FERG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Fastenal has a net margin of 4.02% compared to Ferguson Enterprises's net margin of 14.37%. Ferguson Enterprises's return on equity of 29.6% beat Fastenal's return on equity of 32.9%.

Ferguson Enterprises has a consensus price target of $193.05, signalling upside risk potential of 17.14%. On the other hand Fastenal has an analysts' consensus of $75.35 which suggests that it could fall by -3.41%. Given that Ferguson Enterprises has higher upside potential than Fastenal, analysts believe Ferguson Enterprises is more attractive than Fastenal.

Ferguson Enterprises has a beta of 1.162, which suggesting that the stock is 16.228% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fastenal has a beta of 1.046, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.641%.

Ferguson Enterprises has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.97%. Fastenal offers a yield of 2.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share. Ferguson Enterprises pays 45.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Fastenal pays out 77.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ferguson Enterprises quarterly revenues are $6.9B, which are larger than Fastenal quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Ferguson Enterprises's net income of $276M is higher than Fastenal's net income of $262.1M. Notably, Ferguson Enterprises's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.27x while Fastenal's PE ratio is 38.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ferguson Enterprises is 1.11x versus 5.94x for Fastenal. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Comfort Systems USA has a net margin of 4.02% compared to Ferguson Enterprises's net margin of 7.81%. Ferguson Enterprises's return on equity of 29.6% beat Comfort Systems USA's return on equity of 35.18%.

Ferguson Enterprises has a consensus price target of $193.05, signalling upside risk potential of 17.14%. On the other hand Comfort Systems USA has an analysts' consensus of $493.00 which suggests that it could grow by 44.03%. Given that Comfort Systems USA has higher upside potential than Ferguson Enterprises, analysts believe Comfort Systems USA is more attractive than Ferguson Enterprises.

Ferguson Enterprises has a beta of 1.162, which suggesting that the stock is 16.228% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Comfort Systems USA has a beta of 1.266, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.602%.

Ferguson Enterprises has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.97%. Comfort Systems USA offers a yield of 0.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Ferguson Enterprises pays 45.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Comfort Systems USA pays out 8.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ferguson Enterprises quarterly revenues are $6.9B, which are larger than Comfort Systems USA quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Ferguson Enterprises's net income of $276M is higher than Comfort Systems USA's net income of $145.9M. Notably, Ferguson Enterprises's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.27x while Comfort Systems USA's PE ratio is 23.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ferguson Enterprises is 1.11x versus 1.74x for Comfort Systems USA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

IES Holdings has a net margin of 4.02% compared to Ferguson Enterprises's net margin of 7.51%. Ferguson Enterprises's return on equity of 29.6% beat IES Holdings's return on equity of 37.95%.

Ferguson Enterprises has a consensus price target of $193.05, signalling upside risk potential of 17.14%. On the other hand IES Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ferguson Enterprises has higher upside potential than IES Holdings, analysts believe Ferguson Enterprises is more attractive than IES Holdings.

Ferguson Enterprises has a beta of 1.162, which suggesting that the stock is 16.228% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IES Holdings has a beta of 1.507, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.702%.

Ferguson Enterprises has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.97%. IES Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ferguson Enterprises pays 45.19% of its earnings as a dividend. IES Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ferguson Enterprises's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ferguson Enterprises quarterly revenues are $6.9B, which are larger than IES Holdings quarterly revenues of $749.5M. Ferguson Enterprises's net income of $276M is higher than IES Holdings's net income of $56.3M. Notably, Ferguson Enterprises's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.27x while IES Holdings's PE ratio is 16.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ferguson Enterprises is 1.11x versus 1.22x for IES Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SPX Technologies has a net margin of 4.02% compared to Ferguson Enterprises's net margin of 10.7%. Ferguson Enterprises's return on equity of 29.6% beat SPX Technologies's return on equity of 15.52%.

Ferguson Enterprises has a consensus price target of $193.05, signalling upside risk potential of 17.14%. On the other hand SPX Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $171.50 which suggests that it could grow by 26.46%. Given that SPX Technologies has higher upside potential than Ferguson Enterprises, analysts believe SPX Technologies is more attractive than Ferguson Enterprises.

Ferguson Enterprises has a beta of 1.162, which suggesting that the stock is 16.228% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SPX Technologies has a beta of 1.220, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.973%.

Ferguson Enterprises has a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.97%. SPX Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ferguson Enterprises pays 45.19% of its earnings as a dividend. SPX Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ferguson Enterprises's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ferguson Enterprises quarterly revenues are $6.9B, which are larger than SPX Technologies quarterly revenues of $533.7M. Ferguson Enterprises's net income of $276M is higher than SPX Technologies's net income of $57.1M. Notably, Ferguson Enterprises's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.27x while SPX Technologies's PE ratio is 31.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ferguson Enterprises is 1.11x versus 3.22x for SPX Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.