MUSI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF has a net margin of -- compared to American Century Multisector Income ETF's net margin of --. American Century Multisector Income ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF's return on equity of --.

American Century Multisector Income ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that American Century Multisector Income ETF has higher upside potential than iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF, analysts believe American Century Multisector Income ETF is more attractive than iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF.

American Century Multisector Income ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF has a beta of 0.855, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.544%.

American Century Multisector Income ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.04%. iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF offers a yield of 5.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. American Century Multisector Income ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

American Century Multisector Income ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF quarterly revenues of --. American Century Multisector Income ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF's net income of --. Notably, American Century Multisector Income ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for American Century Multisector Income ETF is -- versus -- for iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Angel Oak Income ETF has a net margin of -- compared to American Century Multisector Income ETF's net margin of --. American Century Multisector Income ETF's return on equity of -- beat Angel Oak Income ETF's return on equity of --.

American Century Multisector Income ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Angel Oak Income ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that American Century Multisector Income ETF has higher upside potential than Angel Oak Income ETF, analysts believe American Century Multisector Income ETF is more attractive than Angel Oak Income ETF.

American Century Multisector Income ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Angel Oak Income ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

American Century Multisector Income ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.04%. Angel Oak Income ETF offers a yield of 6.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. American Century Multisector Income ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Angel Oak Income ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

American Century Multisector Income ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Angel Oak Income ETF quarterly revenues of --. American Century Multisector Income ETF's net income of -- is lower than Angel Oak Income ETF's net income of --. Notably, American Century Multisector Income ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Angel Oak Income ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for American Century Multisector Income ETF is -- versus -- for Angel Oak Income ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF has a net margin of -- compared to American Century Multisector Income ETF's net margin of --. American Century Multisector Income ETF's return on equity of -- beat Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF's return on equity of --.

American Century Multisector Income ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that American Century Multisector Income ETF has higher upside potential than Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF, analysts believe American Century Multisector Income ETF is more attractive than Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF.

American Century Multisector Income ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

American Century Multisector Income ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.04%. Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF offers a yield of 5.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. American Century Multisector Income ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

American Century Multisector Income ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF quarterly revenues of --. American Century Multisector Income ETF's net income of -- is lower than Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF's net income of --. Notably, American Century Multisector Income ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for American Century Multisector Income ETF is -- versus -- for Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Columbia Diversified Fixed Income Allocation ETF has a net margin of -- compared to American Century Multisector Income ETF's net margin of --. American Century Multisector Income ETF's return on equity of -- beat Columbia Diversified Fixed Income Allocation ETF's return on equity of --.

American Century Multisector Income ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Columbia Diversified Fixed Income Allocation ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that American Century Multisector Income ETF has higher upside potential than Columbia Diversified Fixed Income Allocation ETF, analysts believe American Century Multisector Income ETF is more attractive than Columbia Diversified Fixed Income Allocation ETF.

American Century Multisector Income ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Columbia Diversified Fixed Income Allocation ETF has a beta of 1.321, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.131%.

American Century Multisector Income ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.04%. Columbia Diversified Fixed Income Allocation ETF offers a yield of 4.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. American Century Multisector Income ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Columbia Diversified Fixed Income Allocation ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

American Century Multisector Income ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Columbia Diversified Fixed Income Allocation ETF quarterly revenues of --. American Century Multisector Income ETF's net income of -- is lower than Columbia Diversified Fixed Income Allocation ETF's net income of --. Notably, American Century Multisector Income ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Columbia Diversified Fixed Income Allocation ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for American Century Multisector Income ETF is -- versus -- for Columbia Diversified Fixed Income Allocation ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.