Is Goldman Sachs Stock a Buy Sell or Hold?
When the Federal Reserve started hiking rates in 2022, banks’…
Buy
72
CWEB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$48.37
Seasonality move
:
9.41%
Day range:
$47.33 - $48.63
52-week range:
$24.60 - $59.31
Dividend yield:
3.03%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
619.6K
Avg. volume:
1.1M
1-year change:
57.85%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CWEB
Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FNGO
MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KLIP
KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
QLD
ProShares Ultra QQQ
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
WEBL
Direxion Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CWEB
Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs
|
$48.27 | -- | -- | -- | $1.08 | 3.03% | -- |
|
FNGO
MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN
|
$75.37 | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
KLIP
KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF
|
$33.75 | -- | -- | -- | $0.67 | 45.48% | -- |
|
QLD
ProShares Ultra QQQ
|
$93.19 | -- | -- | -- | $0.06 | 0.29% | -- |
|
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
|
$61.89 | -- | -- | -- | $0.28 | 1.62% | -- |
|
WEBL
Direxion Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares
|
$20.68 | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CWEB
Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs
|
-- | -0.300 | -- | -- |
|
FNGO
MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN
|
-- | 1.639 | -- | -- |
|
KLIP
KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF
|
-- | -0.256 | -- | -- |
|
QLD
ProShares Ultra QQQ
|
-- | 1.974 | -- | -- |
|
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
|
-- | 3.012 | -- | -- |
|
WEBL
Direxion Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares
|
-- | 3.249 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CWEB
Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FNGO
MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KLIP
KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
QLD
ProShares Ultra QQQ
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
WEBL
Direxion Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CWEB or FNGO?
MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN has a net margin of -- compared to Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs's net margin of --. Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs's return on equity of -- beat MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CWEBDirexion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs-- -- -- FNGOMicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CWEB or FNGO?
Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs has higher upside potential than MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN, analysts believe Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs is more attractive than MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CWEBDirexion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs0 0 0 FNGOMicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN0 0 0 -
Is CWEB or FNGO More Risky?
Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs has a beta of 0.819, which suggesting that the stock is 18.073% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN has a beta of 2.489, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 148.937%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CWEB or FNGO?
Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs has a quarterly dividend of $1.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.03%. MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CWEB or FNGO?
Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN quarterly revenues of --. Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs's net income of -- is lower than MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN's net income of --. Notably, Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs is -- versus -- for MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CWEBDirexion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs-- -- -- -- FNGOMicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CWEB or KLIP?
KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs's net margin of --. Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs's return on equity of -- beat KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CWEBDirexion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs-- -- -- KLIPKraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CWEB or KLIP?
Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs has higher upside potential than KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF, analysts believe Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs is more attractive than KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CWEBDirexion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs0 0 0 KLIPKraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF0 0 0 -
Is CWEB or KLIP More Risky?
Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs has a beta of 0.819, which suggesting that the stock is 18.073% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CWEB or KLIP?
Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs has a quarterly dividend of $1.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.03%. KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF offers a yield of 45.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.67 per share. Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CWEB or KLIP?
Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF quarterly revenues of --. Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs's net income of -- is lower than KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF's net income of --. Notably, Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs is -- versus -- for KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CWEBDirexion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs-- -- -- -- KLIPKraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CWEB or QLD?
ProShares Ultra QQQ has a net margin of -- compared to Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs's net margin of --. Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs's return on equity of -- beat ProShares Ultra QQQ's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CWEBDirexion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs-- -- -- QLDProShares Ultra QQQ-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CWEB or QLD?
Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ProShares Ultra QQQ has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs has higher upside potential than ProShares Ultra QQQ, analysts believe Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs is more attractive than ProShares Ultra QQQ.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CWEBDirexion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs0 0 0 QLDProShares Ultra QQQ0 0 0 -
Is CWEB or QLD More Risky?
Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs has a beta of 0.819, which suggesting that the stock is 18.073% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ProShares Ultra QQQ has a beta of 2.276, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 127.583%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CWEB or QLD?
Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs has a quarterly dividend of $1.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.03%. ProShares Ultra QQQ offers a yield of 0.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ProShares Ultra QQQ pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CWEB or QLD?
Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ProShares Ultra QQQ quarterly revenues of --. Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs's net income of -- is lower than ProShares Ultra QQQ's net income of --. Notably, Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ProShares Ultra QQQ's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs is -- versus -- for ProShares Ultra QQQ. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CWEBDirexion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs-- -- -- -- QLDProShares Ultra QQQ-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CWEB or TQQQ?
ProShares UltraPro QQQ has a net margin of -- compared to Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs's net margin of --. Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs's return on equity of -- beat ProShares UltraPro QQQ's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CWEBDirexion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs-- -- -- TQQQProShares UltraPro QQQ-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CWEB or TQQQ?
Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ProShares UltraPro QQQ has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs has higher upside potential than ProShares UltraPro QQQ, analysts believe Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs is more attractive than ProShares UltraPro QQQ.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CWEBDirexion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs0 0 0 TQQQProShares UltraPro QQQ0 0 0 -
Is CWEB or TQQQ More Risky?
Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs has a beta of 0.819, which suggesting that the stock is 18.073% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ProShares UltraPro QQQ has a beta of 3.470, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 247%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CWEB or TQQQ?
Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs has a quarterly dividend of $1.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.03%. ProShares UltraPro QQQ offers a yield of 1.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ProShares UltraPro QQQ pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CWEB or TQQQ?
Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ProShares UltraPro QQQ quarterly revenues of --. Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs's net income of -- is lower than ProShares UltraPro QQQ's net income of --. Notably, Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ProShares UltraPro QQQ's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs is -- versus -- for ProShares UltraPro QQQ. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CWEBDirexion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs-- -- -- -- TQQQProShares UltraPro QQQ-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CWEB or WEBL?
Direxion Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares has a net margin of -- compared to Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs's net margin of --. Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs's return on equity of -- beat Direxion Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CWEBDirexion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs-- -- -- WEBLDirexion Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CWEB or WEBL?
Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Direxion Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs has higher upside potential than Direxion Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares, analysts believe Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs is more attractive than Direxion Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CWEBDirexion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs0 0 0 WEBLDirexion Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares0 0 0 -
Is CWEB or WEBL More Risky?
Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs has a beta of 0.819, which suggesting that the stock is 18.073% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Direxion Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares has a beta of 3.562, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 256.234%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CWEB or WEBL?
Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs has a quarterly dividend of $1.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.03%. Direxion Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Direxion Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CWEB or WEBL?
Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Direxion Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares quarterly revenues of --. Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs's net income of -- is lower than Direxion Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares's net income of --. Notably, Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Direxion Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs is -- versus -- for Direxion Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CWEBDirexion Daily CSI China Internet Idx Bull 2X Shs-- -- -- -- WEBLDirexion Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Reddit a Buy on the Dip?
Reddit (NYSE:RDDT) share price has been on the proverbial ropes…
Qualcomm Stock: 5G Leader at a Bargain Price?
Chip giant QUALCOMM Incorporated (NASDAQ:QCOM) was the ultimate chip company…
Stock Ideas
Buy
52
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Buy
56
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3T
P/E Ratio: 41x
Buy
51
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 33x
Alerts
Buy
59
GRRR alert for Mar 15
Gorilla Technology Group [GRRR] is up 29.72% over the past day.
Sell
49
SMTC alert for Mar 15
Semtech [SMTC] is up 21.28% over the past day.
Buy
62
PLPC alert for Mar 15
Preformed Line Products [PLPC] is up 17.38% over the past day.
