2 Dividend Stocks to Buy in a Recession
While many economists and investors initially expected 2025 to be…
Sell
39
KLIP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$34.17
Seasonality move
:
-6.52%
Day range:
$33.60 - $33.76
52-week range:
$30.74 - $45.63
Dividend yield:
45.48%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
16.3K
Avg. volume:
43.5K
1-year change:
-24.75%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
KLIP
KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CHIQ
Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CWEB
Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FLTW
Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KWEB
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TWN
Taiwan Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
KLIP
KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF
|
$33.75 | -- | -- | -- | $0.67 | 45.48% | -- |
|
CHIQ
Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF
|
$23.37 | -- | -- | -- | $0.37 | 2.15% | -- |
|
CWEB
Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs
|
$48.27 | -- | -- | -- | $1.08 | 3.03% | -- |
|
FLTW
Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF
|
$45.79 | -- | -- | -- | $0.70 | 1.95% | -- |
|
KWEB
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
|
$36.78 | -- | -- | -- | $1.03 | 2.79% | -- |
|
TWN
Taiwan Fund
|
$34.84 | -- | -- | -- | $7.40 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
KLIP
KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF
|
-- | -0.256 | -- | -- |
|
CHIQ
Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF
|
-- | -0.204 | -- | -- |
|
CWEB
Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs
|
-- | -0.300 | -- | -- |
|
FLTW
Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF
|
-- | 0.300 | -- | -- |
|
KWEB
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
|
-- | 0.096 | -- | -- |
|
TWN
Taiwan Fund
|
-- | -0.046 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
KLIP
KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CHIQ
Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CWEB
Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FLTW
Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KWEB
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TWN
Taiwan Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns KLIP or CHIQ?
Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF has a net margin of -- compared to KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF's net margin of --. KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF's return on equity of -- beat Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KLIPKraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF-- -- -- CHIQGlobal X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About KLIP or CHIQ?
KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF has higher upside potential than Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF, analysts believe KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF is more attractive than Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KLIPKraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF0 0 0 CHIQGlobal X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF0 0 0 -
Is KLIP or CHIQ More Risky?
KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF has a beta of 0.647, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.253%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KLIP or CHIQ?
KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.67 per share corresponding to a yield of 45.48%. Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF offers a yield of 2.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share. KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KLIP or CHIQ?
KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF quarterly revenues of --. KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF's net income of -- is lower than Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF's net income of --. Notably, KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF is -- versus -- for Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KLIPKraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF-- -- -- -- CHIQGlobal X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns KLIP or CWEB?
Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs has a net margin of -- compared to KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF's net margin of --. KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF's return on equity of -- beat Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KLIPKraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF-- -- -- CWEBDirexion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About KLIP or CWEB?
KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF has higher upside potential than Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs, analysts believe KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF is more attractive than Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KLIPKraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF0 0 0 CWEBDirexion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs0 0 0 -
Is KLIP or CWEB More Risky?
KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs has a beta of 0.819, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.073%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KLIP or CWEB?
KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.67 per share corresponding to a yield of 45.48%. Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs offers a yield of 3.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.08 per share. KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KLIP or CWEB?
KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs quarterly revenues of --. KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF's net income of -- is lower than Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs's net income of --. Notably, KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF is -- versus -- for Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KLIPKraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF-- -- -- -- CWEBDirexion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns KLIP or FLTW?
Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF has a net margin of -- compared to KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF's net margin of --. KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF's return on equity of -- beat Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KLIPKraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF-- -- -- FLTWFranklin FTSE Taiwan ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About KLIP or FLTW?
KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF has higher upside potential than Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF, analysts believe KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF is more attractive than Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KLIPKraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF0 0 0 FLTWFranklin FTSE Taiwan ETF0 0 0 -
Is KLIP or FLTW More Risky?
KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF has a beta of 1.021, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.127%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KLIP or FLTW?
KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.67 per share corresponding to a yield of 45.48%. Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF offers a yield of 1.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share. KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KLIP or FLTW?
KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF quarterly revenues of --. KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF's net income of -- is lower than Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF's net income of --. Notably, KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF is -- versus -- for Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KLIPKraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF-- -- -- -- FLTWFranklin FTSE Taiwan ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns KLIP or KWEB?
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF has a net margin of -- compared to KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF's net margin of --. KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF's return on equity of -- beat KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KLIPKraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF-- -- -- KWEBKraneShares CSI China Internet ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About KLIP or KWEB?
KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF has higher upside potential than KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF, analysts believe KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF is more attractive than KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KLIPKraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF0 0 0 KWEBKraneShares CSI China Internet ETF0 0 0 -
Is KLIP or KWEB More Risky?
KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF has a beta of 0.510, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.981%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KLIP or KWEB?
KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.67 per share corresponding to a yield of 45.48%. KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF offers a yield of 2.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.03 per share. KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KLIP or KWEB?
KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF quarterly revenues of --. KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF's net income of -- is lower than KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF's net income of --. Notably, KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF is -- versus -- for KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KLIPKraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF-- -- -- -- KWEBKraneShares CSI China Internet ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns KLIP or TWN?
Taiwan Fund has a net margin of -- compared to KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF's net margin of --. KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF's return on equity of -- beat Taiwan Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KLIPKraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF-- -- -- TWNTaiwan Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About KLIP or TWN?
KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Taiwan Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF has higher upside potential than Taiwan Fund, analysts believe KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF is more attractive than Taiwan Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KLIPKraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF0 0 0 TWNTaiwan Fund0 0 0 -
Is KLIP or TWN More Risky?
KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Taiwan Fund has a beta of 1.251, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.103%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KLIP or TWN?
KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.67 per share corresponding to a yield of 45.48%. Taiwan Fund offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $7.40 per share. KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Taiwan Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KLIP or TWN?
KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Taiwan Fund quarterly revenues of --. KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF's net income of -- is lower than Taiwan Fund's net income of --. Notably, KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Taiwan Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF is -- versus -- for Taiwan Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KLIPKraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF-- -- -- -- TWNTaiwan Fund-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Ford Stock Undervalued Amid the EV Transition?
There is a lot going on in the electric vehicle…
Is Goldman Sachs Stock a Buy Sell or Hold?
When the Federal Reserve started hiking rates in 2022, banks’…
Stock Ideas
Buy
52
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Buy
56
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3T
P/E Ratio: 41x
Buy
51
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 33x
Alerts
Sell
49
SMTC alert for Mar 17
Semtech [SMTC] is down 0.49% over the past day.
Buy
62
PLPC alert for Mar 17
Preformed Line Products [PLPC] is up 3.8% over the past day.
Sell
50
NUTX alert for Mar 17
Nutex Health [NUTX] is up 4.82% over the past day.
