Financhill
Buy
53

PRA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$23.05
Seasonality move :
-1.58%
Day range:
$22.87 - $23.29
52-week range:
$10.76 - $17.79
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
15.24x
P/S ratio:
0.71x
P/B ratio:
0.66x
Volume:
291.1K
Avg. volume:
234.4K
1-year change:
29.93%
Market cap:
$795M
Revenue:
$1.1B
EPS (TTM):
$1.02

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
PRA
ProAssurance
$274.6M $0.19 -3.24% 111.11% $18.25
ALL
Allstate
$16.2B $6.28 7.62% -19.37% $225.06
CNA
CNA Financial
$3.6B $1.21 8.5% -0.4% $48.00
HCI
HCI Group
$175.1M -$2.41 4.11% 19.16% $158.25
MCY
Mercury General
$1.4B $0.64 7.05% -100% $80.00
UFCS
United Fire Group
$327.7M $0.66 13.58% 17.31% $30.00
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
PRA
ProAssurance
$15.54 $18.25 $795M 15.24x $0.00 0% 0.71x
ALL
Allstate
$204.87 $225.06 $54.3B 12.06x $1.00 1.84% 0.86x
CNA
CNA Financial
$49.26 $48.00 $13.3B 13.99x $2.46 3.61% 0.96x
HCI
HCI Group
$136.23 $158.25 $1.5B 15.48x $0.40 1.18% 2.21x
MCY
Mercury General
$57.03 $80.00 $3.2B 6.75x $0.32 2.23% 0.58x
UFCS
United Fire Group
$28.75 $30.00 $729.7M 12.08x $0.16 2.23% 0.59x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
PRA
ProAssurance
26.12% 0.435 52.2% 29.87x
ALL
Allstate
27.38% 0.924 15.25% --
CNA
CNA Financial
22.05% 0.802 22.69% 22.94x
HCI
HCI Group
29.01% 0.095 14.58% 35.29x
MCY
Mercury General
22.78% 0.826 15.59% 6.79x
UFCS
United Fire Group
13.03% 2.075 16.21% --
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
PRA
ProAssurance
-- -- 3.33% 4.55% 8.47% -$2.6M
ALL
Allstate
-- -- 17.03% 24.09% 15.45% $1.7B
CNA
CNA Financial
-- -- 7.25% 9.46% 1.47% $665M
HCI
HCI Group
-- -- 16.64% 24.85% 5.67% $73.6M
MCY
Mercury General
-- -- 20.38% 27.18% 9.59% $236M
UFCS
United Fire Group
-- -- 7.35% 8.23% 12.67% $153.4M

ProAssurance vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns PRA or ALL?

    Allstate has a net margin of 5.69% compared to ProAssurance's net margin of 11.68%. ProAssurance's return on equity of 4.55% beat Allstate's return on equity of 24.09%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    PRA
    ProAssurance
    -- $0.31 $1.6B
    ALL
    Allstate
    -- $7.07 $29.5B
  • What do Analysts Say About PRA or ALL?

    ProAssurance has a consensus price target of $18.25, signalling upside risk potential of 17.44%. On the other hand Allstate has an analysts' consensus of $225.06 which suggests that it could grow by 9.86%. Given that ProAssurance has higher upside potential than Allstate, analysts believe ProAssurance is more attractive than Allstate.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    PRA
    ProAssurance
    0 4 0
    ALL
    Allstate
    9 2 1
  • Is PRA or ALL More Risky?

    ProAssurance has a beta of 0.210, which suggesting that the stock is 78.983% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Allstate has a beta of 0.472, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.839%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock PRA or ALL?

    ProAssurance has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Allstate offers a yield of 1.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. ProAssurance pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Allstate pays out 23.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Allstate's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios PRA or ALL?

    ProAssurance quarterly revenues are $284.3M, which are smaller than Allstate quarterly revenues of $16.5B. ProAssurance's net income of $16.2M is lower than Allstate's net income of $1.9B. Notably, ProAssurance's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.24x while Allstate's PE ratio is 12.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProAssurance is 0.71x versus 0.86x for Allstate. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    PRA
    ProAssurance
    0.71x 15.24x $284.3M $16.2M
    ALL
    Allstate
    0.86x 12.06x $16.5B $1.9B
  • Which has Higher Returns PRA or CNA?

    CNA Financial has a net margin of 5.69% compared to ProAssurance's net margin of 0.58%. ProAssurance's return on equity of 4.55% beat CNA Financial's return on equity of 9.46%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    PRA
    ProAssurance
    -- $0.31 $1.6B
    CNA
    CNA Financial
    -- $0.07 $13.5B
  • What do Analysts Say About PRA or CNA?

    ProAssurance has a consensus price target of $18.25, signalling upside risk potential of 17.44%. On the other hand CNA Financial has an analysts' consensus of $48.00 which suggests that it could fall by -2.56%. Given that ProAssurance has higher upside potential than CNA Financial, analysts believe ProAssurance is more attractive than CNA Financial.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    PRA
    ProAssurance
    0 4 0
    CNA
    CNA Financial
    0 1 0
  • Is PRA or CNA More Risky?

    ProAssurance has a beta of 0.210, which suggesting that the stock is 78.983% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CNA Financial has a beta of 0.680, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.011%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock PRA or CNA?

    ProAssurance has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CNA Financial offers a yield of 3.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.46 per share. ProAssurance pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CNA Financial pays out 106.88% of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios PRA or CNA?

    ProAssurance quarterly revenues are $284.3M, which are smaller than CNA Financial quarterly revenues of $3.6B. ProAssurance's net income of $16.2M is lower than CNA Financial's net income of $21M. Notably, ProAssurance's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.24x while CNA Financial's PE ratio is 13.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProAssurance is 0.71x versus 0.96x for CNA Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    PRA
    ProAssurance
    0.71x 15.24x $284.3M $16.2M
    CNA
    CNA Financial
    0.96x 13.99x $3.6B $21M
  • Which has Higher Returns PRA or HCI?

    HCI Group has a net margin of 5.69% compared to ProAssurance's net margin of 1.6%. ProAssurance's return on equity of 4.55% beat HCI Group's return on equity of 24.85%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    PRA
    ProAssurance
    -- $0.31 $1.6B
    HCI
    HCI Group
    -- $0.23 $654.3M
  • What do Analysts Say About PRA or HCI?

    ProAssurance has a consensus price target of $18.25, signalling upside risk potential of 17.44%. On the other hand HCI Group has an analysts' consensus of $158.25 which suggests that it could grow by 16.16%. Given that ProAssurance has higher upside potential than HCI Group, analysts believe ProAssurance is more attractive than HCI Group.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    PRA
    ProAssurance
    0 4 0
    HCI
    HCI Group
    3 1 0
  • Is PRA or HCI More Risky?

    ProAssurance has a beta of 0.210, which suggesting that the stock is 78.983% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison HCI Group has a beta of 1.141, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.064%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock PRA or HCI?

    ProAssurance has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. HCI Group offers a yield of 1.18% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. ProAssurance pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. HCI Group pays out 15.1% of its earnings as a dividend. HCI Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios PRA or HCI?

    ProAssurance quarterly revenues are $284.3M, which are larger than HCI Group quarterly revenues of $161.4M. ProAssurance's net income of $16.2M is higher than HCI Group's net income of $2.6M. Notably, ProAssurance's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.24x while HCI Group's PE ratio is 15.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProAssurance is 0.71x versus 2.21x for HCI Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    PRA
    ProAssurance
    0.71x 15.24x $284.3M $16.2M
    HCI
    HCI Group
    2.21x 15.48x $161.4M $2.6M
  • Which has Higher Returns PRA or MCY?

    Mercury General has a net margin of 5.69% compared to ProAssurance's net margin of 7.4%. ProAssurance's return on equity of 4.55% beat Mercury General's return on equity of 27.18%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    PRA
    ProAssurance
    -- $0.31 $1.6B
    MCY
    Mercury General
    -- $1.82 $2.5B
  • What do Analysts Say About PRA or MCY?

    ProAssurance has a consensus price target of $18.25, signalling upside risk potential of 17.44%. On the other hand Mercury General has an analysts' consensus of $80.00 which suggests that it could grow by 40.28%. Given that Mercury General has higher upside potential than ProAssurance, analysts believe Mercury General is more attractive than ProAssurance.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    PRA
    ProAssurance
    0 4 0
    MCY
    Mercury General
    1 0 0
  • Is PRA or MCY More Risky?

    ProAssurance has a beta of 0.210, which suggesting that the stock is 78.983% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mercury General has a beta of 0.804, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.595%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock PRA or MCY?

    ProAssurance has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mercury General offers a yield of 2.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share. ProAssurance pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mercury General pays out 15.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Mercury General's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios PRA or MCY?

    ProAssurance quarterly revenues are $284.3M, which are smaller than Mercury General quarterly revenues of $1.4B. ProAssurance's net income of $16.2M is lower than Mercury General's net income of $101.1M. Notably, ProAssurance's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.24x while Mercury General's PE ratio is 6.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProAssurance is 0.71x versus 0.58x for Mercury General. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    PRA
    ProAssurance
    0.71x 15.24x $284.3M $16.2M
    MCY
    Mercury General
    0.58x 6.75x $1.4B $101.1M
  • Which has Higher Returns PRA or UFCS?

    United Fire Group has a net margin of 5.69% compared to ProAssurance's net margin of 9.48%. ProAssurance's return on equity of 4.55% beat United Fire Group's return on equity of 8.23%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    PRA
    ProAssurance
    -- $0.31 $1.6B
    UFCS
    United Fire Group
    -- $1.21 $898.6M
  • What do Analysts Say About PRA or UFCS?

    ProAssurance has a consensus price target of $18.25, signalling upside risk potential of 17.44%. On the other hand United Fire Group has an analysts' consensus of $30.00 which suggests that it could grow by 4.35%. Given that ProAssurance has higher upside potential than United Fire Group, analysts believe ProAssurance is more attractive than United Fire Group.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    PRA
    ProAssurance
    0 4 0
    UFCS
    United Fire Group
    1 1 0
  • Is PRA or UFCS More Risky?

    ProAssurance has a beta of 0.210, which suggesting that the stock is 78.983% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison United Fire Group has a beta of 0.454, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.625%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock PRA or UFCS?

    ProAssurance has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. United Fire Group offers a yield of 2.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. ProAssurance pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. United Fire Group pays out 26.17% of its earnings as a dividend. United Fire Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios PRA or UFCS?

    ProAssurance quarterly revenues are $284.3M, which are smaller than United Fire Group quarterly revenues of $331.7M. ProAssurance's net income of $16.2M is lower than United Fire Group's net income of $31.4M. Notably, ProAssurance's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.24x while United Fire Group's PE ratio is 12.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProAssurance is 0.71x versus 0.59x for United Fire Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    PRA
    ProAssurance
    0.71x 15.24x $284.3M $16.2M
    UFCS
    United Fire Group
    0.59x 12.08x $331.7M $31.4M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Is Roblox Stock a Buy, Sell or Hold?
Is Roblox Stock a Buy, Sell or Hold?

Gaming company Roblox (NYSE:RBLX) operates a massive platform that allows…

Is Shopify a Millionaire Maker?
Is Shopify a Millionaire Maker?

Shopify (NYSE:SHOP) is an eCommerce platform, business services provider and…

Is Alphabet Stock No Longer a Good Bet?
Is Alphabet Stock No Longer a Good Bet?

Alphabet tripled its price per share over the past 5…

Stock Ideas

Buy
52
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 35x

Sell
50
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 33x

Buy
54
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x

Alerts

Buy
82
EXOD alert for Mar 20

Exodus Movement [EXOD] is up 17.89% over the past day.

Buy
69
SIG alert for Mar 20

Signet Jewelers [SIG] is down 0.64% over the past day.

Sell
36
HQY alert for Mar 20

HealthEquity [HQY] is up 0.28% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock