PRA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CNA Financial has a net margin of 5.69% compared to ProAssurance's net margin of 0.58%. ProAssurance's return on equity of 4.55% beat CNA Financial's return on equity of 9.46%.

ProAssurance has a consensus price target of $18.25, signalling upside risk potential of 17.44%. On the other hand CNA Financial has an analysts' consensus of $48.00 which suggests that it could fall by -2.56%. Given that ProAssurance has higher upside potential than CNA Financial, analysts believe ProAssurance is more attractive than CNA Financial.

ProAssurance has a beta of 0.210, which suggesting that the stock is 78.983% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CNA Financial has a beta of 0.680, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.011%.

ProAssurance has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CNA Financial offers a yield of 3.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.46 per share. ProAssurance pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CNA Financial pays out 106.88% of its earnings as a dividend.

ProAssurance quarterly revenues are $284.3M, which are smaller than CNA Financial quarterly revenues of $3.6B. ProAssurance's net income of $16.2M is lower than CNA Financial's net income of $21M. Notably, ProAssurance's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.24x while CNA Financial's PE ratio is 13.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProAssurance is 0.71x versus 0.96x for CNA Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

HCI Group has a net margin of 5.69% compared to ProAssurance's net margin of 1.6%. ProAssurance's return on equity of 4.55% beat HCI Group's return on equity of 24.85%.

ProAssurance has a consensus price target of $18.25, signalling upside risk potential of 17.44%. On the other hand HCI Group has an analysts' consensus of $158.25 which suggests that it could grow by 16.16%. Given that ProAssurance has higher upside potential than HCI Group, analysts believe ProAssurance is more attractive than HCI Group.

ProAssurance has a beta of 0.210, which suggesting that the stock is 78.983% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison HCI Group has a beta of 1.141, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.064%.

ProAssurance has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. HCI Group offers a yield of 1.18% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. ProAssurance pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. HCI Group pays out 15.1% of its earnings as a dividend. HCI Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ProAssurance quarterly revenues are $284.3M, which are larger than HCI Group quarterly revenues of $161.4M. ProAssurance's net income of $16.2M is higher than HCI Group's net income of $2.6M. Notably, ProAssurance's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.24x while HCI Group's PE ratio is 15.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProAssurance is 0.71x versus 2.21x for HCI Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mercury General has a net margin of 5.69% compared to ProAssurance's net margin of 7.4%. ProAssurance's return on equity of 4.55% beat Mercury General's return on equity of 27.18%.

ProAssurance has a consensus price target of $18.25, signalling upside risk potential of 17.44%. On the other hand Mercury General has an analysts' consensus of $80.00 which suggests that it could grow by 40.28%. Given that Mercury General has higher upside potential than ProAssurance, analysts believe Mercury General is more attractive than ProAssurance.

ProAssurance has a beta of 0.210, which suggesting that the stock is 78.983% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mercury General has a beta of 0.804, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.595%.

ProAssurance has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mercury General offers a yield of 2.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share. ProAssurance pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mercury General pays out 15.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Mercury General's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ProAssurance quarterly revenues are $284.3M, which are smaller than Mercury General quarterly revenues of $1.4B. ProAssurance's net income of $16.2M is lower than Mercury General's net income of $101.1M. Notably, ProAssurance's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.24x while Mercury General's PE ratio is 6.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProAssurance is 0.71x versus 0.58x for Mercury General. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

United Fire Group has a net margin of 5.69% compared to ProAssurance's net margin of 9.48%. ProAssurance's return on equity of 4.55% beat United Fire Group's return on equity of 8.23%.

ProAssurance has a consensus price target of $18.25, signalling upside risk potential of 17.44%. On the other hand United Fire Group has an analysts' consensus of $30.00 which suggests that it could grow by 4.35%. Given that ProAssurance has higher upside potential than United Fire Group, analysts believe ProAssurance is more attractive than United Fire Group.

ProAssurance has a beta of 0.210, which suggesting that the stock is 78.983% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison United Fire Group has a beta of 0.454, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.625%.

ProAssurance has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. United Fire Group offers a yield of 2.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. ProAssurance pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. United Fire Group pays out 26.17% of its earnings as a dividend. United Fire Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ProAssurance quarterly revenues are $284.3M, which are smaller than United Fire Group quarterly revenues of $331.7M. ProAssurance's net income of $16.2M is lower than United Fire Group's net income of $31.4M. Notably, ProAssurance's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.24x while United Fire Group's PE ratio is 12.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProAssurance is 0.71x versus 0.59x for United Fire Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.