NVIDIA vs Broadcom Stock: Which Is Best?
If you want to invest in an AI-leading tech company,…
Sell
40
CQQQ Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$40.17
Seasonality move
:
3.37%
Day range:
$40.61 - $41.20
52-week range:
$27.68 - $50.98
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
97.6K
Avg. volume:
199.9K
1-year change:
17.7%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CQQQ
Invesco China Technology ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ARTY
iShares Future AI & Tech ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KSTR
KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KTEC
KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KWEB
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PNQI
Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CQQQ
Invesco China Technology ETF
|
$41.02 | -- | -- | -- | $0.20 | 0% | -- |
|
ARTY
iShares Future AI & Tech ETF
|
$37.63 | -- | -- | -- | $0.07 | 0.5% | -- |
|
KSTR
KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF
|
$13.51 | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
KTEC
KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF
|
$13.61 | -- | -- | -- | $0.04 | 0.27% | -- |
|
KWEB
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
|
$29.96 | -- | -- | -- | $1.02 | 3.42% | -- |
|
PNQI
Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF
|
$47.57 | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CQQQ
Invesco China Technology ETF
|
-- | 0.002 | -- | -- |
|
ARTY
iShares Future AI & Tech ETF
|
-- | 1.411 | -- | -- |
|
KSTR
KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF
|
-- | 0.068 | -- | -- |
|
KTEC
KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF
|
-- | 0.274 | -- | -- |
|
KWEB
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
|
-- | 0.077 | -- | -- |
|
PNQI
Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF
|
-- | 1.076 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CQQQ
Invesco China Technology ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ARTY
iShares Future AI & Tech ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KSTR
KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KTEC
KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KWEB
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PNQI
Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Invesco China Technology ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CQQQ or ARTY?
iShares Future AI & Tech ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Invesco China Technology ETF's net margin of --. Invesco China Technology ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares Future AI & Tech ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CQQQInvesco China Technology ETF-- -- -- ARTYiShares Future AI & Tech ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CQQQ or ARTY?
Invesco China Technology ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares Future AI & Tech ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Invesco China Technology ETF has higher upside potential than iShares Future AI & Tech ETF, analysts believe Invesco China Technology ETF is more attractive than iShares Future AI & Tech ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CQQQInvesco China Technology ETF0 0 0 ARTYiShares Future AI & Tech ETF0 0 0 -
Is CQQQ or ARTY More Risky?
Invesco China Technology ETF has a beta of 0.569, which suggesting that the stock is 43.124% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares Future AI & Tech ETF has a beta of 1.135, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.547%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CQQQ or ARTY?
Invesco China Technology ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. iShares Future AI & Tech ETF offers a yield of 0.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. Invesco China Technology ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares Future AI & Tech ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CQQQ or ARTY?
Invesco China Technology ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares Future AI & Tech ETF quarterly revenues of --. Invesco China Technology ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares Future AI & Tech ETF's net income of --. Notably, Invesco China Technology ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares Future AI & Tech ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invesco China Technology ETF is -- versus -- for iShares Future AI & Tech ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CQQQInvesco China Technology ETF-- -- -- -- ARTYiShares Future AI & Tech ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CQQQ or KSTR?
KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Invesco China Technology ETF's net margin of --. Invesco China Technology ETF's return on equity of -- beat KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CQQQInvesco China Technology ETF-- -- -- KSTRKraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CQQQ or KSTR?
Invesco China Technology ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Invesco China Technology ETF has higher upside potential than KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF, analysts believe Invesco China Technology ETF is more attractive than KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CQQQInvesco China Technology ETF0 0 0 KSTRKraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF0 0 0 -
Is CQQQ or KSTR More Risky?
Invesco China Technology ETF has a beta of 0.569, which suggesting that the stock is 43.124% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CQQQ or KSTR?
Invesco China Technology ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Invesco China Technology ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CQQQ or KSTR?
Invesco China Technology ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF quarterly revenues of --. Invesco China Technology ETF's net income of -- is lower than KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF's net income of --. Notably, Invesco China Technology ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invesco China Technology ETF is -- versus -- for KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CQQQInvesco China Technology ETF-- -- -- -- KSTRKraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CQQQ or KTEC?
KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Invesco China Technology ETF's net margin of --. Invesco China Technology ETF's return on equity of -- beat KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CQQQInvesco China Technology ETF-- -- -- KTECKraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CQQQ or KTEC?
Invesco China Technology ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Invesco China Technology ETF has higher upside potential than KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF, analysts believe Invesco China Technology ETF is more attractive than KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CQQQInvesco China Technology ETF0 0 0 KTECKraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF0 0 0 -
Is CQQQ or KTEC More Risky?
Invesco China Technology ETF has a beta of 0.569, which suggesting that the stock is 43.124% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CQQQ or KTEC?
Invesco China Technology ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF offers a yield of 0.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Invesco China Technology ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CQQQ or KTEC?
Invesco China Technology ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF quarterly revenues of --. Invesco China Technology ETF's net income of -- is lower than KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF's net income of --. Notably, Invesco China Technology ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invesco China Technology ETF is -- versus -- for KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CQQQInvesco China Technology ETF-- -- -- -- KTECKraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CQQQ or KWEB?
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Invesco China Technology ETF's net margin of --. Invesco China Technology ETF's return on equity of -- beat KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CQQQInvesco China Technology ETF-- -- -- KWEBKraneShares CSI China Internet ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CQQQ or KWEB?
Invesco China Technology ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Invesco China Technology ETF has higher upside potential than KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF, analysts believe Invesco China Technology ETF is more attractive than KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CQQQInvesco China Technology ETF0 0 0 KWEBKraneShares CSI China Internet ETF0 0 0 -
Is CQQQ or KWEB More Risky?
Invesco China Technology ETF has a beta of 0.569, which suggesting that the stock is 43.124% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF has a beta of 0.478, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.161%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CQQQ or KWEB?
Invesco China Technology ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF offers a yield of 3.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.02 per share. Invesco China Technology ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CQQQ or KWEB?
Invesco China Technology ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF quarterly revenues of --. Invesco China Technology ETF's net income of -- is lower than KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF's net income of --. Notably, Invesco China Technology ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invesco China Technology ETF is -- versus -- for KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CQQQInvesco China Technology ETF-- -- -- -- KWEBKraneShares CSI China Internet ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CQQQ or PNQI?
Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Invesco China Technology ETF's net margin of --. Invesco China Technology ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CQQQInvesco China Technology ETF-- -- -- PNQIInvesco NASDAQ Internet ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CQQQ or PNQI?
Invesco China Technology ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Invesco China Technology ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF, analysts believe Invesco China Technology ETF is more attractive than Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CQQQInvesco China Technology ETF0 0 0 PNQIInvesco NASDAQ Internet ETF0 0 0 -
Is CQQQ or PNQI More Risky?
Invesco China Technology ETF has a beta of 0.569, which suggesting that the stock is 43.124% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF has a beta of 1.166, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.641%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CQQQ or PNQI?
Invesco China Technology ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Invesco China Technology ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CQQQ or PNQI?
Invesco China Technology ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF quarterly revenues of --. Invesco China Technology ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF's net income of --. Notably, Invesco China Technology ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invesco China Technology ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CQQQInvesco China Technology ETF-- -- -- -- PNQIInvesco NASDAQ Internet ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Caesars’ Digital Arm May Be the Gaming Giant’s Best-Kept Secret
It’s not often that a company with the scale and…
Will Tyson Foods Stock Bounce Back?
Tyson Foods, Inc. (NYSE:TSN) is one of the biggest food…
Stock Ideas
Buy
64
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 113x
Buy
55
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Buy
61
QMCO alert for Dec 23
Quantum [QMCO] is down 2.13% over the past day.
Sell
46
NUKK alert for Dec 23
Nukkleus [NUKK] is up 2.88% over the past day.
Sell
1
IIPR alert for Dec 23
Innovative Industrial Properties [IIPR] is down 6.16% over the past day.
