SES Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Harley-Davidson has a net margin of -- compared to SES AI's net margin of 10.35%. SES AI's return on equity of -- beat Harley-Davidson's return on equity of 17.84%.

SES AI has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -21.26%. On the other hand Harley-Davidson has an analysts' consensus of $37.17 which suggests that it could grow by 33.69%. Given that Harley-Davidson has higher upside potential than SES AI, analysts believe Harley-Davidson is more attractive than SES AI.

SES AI has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Harley-Davidson has a beta of 1.483, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.316%.

SES AI has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Harley-Davidson offers a yield of 2.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. SES AI pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Harley-Davidson pays out 13.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Harley-Davidson's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SES AI quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Harley-Davidson quarterly revenues of $1.2B. SES AI's net income of -$30.2M is lower than Harley-Davidson's net income of $119M. Notably, SES AI's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Harley-Davidson's PE ratio is 6.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SES AI is -- versus 0.68x for Harley-Davidson. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Luminar Technologies has a net margin of -- compared to SES AI's net margin of -793.92%. SES AI's return on equity of -- beat Luminar Technologies's return on equity of --.

SES AI has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -21.26%. On the other hand Luminar Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $29.93 which suggests that it could grow by 304.44%. Given that Luminar Technologies has higher upside potential than SES AI, analysts believe Luminar Technologies is more attractive than SES AI.

SES AI has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Luminar Technologies has a beta of 1.603, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.272%.

SES AI has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Luminar Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SES AI pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Luminar Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SES AI quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Luminar Technologies quarterly revenues of $15.5M. SES AI's net income of -$30.2M is lower than Luminar Technologies's net income of $27.4M. Notably, SES AI's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Luminar Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SES AI is -- versus 2.93x for Luminar Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Miller Industries has a net margin of -- compared to SES AI's net margin of 4.91%. SES AI's return on equity of -- beat Miller Industries's return on equity of 19.16%.

SES AI has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -21.26%. On the other hand Miller Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 23.28%. Given that Miller Industries has higher upside potential than SES AI, analysts believe Miller Industries is more attractive than SES AI.

SES AI has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Miller Industries has a beta of 0.985, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.518%.

SES AI has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Miller Industries offers a yield of 1.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. SES AI pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Miller Industries pays out 14.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Miller Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SES AI quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Miller Industries quarterly revenues of $314.3M. SES AI's net income of -$30.2M is lower than Miller Industries's net income of $15.4M. Notably, SES AI's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Miller Industries's PE ratio is 10.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SES AI is -- versus 0.55x for Miller Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Worksport has a net margin of -- compared to SES AI's net margin of -132.43%. SES AI's return on equity of -- beat Worksport's return on equity of -87.2%.

SES AI has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -21.26%. On the other hand Worksport has an analysts' consensus of $1.75 which suggests that it could grow by 99.54%. Given that Worksport has higher upside potential than SES AI, analysts believe Worksport is more attractive than SES AI.

SES AI has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Worksport has a beta of 0.468, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.154%.

SES AI has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Worksport offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SES AI pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Worksport pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SES AI quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Worksport quarterly revenues of $3.1M. SES AI's net income of -$30.2M is lower than Worksport's net income of -$4.1M. Notably, SES AI's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Worksport's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SES AI is -- versus 3.28x for Worksport. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.