GD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

GE Aerospace has a net margin of 8.61% compared to General Dynamics's net margin of 17.57%. General Dynamics's return on equity of 17.23% beat GE Aerospace's return on equity of 27.96%.

General Dynamics has a consensus price target of $287.67, signalling upside risk potential of 3.99%. On the other hand GE Aerospace has an analysts' consensus of $219.02 which suggests that it could grow by 20.04%. Given that GE Aerospace has higher upside potential than General Dynamics, analysts believe GE Aerospace is more attractive than General Dynamics.

General Dynamics has a beta of 0.429, which suggesting that the stock is 57.074% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GE Aerospace has a beta of 1.047, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.7%.

General Dynamics has a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.08%. GE Aerospace offers a yield of 0.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. General Dynamics pays 40.43% of its earnings as a dividend. GE Aerospace pays out 15.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

General Dynamics quarterly revenues are $13.3B, which are larger than GE Aerospace quarterly revenues of $10.8B. General Dynamics's net income of $1.1B is lower than GE Aerospace's net income of $1.9B. Notably, General Dynamics's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.28x while GE Aerospace's PE ratio is 30.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for General Dynamics is 1.62x versus 4.36x for GE Aerospace. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

L3Harris Technologies has a net margin of 8.61% compared to General Dynamics's net margin of 8.2%. General Dynamics's return on equity of 17.23% beat L3Harris Technologies's return on equity of 7.9%.

General Dynamics has a consensus price target of $287.67, signalling upside risk potential of 3.99%. On the other hand L3Harris Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $255.85 which suggests that it could grow by 16.89%. Given that L3Harris Technologies has higher upside potential than General Dynamics, analysts believe L3Harris Technologies is more attractive than General Dynamics.

General Dynamics has a beta of 0.429, which suggesting that the stock is 57.074% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison L3Harris Technologies has a beta of 0.715, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.488%.

General Dynamics has a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.08%. L3Harris Technologies offers a yield of 2.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share. General Dynamics pays 40.43% of its earnings as a dividend. L3Harris Technologies pays out 58.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

General Dynamics quarterly revenues are $13.3B, which are larger than L3Harris Technologies quarterly revenues of $5.5B. General Dynamics's net income of $1.1B is higher than L3Harris Technologies's net income of $453M. Notably, General Dynamics's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.28x while L3Harris Technologies's PE ratio is 27.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for General Dynamics is 1.62x versus 1.96x for L3Harris Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lockheed Martin has a net margin of 8.61% compared to General Dynamics's net margin of 2.83%. General Dynamics's return on equity of 17.23% beat Lockheed Martin's return on equity of 80.38%.

General Dynamics has a consensus price target of $287.67, signalling upside risk potential of 3.99%. On the other hand Lockheed Martin has an analysts' consensus of $523.08 which suggests that it could grow by 9.64%. Given that Lockheed Martin has higher upside potential than General Dynamics, analysts believe Lockheed Martin is more attractive than General Dynamics.

General Dynamics has a beta of 0.429, which suggesting that the stock is 57.074% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lockheed Martin has a beta of 0.389, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.059%.

General Dynamics has a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.08%. Lockheed Martin offers a yield of 2.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.30 per share. General Dynamics pays 40.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Lockheed Martin pays out 57.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

General Dynamics quarterly revenues are $13.3B, which are smaller than Lockheed Martin quarterly revenues of $18.6B. General Dynamics's net income of $1.1B is higher than Lockheed Martin's net income of $527M. Notably, General Dynamics's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.28x while Lockheed Martin's PE ratio is 21.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for General Dynamics is 1.62x versus 1.61x for Lockheed Martin. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RTX has a net margin of 8.61% compared to General Dynamics's net margin of 6.85%. General Dynamics's return on equity of 17.23% beat RTX's return on equity of 7.72%.

General Dynamics has a consensus price target of $287.67, signalling upside risk potential of 3.99%. On the other hand RTX has an analysts' consensus of $140.74 which suggests that it could grow by 8.89%. Given that RTX has higher upside potential than General Dynamics, analysts believe RTX is more attractive than General Dynamics.

General Dynamics has a beta of 0.429, which suggesting that the stock is 57.074% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RTX has a beta of 0.604, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.573%.

General Dynamics has a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.08%. RTX offers a yield of 1.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share. General Dynamics pays 40.43% of its earnings as a dividend. RTX pays out 67.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

General Dynamics quarterly revenues are $13.3B, which are smaller than RTX quarterly revenues of $21.6B. General Dynamics's net income of $1.1B is lower than RTX's net income of $1.5B. Notably, General Dynamics's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.28x while RTX's PE ratio is 36.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for General Dynamics is 1.62x versus 2.15x for RTX. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.