FAST Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

EMCOR Group has a net margin of 14.37% compared to Fastenal's net margin of 7.75%. Fastenal's return on equity of 32.9% beat EMCOR Group's return on equity of 37.22%.

Fastenal has a consensus price target of $75.35, signalling downside risk potential of -1.07%. On the other hand EMCOR Group has an analysts' consensus of $499.80 which suggests that it could grow by 34.76%. Given that EMCOR Group has higher upside potential than Fastenal, analysts believe EMCOR Group is more attractive than Fastenal.

Fastenal has a beta of 1.048, which suggesting that the stock is 4.817% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EMCOR Group has a beta of 1.136, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.558%.

Fastenal has a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.1%. EMCOR Group offers a yield of 0.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Fastenal pays 77.64% of its earnings as a dividend. EMCOR Group pays out 4.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fastenal quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are smaller than EMCOR Group quarterly revenues of $3.8B. Fastenal's net income of $262.1M is lower than EMCOR Group's net income of $292.2M. Notably, Fastenal's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.90x while EMCOR Group's PE ratio is 17.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fastenal is 5.80x versus 1.19x for EMCOR Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Comfort Systems USA has a net margin of 14.37% compared to Fastenal's net margin of 7.81%. Fastenal's return on equity of 32.9% beat Comfort Systems USA's return on equity of 35.18%.

Fastenal has a consensus price target of $75.35, signalling downside risk potential of -1.07%. On the other hand Comfort Systems USA has an analysts' consensus of $493.00 which suggests that it could grow by 52.11%. Given that Comfort Systems USA has higher upside potential than Fastenal, analysts believe Comfort Systems USA is more attractive than Fastenal.

Fastenal has a beta of 1.048, which suggesting that the stock is 4.817% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Comfort Systems USA has a beta of 1.236, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.62%.

Fastenal has a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.1%. Comfort Systems USA offers a yield of 0.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Fastenal pays 77.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Comfort Systems USA pays out 8.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fastenal quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are smaller than Comfort Systems USA quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Fastenal's net income of $262.1M is higher than Comfort Systems USA's net income of $145.9M. Notably, Fastenal's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.90x while Comfort Systems USA's PE ratio is 22.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fastenal is 5.80x versus 1.65x for Comfort Systems USA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

IES Holdings has a net margin of 14.37% compared to Fastenal's net margin of 7.51%. Fastenal's return on equity of 32.9% beat IES Holdings's return on equity of 37.95%.

Fastenal has a consensus price target of $75.35, signalling downside risk potential of -1.07%. On the other hand IES Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fastenal has higher upside potential than IES Holdings, analysts believe Fastenal is more attractive than IES Holdings.

Fastenal has a beta of 1.048, which suggesting that the stock is 4.817% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IES Holdings has a beta of 1.573, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.273%.

Fastenal has a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.1%. IES Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fastenal pays 77.64% of its earnings as a dividend. IES Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fastenal's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fastenal quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than IES Holdings quarterly revenues of $749.5M. Fastenal's net income of $262.1M is higher than IES Holdings's net income of $56.3M. Notably, Fastenal's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.90x while IES Holdings's PE ratio is 15.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fastenal is 5.80x versus 1.13x for IES Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Otis Worldwide has a net margin of 14.37% compared to Fastenal's net margin of 9.17%. Fastenal's return on equity of 32.9% beat Otis Worldwide's return on equity of --.

Fastenal has a consensus price target of $75.35, signalling downside risk potential of -1.07%. On the other hand Otis Worldwide has an analysts' consensus of $101.75 which suggests that it could fall by -0.35%. Given that Fastenal has more downside risk than Otis Worldwide, analysts believe Otis Worldwide is more attractive than Fastenal.

Fastenal has a beta of 1.048, which suggesting that the stock is 4.817% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Otis Worldwide has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Fastenal has a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.1%. Otis Worldwide offers a yield of 1.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. Fastenal pays 77.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Otis Worldwide pays out 36.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fastenal quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are smaller than Otis Worldwide quarterly revenues of $3.7B. Fastenal's net income of $262.1M is lower than Otis Worldwide's net income of $337M. Notably, Fastenal's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.90x while Otis Worldwide's PE ratio is 25.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fastenal is 5.80x versus 2.90x for Otis Worldwide. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.