LHX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

General Dynamics has a net margin of 8.2% compared to L3Harris Technologies's net margin of 8.61%. L3Harris Technologies's return on equity of 7.9% beat General Dynamics's return on equity of 17.23%.

L3Harris Technologies has a consensus price target of $257.58, signalling upside risk potential of 23.99%. On the other hand General Dynamics has an analysts' consensus of $288.64 which suggests that it could grow by 7.27%. Given that L3Harris Technologies has higher upside potential than General Dynamics, analysts believe L3Harris Technologies is more attractive than General Dynamics.

L3Harris Technologies has a beta of 0.738, which suggesting that the stock is 26.218% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison General Dynamics has a beta of 0.586, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.395%.

L3Harris Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.25%. General Dynamics offers a yield of 2.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.42 per share. L3Harris Technologies pays 58.99% of its earnings as a dividend. General Dynamics pays out 40.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

L3Harris Technologies quarterly revenues are $5.5B, which are smaller than General Dynamics quarterly revenues of $13.3B. L3Harris Technologies's net income of $453M is lower than General Dynamics's net income of $1.1B. Notably, L3Harris Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.40x while General Dynamics's PE ratio is 19.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for L3Harris Technologies is 1.86x versus 1.57x for General Dynamics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lockheed Martin has a net margin of 8.2% compared to L3Harris Technologies's net margin of 2.83%. L3Harris Technologies's return on equity of 7.9% beat Lockheed Martin's return on equity of 80.38%.

L3Harris Technologies has a consensus price target of $257.58, signalling upside risk potential of 23.99%. On the other hand Lockheed Martin has an analysts' consensus of $523.76 which suggests that it could grow by 18.64%. Given that L3Harris Technologies has higher upside potential than Lockheed Martin, analysts believe L3Harris Technologies is more attractive than Lockheed Martin.

L3Harris Technologies has a beta of 0.738, which suggesting that the stock is 26.218% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lockheed Martin has a beta of 0.432, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.807%.

L3Harris Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.25%. Lockheed Martin offers a yield of 2.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.30 per share. L3Harris Technologies pays 58.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Lockheed Martin pays out 57.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

L3Harris Technologies quarterly revenues are $5.5B, which are smaller than Lockheed Martin quarterly revenues of $18.6B. L3Harris Technologies's net income of $453M is lower than Lockheed Martin's net income of $527M. Notably, L3Harris Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.40x while Lockheed Martin's PE ratio is 19.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for L3Harris Technologies is 1.86x versus 1.49x for Lockheed Martin. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Northrop Grumman has a net margin of 8.2% compared to L3Harris Technologies's net margin of 11.83%. L3Harris Technologies's return on equity of 7.9% beat Northrop Grumman's return on equity of 28.45%.

L3Harris Technologies has a consensus price target of $257.58, signalling upside risk potential of 23.99%. On the other hand Northrop Grumman has an analysts' consensus of $548.61 which suggests that it could grow by 7.11%. Given that L3Harris Technologies has higher upside potential than Northrop Grumman, analysts believe L3Harris Technologies is more attractive than Northrop Grumman.

L3Harris Technologies has a beta of 0.738, which suggesting that the stock is 26.218% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Northrop Grumman has a beta of 0.306, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.424%.

L3Harris Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.25%. Northrop Grumman offers a yield of 1.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.06 per share. L3Harris Technologies pays 58.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Northrop Grumman pays out 28.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

L3Harris Technologies quarterly revenues are $5.5B, which are smaller than Northrop Grumman quarterly revenues of $10.7B. L3Harris Technologies's net income of $453M is lower than Northrop Grumman's net income of $1.3B. Notably, L3Harris Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.40x while Northrop Grumman's PE ratio is 18.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for L3Harris Technologies is 1.86x versus 1.84x for Northrop Grumman. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RTX has a net margin of 8.2% compared to L3Harris Technologies's net margin of 6.85%. L3Harris Technologies's return on equity of 7.9% beat RTX's return on equity of 7.72%.

L3Harris Technologies has a consensus price target of $257.58, signalling upside risk potential of 23.99%. On the other hand RTX has an analysts' consensus of $143.33 which suggests that it could grow by 8.82%. Given that L3Harris Technologies has higher upside potential than RTX, analysts believe L3Harris Technologies is more attractive than RTX.

L3Harris Technologies has a beta of 0.738, which suggesting that the stock is 26.218% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RTX has a beta of 0.803, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.687%.

L3Harris Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.25%. RTX offers a yield of 1.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share. L3Harris Technologies pays 58.99% of its earnings as a dividend. RTX pays out 67.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

L3Harris Technologies quarterly revenues are $5.5B, which are smaller than RTX quarterly revenues of $21.6B. L3Harris Technologies's net income of $453M is lower than RTX's net income of $1.5B. Notably, L3Harris Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.40x while RTX's PE ratio is 37.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for L3Harris Technologies is 1.86x versus 2.19x for RTX. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.