Is COWZ ETF a Good Investment?
There’s a reason even Warren Buffett advocates his heirs to…
Sell
37
CGMS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$27.12
Seasonality move
:
0.29%
Day range:
$27.06 - $27.11
52-week range:
$26.49 - $28.00
Dividend yield:
5.95%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
1.1M
Avg. volume:
653.5K
1-year change:
--
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CGMS
Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BINC
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CARY
Angel Oak Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EVV
Eaton Vance Ltd Duration Income Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MUSI
American Century Multisector Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PYLD
PIMCO Multisector Bond Active ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CGMS
Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF
|
$27.10 | -- | -- | -- | $0.17 | 5.95% | -- |
|
BINC
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF
|
$51.89 | -- | -- | -- | $0.58 | 6.15% | -- |
|
CARY
Angel Oak Income ETF
|
$20.53 | -- | -- | -- | $0.21 | 6.3% | -- |
|
EVV
Eaton Vance Ltd Duration Income Fund
|
$9.88 | -- | -- | -- | $0.07 | 6.96% | -- |
|
MUSI
American Century Multisector Income ETF
|
$42.96 | -- | -- | -- | $0.25 | 6.04% | -- |
|
PYLD
PIMCO Multisector Bond Active ETF
|
$25.77 | -- | -- | -- | $0.13 | 6% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CGMS
Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF
|
-- | 0.673 | -- | -- |
|
BINC
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF
|
-- | 0.494 | -- | -- |
|
CARY
Angel Oak Income ETF
|
-- | 0.580 | -- | -- |
|
EVV
Eaton Vance Ltd Duration Income Fund
|
-- | 1.192 | -- | -- |
|
MUSI
American Century Multisector Income ETF
|
-- | 0.813 | -- | -- |
|
PYLD
PIMCO Multisector Bond Active ETF
|
-- | 0.726 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CGMS
Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BINC
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CARY
Angel Oak Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EVV
Eaton Vance Ltd Duration Income Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MUSI
American Century Multisector Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PYLD
PIMCO Multisector Bond Active ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CGMS or BINC?
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF's net margin of --. Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares Flexible Income Active ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CGMSCapital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF-- -- -- BINCiShares Flexible Income Active ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CGMS or BINC?
Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares Flexible Income Active ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF has higher upside potential than iShares Flexible Income Active ETF, analysts believe Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF is more attractive than iShares Flexible Income Active ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CGMSCapital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF0 0 0 BINCiShares Flexible Income Active ETF0 0 0 -
Is CGMS or BINC More Risky?
Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares Flexible Income Active ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CGMS or BINC?
Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.95%. iShares Flexible Income Active ETF offers a yield of 6.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share. Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares Flexible Income Active ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CGMS or BINC?
Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares Flexible Income Active ETF quarterly revenues of --. Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares Flexible Income Active ETF's net income of --. Notably, Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares Flexible Income Active ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF is -- versus -- for iShares Flexible Income Active ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CGMSCapital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF-- -- -- -- BINCiShares Flexible Income Active ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CGMS or CARY?
Angel Oak Income ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF's net margin of --. Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF's return on equity of -- beat Angel Oak Income ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CGMSCapital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF-- -- -- CARYAngel Oak Income ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CGMS or CARY?
Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Angel Oak Income ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF has higher upside potential than Angel Oak Income ETF, analysts believe Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF is more attractive than Angel Oak Income ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CGMSCapital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF0 0 0 CARYAngel Oak Income ETF0 0 0 -
Is CGMS or CARY More Risky?
Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Angel Oak Income ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CGMS or CARY?
Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.95%. Angel Oak Income ETF offers a yield of 6.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Angel Oak Income ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CGMS or CARY?
Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Angel Oak Income ETF quarterly revenues of --. Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF's net income of -- is lower than Angel Oak Income ETF's net income of --. Notably, Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Angel Oak Income ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF is -- versus -- for Angel Oak Income ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CGMSCapital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF-- -- -- -- CARYAngel Oak Income ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CGMS or EVV?
Eaton Vance Ltd Duration Income Fund has a net margin of -- compared to Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF's net margin of --. Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF's return on equity of -- beat Eaton Vance Ltd Duration Income Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CGMSCapital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF-- -- -- EVVEaton Vance Ltd Duration Income Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CGMS or EVV?
Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Eaton Vance Ltd Duration Income Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF has higher upside potential than Eaton Vance Ltd Duration Income Fund, analysts believe Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF is more attractive than Eaton Vance Ltd Duration Income Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CGMSCapital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF0 0 0 EVVEaton Vance Ltd Duration Income Fund0 0 0 -
Is CGMS or EVV More Risky?
Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Eaton Vance Ltd Duration Income Fund has a beta of 1.471, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.122%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CGMS or EVV?
Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.95%. Eaton Vance Ltd Duration Income Fund offers a yield of 6.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Eaton Vance Ltd Duration Income Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CGMS or EVV?
Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Eaton Vance Ltd Duration Income Fund quarterly revenues of --. Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF's net income of -- is lower than Eaton Vance Ltd Duration Income Fund's net income of --. Notably, Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Eaton Vance Ltd Duration Income Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF is -- versus -- for Eaton Vance Ltd Duration Income Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CGMSCapital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF-- -- -- -- EVVEaton Vance Ltd Duration Income Fund-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CGMS or MUSI?
American Century Multisector Income ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF's net margin of --. Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF's return on equity of -- beat American Century Multisector Income ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CGMSCapital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF-- -- -- MUSIAmerican Century Multisector Income ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CGMS or MUSI?
Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand American Century Multisector Income ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF has higher upside potential than American Century Multisector Income ETF, analysts believe Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF is more attractive than American Century Multisector Income ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CGMSCapital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF0 0 0 MUSIAmerican Century Multisector Income ETF0 0 0 -
Is CGMS or MUSI More Risky?
Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison American Century Multisector Income ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CGMS or MUSI?
Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.95%. American Century Multisector Income ETF offers a yield of 6.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. American Century Multisector Income ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CGMS or MUSI?
Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than American Century Multisector Income ETF quarterly revenues of --. Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF's net income of -- is lower than American Century Multisector Income ETF's net income of --. Notably, Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while American Century Multisector Income ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF is -- versus -- for American Century Multisector Income ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CGMSCapital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF-- -- -- -- MUSIAmerican Century Multisector Income ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CGMS or PYLD?
PIMCO Multisector Bond Active ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF's net margin of --. Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF's return on equity of -- beat PIMCO Multisector Bond Active ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CGMSCapital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF-- -- -- PYLDPIMCO Multisector Bond Active ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CGMS or PYLD?
Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand PIMCO Multisector Bond Active ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF has higher upside potential than PIMCO Multisector Bond Active ETF, analysts believe Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF is more attractive than PIMCO Multisector Bond Active ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CGMSCapital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF0 0 0 PYLDPIMCO Multisector Bond Active ETF0 0 0 -
Is CGMS or PYLD More Risky?
Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PIMCO Multisector Bond Active ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CGMS or PYLD?
Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.95%. PIMCO Multisector Bond Active ETF offers a yield of 6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PIMCO Multisector Bond Active ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CGMS or PYLD?
Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than PIMCO Multisector Bond Active ETF quarterly revenues of --. Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF's net income of -- is lower than PIMCO Multisector Bond Active ETF's net income of --. Notably, Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while PIMCO Multisector Bond Active ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF is -- versus -- for PIMCO Multisector Bond Active ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CGMSCapital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF-- -- -- -- PYLDPIMCO Multisector Bond Active ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
3 Stocks Buffett Is Betting On
Warren Buffett appeared to take a hard look at the…
Why Did Buffett Sell So Much Last Year?
In 2024, value investing legend Warren Buffett did the seemingly…
Stock Ideas
Sell
46
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.5T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Sell
46
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 112x
Sell
40
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Alerts
Buy
61
ITCI alert for Jan 14
Intra-Cellular Therapies [ITCI] is down 0.26% over the past day.
Sell
30
ESTA alert for Jan 14
Establishment Labs Holdings [ESTA] is down 1.51% over the past day.
Buy
72
DJT alert for Jan 14
Trump Media & Technology Group [DJT] is down 8.25% over the past day.
