WKSP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Luminar Technologies has a net margin of -132.43% compared to Worksport's net margin of -793.92%. Worksport's return on equity of -87.2% beat Luminar Technologies's return on equity of --.

Worksport has a consensus price target of $1.75, signalling upside risk potential of 99.54%. On the other hand Luminar Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $29.93 which suggests that it could grow by 304.44%. Given that Luminar Technologies has higher upside potential than Worksport, analysts believe Luminar Technologies is more attractive than Worksport.

Worksport has a beta of 0.468, which suggesting that the stock is 53.154% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Luminar Technologies has a beta of 1.603, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.272%.

Worksport has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Luminar Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Worksport pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Luminar Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Worksport quarterly revenues are $3.1M, which are smaller than Luminar Technologies quarterly revenues of $15.5M. Worksport's net income of -$4.1M is lower than Luminar Technologies's net income of $27.4M. Notably, Worksport's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Luminar Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Worksport is 3.28x versus 2.93x for Luminar Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Miller Industries has a net margin of -132.43% compared to Worksport's net margin of 4.91%. Worksport's return on equity of -87.2% beat Miller Industries's return on equity of 19.16%.

Worksport has a consensus price target of $1.75, signalling upside risk potential of 99.54%. On the other hand Miller Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 23.28%. Given that Worksport has higher upside potential than Miller Industries, analysts believe Worksport is more attractive than Miller Industries.

Worksport has a beta of 0.468, which suggesting that the stock is 53.154% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Miller Industries has a beta of 0.985, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.518%.

Worksport has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Miller Industries offers a yield of 1.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. Worksport pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Miller Industries pays out 14.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Miller Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Worksport quarterly revenues are $3.1M, which are smaller than Miller Industries quarterly revenues of $314.3M. Worksport's net income of -$4.1M is lower than Miller Industries's net income of $15.4M. Notably, Worksport's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Miller Industries's PE ratio is 10.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Worksport is 3.28x versus 0.55x for Miller Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SES AI has a net margin of -132.43% compared to Worksport's net margin of --. Worksport's return on equity of -87.2% beat SES AI's return on equity of --.

Worksport has a consensus price target of $1.75, signalling upside risk potential of 99.54%. On the other hand SES AI has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -21.26%. Given that Worksport has higher upside potential than SES AI, analysts believe Worksport is more attractive than SES AI.

Worksport has a beta of 0.468, which suggesting that the stock is 53.154% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SES AI has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Worksport has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SES AI offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Worksport pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SES AI pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Worksport quarterly revenues are $3.1M, which are larger than SES AI quarterly revenues of --. Worksport's net income of -$4.1M is higher than SES AI's net income of -$30.2M. Notably, Worksport's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SES AI's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Worksport is 3.28x versus -- for SES AI. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla has a net margin of -132.43% compared to Worksport's net margin of 8.61%. Worksport's return on equity of -87.2% beat Tesla's return on equity of 19.77%.

Worksport has a consensus price target of $1.75, signalling upside risk potential of 99.54%. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $296.71 which suggests that it could fall by -24.83%. Given that Worksport has higher upside potential than Tesla, analysts believe Worksport is more attractive than Tesla.

Worksport has a beta of 0.468, which suggesting that the stock is 53.154% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.301, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 130.123%.

Worksport has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Worksport pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Worksport quarterly revenues are $3.1M, which are smaller than Tesla quarterly revenues of $25.2B. Worksport's net income of -$4.1M is lower than Tesla's net income of $2.2B. Notably, Worksport's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Tesla's PE ratio is 108.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Worksport is 3.28x versus 14.18x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.