SPXC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Fastenal has a net margin of 10.38% compared to SPX Technologies's net margin of 15.61%. SPX Technologies's return on equity of 14.06% beat Fastenal's return on equity of 33.31%.

SPX Technologies has a consensus price target of $134.00, signalling upside risk potential of 21.91%. On the other hand Fastenal has an analysts' consensus of $66.88 which suggests that it could grow by 1.19%. Given that SPX Technologies has higher upside potential than Fastenal, analysts believe SPX Technologies is more attractive than Fastenal.

SPX Technologies has a beta of 1.265, which suggesting that the stock is 26.479% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fastenal has a beta of 0.996, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.399%.

SPX Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Fastenal offers a yield of 2.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. SPX Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fastenal pays out 88.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Fastenal's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SPX Technologies quarterly revenues are $483.7M, which are smaller than Fastenal quarterly revenues of $1.9B. SPX Technologies's net income of $50.2M is lower than Fastenal's net income of $298.1M. Notably, SPX Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.59x while Fastenal's PE ratio is 37.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SPX Technologies is 3.51x versus 5.74x for Fastenal. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ferguson Enterprises has a net margin of 10.38% compared to SPX Technologies's net margin of 6.05%. SPX Technologies's return on equity of 14.06% beat Ferguson Enterprises's return on equity of 30.58%.

SPX Technologies has a consensus price target of $134.00, signalling upside risk potential of 21.91%. On the other hand Ferguson Enterprises has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 25.16%. Given that Ferguson Enterprises has higher upside potential than SPX Technologies, analysts believe Ferguson Enterprises is more attractive than SPX Technologies.

SPX Technologies has a beta of 1.265, which suggesting that the stock is 26.479% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ferguson Enterprises has a beta of 1.234, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.394%.

SPX Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ferguson Enterprises offers a yield of 1.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. SPX Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ferguson Enterprises pays out 45.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Ferguson Enterprises's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SPX Technologies quarterly revenues are $483.7M, which are smaller than Ferguson Enterprises quarterly revenues of $7.8B. SPX Technologies's net income of $50.2M is lower than Ferguson Enterprises's net income of $470M. Notably, SPX Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.59x while Ferguson Enterprises's PE ratio is 21.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SPX Technologies is 3.51x versus 1.22x for Ferguson Enterprises. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Comfort Systems USA has a net margin of 10.38% compared to SPX Technologies's net margin of 8.07%. SPX Technologies's return on equity of 14.06% beat Comfort Systems USA's return on equity of 33.79%.

SPX Technologies has a consensus price target of $134.00, signalling upside risk potential of 21.91%. On the other hand Comfort Systems USA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 21.89%. Given that SPX Technologies has higher upside potential than Comfort Systems USA, analysts believe SPX Technologies is more attractive than Comfort Systems USA.

SPX Technologies has a beta of 1.265, which suggesting that the stock is 26.479% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Comfort Systems USA has a beta of 1.185, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.538%.

SPX Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Comfort Systems USA offers a yield of 0.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. SPX Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Comfort Systems USA pays out 9.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Comfort Systems USA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SPX Technologies quarterly revenues are $483.7M, which are smaller than Comfort Systems USA quarterly revenues of $1.8B. SPX Technologies's net income of $50.2M is lower than Comfort Systems USA's net income of $146.2M. Notably, SPX Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.59x while Comfort Systems USA's PE ratio is 33.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SPX Technologies is 3.51x versus 2.41x for Comfort Systems USA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

IES Holdings has a net margin of 10.38% compared to SPX Technologies's net margin of 8.14%. SPX Technologies's return on equity of 14.06% beat IES Holdings's return on equity of 37.82%.

SPX Technologies has a consensus price target of $134.00, signalling upside risk potential of 21.91%. On the other hand IES Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SPX Technologies has higher upside potential than IES Holdings, analysts believe SPX Technologies is more attractive than IES Holdings.

SPX Technologies has a beta of 1.265, which suggesting that the stock is 26.479% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IES Holdings has a beta of 1.452, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.178%.

SPX Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. IES Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SPX Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. IES Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SPX Technologies quarterly revenues are $483.7M, which are smaller than IES Holdings quarterly revenues of $775.8M. SPX Technologies's net income of $50.2M is lower than IES Holdings's net income of $63.2M. Notably, SPX Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.59x while IES Holdings's PE ratio is 21.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SPX Technologies is 3.51x versus 1.51x for IES Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.