MLR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hyliion Holdings has a net margin of 4.91% compared to Miller Industries's net margin of --. Miller Industries's return on equity of 19.16% beat Hyliion Holdings's return on equity of --.

Miller Industries has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 23.28%. On the other hand Hyliion Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -10.31%. Given that Miller Industries has higher upside potential than Hyliion Holdings, analysts believe Miller Industries is more attractive than Hyliion Holdings.

Miller Industries has a beta of 0.985, which suggesting that the stock is 1.518% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyliion Holdings has a beta of 2.097, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 109.703%.

Miller Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.2%. Hyliion Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Miller Industries pays 14.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Hyliion Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Miller Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Miller Industries quarterly revenues are $314.3M, which are larger than Hyliion Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Miller Industries's net income of $15.4M is higher than Hyliion Holdings's net income of -$11.2M. Notably, Miller Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.49x while Hyliion Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Miller Industries is 0.55x versus 223.64x for Hyliion Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Luminar Technologies has a net margin of 4.91% compared to Miller Industries's net margin of -793.92%. Miller Industries's return on equity of 19.16% beat Luminar Technologies's return on equity of --.

Miller Industries has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 23.28%. On the other hand Luminar Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $29.93 which suggests that it could grow by 304.44%. Given that Luminar Technologies has higher upside potential than Miller Industries, analysts believe Luminar Technologies is more attractive than Miller Industries.

Miller Industries has a beta of 0.985, which suggesting that the stock is 1.518% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Luminar Technologies has a beta of 1.603, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.272%.

Miller Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.2%. Luminar Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Miller Industries pays 14.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Luminar Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Miller Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Miller Industries quarterly revenues are $314.3M, which are larger than Luminar Technologies quarterly revenues of $15.5M. Miller Industries's net income of $15.4M is lower than Luminar Technologies's net income of $27.4M. Notably, Miller Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.49x while Luminar Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Miller Industries is 0.55x versus 2.93x for Luminar Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SES AI has a net margin of 4.91% compared to Miller Industries's net margin of --. Miller Industries's return on equity of 19.16% beat SES AI's return on equity of --.

Miller Industries has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 23.28%. On the other hand SES AI has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -21.26%. Given that Miller Industries has higher upside potential than SES AI, analysts believe Miller Industries is more attractive than SES AI.

Miller Industries has a beta of 0.985, which suggesting that the stock is 1.518% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SES AI has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Miller Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.2%. SES AI offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Miller Industries pays 14.15% of its earnings as a dividend. SES AI pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Miller Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Miller Industries quarterly revenues are $314.3M, which are larger than SES AI quarterly revenues of --. Miller Industries's net income of $15.4M is higher than SES AI's net income of -$30.2M. Notably, Miller Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.49x while SES AI's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Miller Industries is 0.55x versus -- for SES AI. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Worksport has a net margin of 4.91% compared to Miller Industries's net margin of -132.43%. Miller Industries's return on equity of 19.16% beat Worksport's return on equity of -87.2%.

Miller Industries has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 23.28%. On the other hand Worksport has an analysts' consensus of $1.75 which suggests that it could grow by 99.54%. Given that Worksport has higher upside potential than Miller Industries, analysts believe Worksport is more attractive than Miller Industries.

Miller Industries has a beta of 0.985, which suggesting that the stock is 1.518% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Worksport has a beta of 0.468, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.154%.

Miller Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.2%. Worksport offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Miller Industries pays 14.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Worksport pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Miller Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Miller Industries quarterly revenues are $314.3M, which are larger than Worksport quarterly revenues of $3.1M. Miller Industries's net income of $15.4M is higher than Worksport's net income of -$4.1M. Notably, Miller Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.49x while Worksport's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Miller Industries is 0.55x versus 3.28x for Worksport. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.