 8.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invitation Homes is 7.41x versus 4.50x for Innovative Industrial Properties. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Iron Mountain has a net margin of 21.71% compared to Invitation Homes's net margin of 6.57%. Invitation Homes's return on equity of 4.52% beat Iron Mountain's return on equity of 236.21%.

Invitation Homes has a consensus price target of $36.86, signalling upside risk potential of 16.51%. On the other hand Iron Mountain has an analysts' consensus of $113.78 which suggests that it could grow by 39.38%. Given that Iron Mountain has higher upside potential than Invitation Homes, analysts believe Iron Mountain is more attractive than Invitation Homes.

Invitation Homes has a beta of 0.863, which suggesting that the stock is 13.722% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Iron Mountain has a beta of 0.978, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.188%.

Invitation Homes has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.6%. Iron Mountain offers a yield of 3.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share. Invitation Homes pays 151.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Iron Mountain pays out 438.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Invitation Homes quarterly revenues are $659.1M, which are smaller than Iron Mountain quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Invitation Homes's net income of $143.1M is higher than Iron Mountain's net income of $103.9M. Notably, Invitation Homes's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.34x while Iron Mountain's PE ratio is 133.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invitation Homes is 7.41x versus 3.92x for Iron Mountain. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lamar Advertising has a net margin of 21.71% compared to Invitation Homes's net margin of -0.21%. Invitation Homes's return on equity of 4.52% beat Lamar Advertising's return on equity of 30.88%.

Invitation Homes has a consensus price target of $36.86, signalling upside risk potential of 16.51%. On the other hand Lamar Advertising has an analysts' consensus of $132.60 which suggests that it could grow by 20.9%. Given that Lamar Advertising has higher upside potential than Invitation Homes, analysts believe Lamar Advertising is more attractive than Invitation Homes.

Invitation Homes has a beta of 0.863, which suggesting that the stock is 13.722% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lamar Advertising has a beta of 1.339, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.853%.

Invitation Homes has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.6%. Lamar Advertising offers a yield of 5.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.55 per share. Invitation Homes pays 151.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Lamar Advertising pays out 160.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Invitation Homes quarterly revenues are $659.1M, which are larger than Lamar Advertising quarterly revenues of $579.6M. Invitation Homes's net income of $143.1M is higher than Lamar Advertising's net income of -$1.2M. Notably, Invitation Homes's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.34x while Lamar Advertising's PE ratio is 31.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invitation Homes is 7.41x versus 5.10x for Lamar Advertising. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PotlatchDeltic has a net margin of 21.71% compared to Invitation Homes's net margin of 2.01%. Invitation Homes's return on equity of 4.52% beat PotlatchDeltic's return on equity of 1.04%.

Invitation Homes has a consensus price target of $36.86, signalling upside risk potential of 16.51%. On the other hand PotlatchDeltic has an analysts' consensus of $50.38 which suggests that it could grow by 28.31%. Given that PotlatchDeltic has higher upside potential than Invitation Homes, analysts believe PotlatchDeltic is more attractive than Invitation Homes.

Invitation Homes has a beta of 0.863, which suggesting that the stock is 13.722% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PotlatchDeltic has a beta of 1.125, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.539%.

Invitation Homes has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.6%. PotlatchDeltic offers a yield of 4.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Invitation Homes pays 151.84% of its earnings as a dividend. PotlatchDeltic pays out 650.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Invitation Homes quarterly revenues are $659.1M, which are larger than PotlatchDeltic quarterly revenues of $258.1M. Invitation Homes's net income of $143.1M is higher than PotlatchDeltic's net income of $5.2M. Notably, Invitation Homes's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.34x while PotlatchDeltic's PE ratio is 142.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invitation Homes is 7.41x versus 2.93x for PotlatchDeltic. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.