Is Roblox Stock a Buy, Sell or Hold?
Gaming company Roblox (NYSE:RBLX) operates a massive platform that allows…
Buy
70
KWEB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$36.32
Seasonality move
:
5.71%
Day range:
$35.97 - $36.64
52-week range:
$24.68 - $39.17
Dividend yield:
2.82%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
29.9M
Avg. volume:
31.3M
1-year change:
34.25%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
KWEB
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CQQQ
Invesco China Technology ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CWEB
Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KLIP
KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KSTR
KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KTEC
KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
KWEB
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
|
$36.30 | -- | -- | -- | $1.03 | 2.82% | -- |
|
CQQQ
Invesco China Technology ETF
|
$47.26 | -- | -- | -- | $0.11 | 0.23% | -- |
|
CWEB
Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs
|
$46.94 | -- | -- | -- | $1.08 | 3.12% | -- |
|
KLIP
KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF
|
$33.91 | -- | -- | -- | $0.67 | 45.27% | -- |
|
KSTR
KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF
|
$14.25 | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
KTEC
KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF
|
$17.30 | -- | -- | -- | $0.04 | 0.21% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
KWEB
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
|
-- | 0.096 | -- | -- |
|
CQQQ
Invesco China Technology ETF
|
-- | -0.167 | -- | -- |
|
CWEB
Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs
|
-- | -0.300 | -- | -- |
|
KLIP
KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF
|
-- | -0.256 | -- | -- |
|
KSTR
KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF
|
-- | -0.455 | -- | -- |
|
KTEC
KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF
|
-- | 0.046 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
KWEB
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CQQQ
Invesco China Technology ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CWEB
Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KLIP
KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KSTR
KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KTEC
KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns KWEB or CQQQ?
Invesco China Technology ETF has a net margin of -- compared to KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF's net margin of --. KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco China Technology ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KWEBKraneShares CSI China Internet ETF-- -- -- CQQQInvesco China Technology ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About KWEB or CQQQ?
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco China Technology ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco China Technology ETF, analysts believe KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF is more attractive than Invesco China Technology ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KWEBKraneShares CSI China Internet ETF0 0 0 CQQQInvesco China Technology ETF0 0 0 -
Is KWEB or CQQQ More Risky?
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF has a beta of 0.510, which suggesting that the stock is 48.981% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco China Technology ETF has a beta of 0.615, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.523%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KWEB or CQQQ?
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.82%. Invesco China Technology ETF offers a yield of 0.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco China Technology ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KWEB or CQQQ?
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco China Technology ETF quarterly revenues of --. KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco China Technology ETF's net income of --. Notably, KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco China Technology ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco China Technology ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KWEBKraneShares CSI China Internet ETF-- -- -- -- CQQQInvesco China Technology ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns KWEB or CWEB?
Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs has a net margin of -- compared to KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF's net margin of --. KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF's return on equity of -- beat Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KWEBKraneShares CSI China Internet ETF-- -- -- CWEBDirexion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About KWEB or CWEB?
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF has higher upside potential than Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs, analysts believe KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF is more attractive than Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KWEBKraneShares CSI China Internet ETF0 0 0 CWEBDirexion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs0 0 0 -
Is KWEB or CWEB More Risky?
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF has a beta of 0.510, which suggesting that the stock is 48.981% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs has a beta of 0.819, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.073%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KWEB or CWEB?
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.82%. Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs offers a yield of 3.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.08 per share. KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KWEB or CWEB?
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs quarterly revenues of --. KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF's net income of -- is lower than Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs's net income of --. Notably, KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF is -- versus -- for Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KWEBKraneShares CSI China Internet ETF-- -- -- -- CWEBDirexion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns KWEB or KLIP?
KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF has a net margin of -- compared to KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF's net margin of --. KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF's return on equity of -- beat KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KWEBKraneShares CSI China Internet ETF-- -- -- KLIPKraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About KWEB or KLIP?
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF has higher upside potential than KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF, analysts believe KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF is more attractive than KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KWEBKraneShares CSI China Internet ETF0 0 0 KLIPKraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF0 0 0 -
Is KWEB or KLIP More Risky?
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF has a beta of 0.510, which suggesting that the stock is 48.981% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KWEB or KLIP?
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.82%. KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF offers a yield of 45.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.67 per share. KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KWEB or KLIP?
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF quarterly revenues of --. KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF's net income of -- is lower than KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF's net income of --. Notably, KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF is -- versus -- for KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KWEBKraneShares CSI China Internet ETF-- -- -- -- KLIPKraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns KWEB or KSTR?
KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF has a net margin of -- compared to KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF's net margin of --. KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF's return on equity of -- beat KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KWEBKraneShares CSI China Internet ETF-- -- -- KSTRKraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About KWEB or KSTR?
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF has higher upside potential than KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF, analysts believe KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF is more attractive than KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KWEBKraneShares CSI China Internet ETF0 0 0 KSTRKraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF0 0 0 -
Is KWEB or KSTR More Risky?
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF has a beta of 0.510, which suggesting that the stock is 48.981% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KWEB or KSTR?
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.82%. KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KWEB or KSTR?
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF quarterly revenues of --. KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF's net income of -- is lower than KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF's net income of --. Notably, KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF is -- versus -- for KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KWEBKraneShares CSI China Internet ETF-- -- -- -- KSTRKraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns KWEB or KTEC?
KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF has a net margin of -- compared to KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF's net margin of --. KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF's return on equity of -- beat KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KWEBKraneShares CSI China Internet ETF-- -- -- KTECKraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About KWEB or KTEC?
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF has higher upside potential than KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF, analysts believe KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF is more attractive than KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KWEBKraneShares CSI China Internet ETF0 0 0 KTECKraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF0 0 0 -
Is KWEB or KTEC More Risky?
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF has a beta of 0.510, which suggesting that the stock is 48.981% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KWEB or KTEC?
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.82%. KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF offers a yield of 0.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KWEB or KTEC?
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF quarterly revenues of --. KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF's net income of -- is lower than KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF's net income of --. Notably, KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF is -- versus -- for KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KWEBKraneShares CSI China Internet ETF-- -- -- -- KTECKraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Shopify a Millionaire Maker?
Shopify (NYSE:SHOP) is an eCommerce platform, business services provider and…
Is Alphabet Stock No Longer a Good Bet?
Alphabet tripled its price per share over the past 5…
Stock Ideas
Buy
52
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Buy
51
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 33x
Alerts
Buy
95
EXOD alert for Mar 21
Exodus Movement [EXOD] is up 17.89% over the past day.
Buy
58
SIG alert for Mar 21
Signet Jewelers [SIG] is down 0.64% over the past day.
Sell
43
HQY alert for Mar 21
HealthEquity [HQY] is up 0.28% over the past day.
