Is COWZ ETF a Good Investment?
There’s a reason even Warren Buffett advocates his heirs to…
Sell
33
BINC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$51.93
Seasonality move
:
0.23%
Day range:
$51.85 - $51.96
52-week range:
$51.53 - $53.57
Dividend yield:
6.15%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
1.4M
Avg. volume:
938.3K
1-year change:
-0.82%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BINC
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BYLD
iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CGMS
Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MUSI
American Century Multisector Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PYLD
PIMCO Multisector Bond Active ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BINC
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF
|
$51.89 | -- | -- | -- | $0.58 | 6.15% | -- |
|
BYLD
iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF
|
$22.01 | -- | -- | -- | $0.10 | 5.35% | -- |
|
CGMS
Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF
|
$27.10 | -- | -- | -- | $0.17 | 5.95% | -- |
|
MUSI
American Century Multisector Income ETF
|
$42.96 | -- | -- | -- | $0.25 | 6.04% | -- |
|
PYLD
PIMCO Multisector Bond Active ETF
|
$25.77 | -- | -- | -- | $0.13 | 6% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BINC
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF
|
-- | 0.494 | -- | -- |
|
BYLD
iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF
|
-- | 0.753 | -- | -- |
|
CGMS
Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF
|
-- | 0.673 | -- | -- |
|
MUSI
American Century Multisector Income ETF
|
-- | 0.813 | -- | -- |
|
PYLD
PIMCO Multisector Bond Active ETF
|
-- | 0.726 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BINC
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BYLD
iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CGMS
Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MUSI
American Century Multisector Income ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PYLD
PIMCO Multisector Bond Active ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns BINC or BYLD?
iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares Flexible Income Active ETF's net margin of --. iShares Flexible Income Active ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BINCiShares Flexible Income Active ETF-- -- -- BYLDiShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About BINC or BYLD?
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares Flexible Income Active ETF has higher upside potential than iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF, analysts believe iShares Flexible Income Active ETF is more attractive than iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BINCiShares Flexible Income Active ETF0 0 0 BYLDiShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF0 0 0 -
Is BINC or BYLD More Risky?
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF has a beta of 0.855, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.544%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BINC or BYLD?
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.15%. iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF offers a yield of 5.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. iShares Flexible Income Active ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BINC or BYLD?
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares Flexible Income Active ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares Flexible Income Active ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares Flexible Income Active ETF is -- versus -- for iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BINCiShares Flexible Income Active ETF-- -- -- -- BYLDiShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BINC or CGMS?
Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares Flexible Income Active ETF's net margin of --. iShares Flexible Income Active ETF's return on equity of -- beat Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BINCiShares Flexible Income Active ETF-- -- -- CGMSCapital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About BINC or CGMS?
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares Flexible Income Active ETF has higher upside potential than Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF, analysts believe iShares Flexible Income Active ETF is more attractive than Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BINCiShares Flexible Income Active ETF0 0 0 CGMSCapital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF0 0 0 -
Is BINC or CGMS More Risky?
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BINC or CGMS?
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.15%. Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF offers a yield of 5.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. iShares Flexible Income Active ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BINC or CGMS?
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares Flexible Income Active ETF's net income of -- is lower than Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares Flexible Income Active ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares Flexible Income Active ETF is -- versus -- for Capital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BINCiShares Flexible Income Active ETF-- -- -- -- CGMSCapital Group US Multi-Sector Inc. ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BINC or MUSI?
American Century Multisector Income ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares Flexible Income Active ETF's net margin of --. iShares Flexible Income Active ETF's return on equity of -- beat American Century Multisector Income ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BINCiShares Flexible Income Active ETF-- -- -- MUSIAmerican Century Multisector Income ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About BINC or MUSI?
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand American Century Multisector Income ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares Flexible Income Active ETF has higher upside potential than American Century Multisector Income ETF, analysts believe iShares Flexible Income Active ETF is more attractive than American Century Multisector Income ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BINCiShares Flexible Income Active ETF0 0 0 MUSIAmerican Century Multisector Income ETF0 0 0 -
Is BINC or MUSI More Risky?
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison American Century Multisector Income ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BINC or MUSI?
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.15%. American Century Multisector Income ETF offers a yield of 6.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. iShares Flexible Income Active ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. American Century Multisector Income ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BINC or MUSI?
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than American Century Multisector Income ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares Flexible Income Active ETF's net income of -- is lower than American Century Multisector Income ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares Flexible Income Active ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while American Century Multisector Income ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares Flexible Income Active ETF is -- versus -- for American Century Multisector Income ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BINCiShares Flexible Income Active ETF-- -- -- -- MUSIAmerican Century Multisector Income ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns BINC or PYLD?
PIMCO Multisector Bond Active ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares Flexible Income Active ETF's net margin of --. iShares Flexible Income Active ETF's return on equity of -- beat PIMCO Multisector Bond Active ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital BINCiShares Flexible Income Active ETF-- -- -- PYLDPIMCO Multisector Bond Active ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About BINC or PYLD?
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand PIMCO Multisector Bond Active ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares Flexible Income Active ETF has higher upside potential than PIMCO Multisector Bond Active ETF, analysts believe iShares Flexible Income Active ETF is more attractive than PIMCO Multisector Bond Active ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings BINCiShares Flexible Income Active ETF0 0 0 PYLDPIMCO Multisector Bond Active ETF0 0 0 -
Is BINC or PYLD More Risky?
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PIMCO Multisector Bond Active ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock BINC or PYLD?
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.15%. PIMCO Multisector Bond Active ETF offers a yield of 6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. iShares Flexible Income Active ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PIMCO Multisector Bond Active ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios BINC or PYLD?
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than PIMCO Multisector Bond Active ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares Flexible Income Active ETF's net income of -- is lower than PIMCO Multisector Bond Active ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares Flexible Income Active ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while PIMCO Multisector Bond Active ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares Flexible Income Active ETF is -- versus -- for PIMCO Multisector Bond Active ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income BINCiShares Flexible Income Active ETF-- -- -- -- PYLDPIMCO Multisector Bond Active ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
3 Stocks Buffett Is Betting On
Warren Buffett appeared to take a hard look at the…
Why Did Buffett Sell So Much Last Year?
In 2024, value investing legend Warren Buffett did the seemingly…
Stock Ideas
Sell
46
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.5T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Sell
46
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 112x
Sell
40
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Alerts
Buy
61
ITCI alert for Jan 14
Intra-Cellular Therapies [ITCI] is down 0.26% over the past day.
Sell
30
ESTA alert for Jan 14
Establishment Labs Holdings [ESTA] is down 1.51% over the past day.
Buy
72
DJT alert for Jan 14
Trump Media & Technology Group [DJT] is down 8.25% over the past day.
