Is COWZ ETF a Good Investment?
There’s a reason even Warren Buffett advocates his heirs to…
Sell
9
CARY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$20.47
Seasonality move
:
0.43%
Day range:
$20.48 - $20.92
52-week range:
$20.18 - $21.50
Dividend yield:
6.3%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
46K
Avg. volume:
101.5K
1-year change:
-0.19%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CARY
Angel Oak Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BINC
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BYLD
iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CGMS
Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FLXR
TCW Flexible Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MUSI
American Century Multisector Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CARY
Angel Oak Income ETF
|
$20.53 | -- | -- | -- | $0.21 | 6.3% | -- |
|
BINC
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF
|
$51.89 | -- | -- | -- | $0.58 | 6.15% | -- |
|
BYLD
iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF
|
$22.01 | -- | -- | -- | $0.10 | 5.35% | -- |
|
CGMS
Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF
|
$27.10 | -- | -- | -- | $0.17 | 5.95% | -- |
|
FLXR
TCW Flexible Income ETF
|
$38.48 | -- | -- | -- | $0.12 | 6.87% | -- |
|
MUSI
American Century Multisector Income ETF
|
$42.96 | -- | -- | -- | $0.25 | 6.04% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CARY
Angel Oak Income ETF
|
-- | 0.580 | -- | -- |
|
BINC
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF
|
-- | 0.494 | -- | -- |
|
BYLD
iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF
|
-- | 0.753 | -- | -- |
|
CGMS
Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF
|
-- | 0.673 | -- | -- |
|
FLXR
TCW Flexible Income ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
MUSI
American Century Multisector Income ETF
|
-- | 0.813 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CARY
Angel Oak Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BINC
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BYLD
iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CGMS
Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FLXR
TCW Flexible Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MUSI
American Century Multisector Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Angel Oak Income ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CARY or BINC?
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Angel Oak Income ETF's net margin of --. Angel Oak Income ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares Flexible Income Active ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CARYAngel Oak Income ETF-- -- -- BINCiShares Flexible Income Active ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CARY or BINC?
Angel Oak Income ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares Flexible Income Active ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Angel Oak Income ETF has higher upside potential than iShares Flexible Income Active ETF, analysts believe Angel Oak Income ETF is more attractive than iShares Flexible Income Active ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CARYAngel Oak Income ETF0 0 0 BINCiShares Flexible Income Active ETF0 0 0 -
Is CARY or BINC More Risky?
Angel Oak Income ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares Flexible Income Active ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CARY or BINC?
Angel Oak Income ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.3%. iShares Flexible Income Active ETF offers a yield of 6.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share. Angel Oak Income ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares Flexible Income Active ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CARY or BINC?
Angel Oak Income ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares Flexible Income Active ETF quarterly revenues of --. Angel Oak Income ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares Flexible Income Active ETF's net income of --. Notably, Angel Oak Income ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares Flexible Income Active ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Angel Oak Income ETF is -- versus -- for iShares Flexible Income Active ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CARYAngel Oak Income ETF-- -- -- -- BINCiShares Flexible Income Active ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CARY or BYLD?
iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Angel Oak Income ETF's net margin of --. Angel Oak Income ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CARYAngel Oak Income ETF-- -- -- BYLDiShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CARY or BYLD?
Angel Oak Income ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Angel Oak Income ETF has higher upside potential than iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF, analysts believe Angel Oak Income ETF is more attractive than iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CARYAngel Oak Income ETF0 0 0 BYLDiShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF0 0 0 -
Is CARY or BYLD More Risky?
Angel Oak Income ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF has a beta of 0.855, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.544%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CARY or BYLD?
Angel Oak Income ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.3%. iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF offers a yield of 5.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Angel Oak Income ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CARY or BYLD?
Angel Oak Income ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF quarterly revenues of --. Angel Oak Income ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF's net income of --. Notably, Angel Oak Income ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Angel Oak Income ETF is -- versus -- for iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CARYAngel Oak Income ETF-- -- -- -- BYLDiShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CARY or CGMS?
Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Angel Oak Income ETF's net margin of --. Angel Oak Income ETF's return on equity of -- beat Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CARYAngel Oak Income ETF-- -- -- CGMSCapital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CARY or CGMS?
Angel Oak Income ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Angel Oak Income ETF has higher upside potential than Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF, analysts believe Angel Oak Income ETF is more attractive than Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CARYAngel Oak Income ETF0 0 0 CGMSCapital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF0 0 0 -
Is CARY or CGMS More Risky?
Angel Oak Income ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CARY or CGMS?
Angel Oak Income ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.3%. Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF offers a yield of 5.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Angel Oak Income ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CARY or CGMS?
Angel Oak Income ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF quarterly revenues of --. Angel Oak Income ETF's net income of -- is lower than Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF's net income of --. Notably, Angel Oak Income ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Angel Oak Income ETF is -- versus -- for Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CARYAngel Oak Income ETF-- -- -- -- CGMSCapital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CARY or FLXR?
TCW Flexible Income ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Angel Oak Income ETF's net margin of --. Angel Oak Income ETF's return on equity of -- beat TCW Flexible Income ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CARYAngel Oak Income ETF-- -- -- FLXRTCW Flexible Income ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CARY or FLXR?
Angel Oak Income ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand TCW Flexible Income ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Angel Oak Income ETF has higher upside potential than TCW Flexible Income ETF, analysts believe Angel Oak Income ETF is more attractive than TCW Flexible Income ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CARYAngel Oak Income ETF0 0 0 FLXRTCW Flexible Income ETF0 0 0 -
Is CARY or FLXR More Risky?
Angel Oak Income ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TCW Flexible Income ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CARY or FLXR?
Angel Oak Income ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.3%. TCW Flexible Income ETF offers a yield of 6.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Angel Oak Income ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. TCW Flexible Income ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CARY or FLXR?
Angel Oak Income ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than TCW Flexible Income ETF quarterly revenues of --. Angel Oak Income ETF's net income of -- is lower than TCW Flexible Income ETF's net income of --. Notably, Angel Oak Income ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while TCW Flexible Income ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Angel Oak Income ETF is -- versus -- for TCW Flexible Income ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CARYAngel Oak Income ETF-- -- -- -- FLXRTCW Flexible Income ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CARY or MUSI?
American Century Multisector Income ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Angel Oak Income ETF's net margin of --. Angel Oak Income ETF's return on equity of -- beat American Century Multisector Income ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CARYAngel Oak Income ETF-- -- -- MUSIAmerican Century Multisector Income ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CARY or MUSI?
Angel Oak Income ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand American Century Multisector Income ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Angel Oak Income ETF has higher upside potential than American Century Multisector Income ETF, analysts believe Angel Oak Income ETF is more attractive than American Century Multisector Income ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CARYAngel Oak Income ETF0 0 0 MUSIAmerican Century Multisector Income ETF0 0 0 -
Is CARY or MUSI More Risky?
Angel Oak Income ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison American Century Multisector Income ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CARY or MUSI?
Angel Oak Income ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.3%. American Century Multisector Income ETF offers a yield of 6.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Angel Oak Income ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. American Century Multisector Income ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CARY or MUSI?
Angel Oak Income ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than American Century Multisector Income ETF quarterly revenues of --. Angel Oak Income ETF's net income of -- is lower than American Century Multisector Income ETF's net income of --. Notably, Angel Oak Income ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while American Century Multisector Income ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Angel Oak Income ETF is -- versus -- for American Century Multisector Income ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CARYAngel Oak Income ETF-- -- -- -- MUSIAmerican Century Multisector Income ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
3 Stocks Buffett Is Betting On
Warren Buffett appeared to take a hard look at the…
Why Did Buffett Sell So Much Last Year?
In 2024, value investing legend Warren Buffett did the seemingly…
Stock Ideas
Sell
46
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.5T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Sell
46
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 112x
Sell
40
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Alerts
Buy
61
ITCI alert for Jan 14
Intra-Cellular Therapies [ITCI] is down 0.26% over the past day.
Sell
30
ESTA alert for Jan 14
Establishment Labs Holdings [ESTA] is down 1.51% over the past day.
Buy
72
DJT alert for Jan 14
Trump Media & Technology Group [DJT] is down 8.25% over the past day.
