HCI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Progressive has a net margin of 1.6% compared to HCI Group's net margin of 11.63%. HCI Group's return on equity of 24.85% beat Progressive's return on equity of 35.88%.

HCI Group has a consensus price target of $158.25, signalling upside risk potential of 16.16%. On the other hand Progressive has an analysts' consensus of $289.4118 which suggests that it could grow by 5.77%. Given that HCI Group has higher upside potential than Progressive, analysts believe HCI Group is more attractive than Progressive.

HCI Group has a beta of 1.141, which suggesting that the stock is 14.064% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Progressive has a beta of 0.350, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 64.961%.

HCI Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.18%. Progressive offers a yield of 1.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $4.60 per share. HCI Group pays 15.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Progressive pays out 8.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

HCI Group quarterly revenues are $161.4M, which are smaller than Progressive quarterly revenues of $20.3B. HCI Group's net income of $2.6M is lower than Progressive's net income of $2.4B. Notably, HCI Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.48x while Progressive's PE ratio is 18.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HCI Group is 2.21x versus 2.13x for Progressive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ProAssurance has a net margin of 1.6% compared to HCI Group's net margin of 5.69%. HCI Group's return on equity of 24.85% beat ProAssurance's return on equity of 4.55%.

HCI Group has a consensus price target of $158.25, signalling upside risk potential of 16.16%. On the other hand ProAssurance has an analysts' consensus of $18.25 which suggests that it could grow by 17.44%. Given that ProAssurance has higher upside potential than HCI Group, analysts believe ProAssurance is more attractive than HCI Group.

HCI Group has a beta of 1.141, which suggesting that the stock is 14.064% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ProAssurance has a beta of 0.210, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 78.983%.

HCI Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.18%. ProAssurance offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. HCI Group pays 15.1% of its earnings as a dividend. ProAssurance pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. HCI Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

HCI Group quarterly revenues are $161.4M, which are smaller than ProAssurance quarterly revenues of $284.3M. HCI Group's net income of $2.6M is lower than ProAssurance's net income of $16.2M. Notably, HCI Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.48x while ProAssurance's PE ratio is 15.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HCI Group is 2.21x versus 0.71x for ProAssurance. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Hanover Insurance Group has a net margin of 1.6% compared to HCI Group's net margin of 10.64%. HCI Group's return on equity of 24.85% beat The Hanover Insurance Group's return on equity of 16.06%.

HCI Group has a consensus price target of $158.25, signalling upside risk potential of 16.16%. On the other hand The Hanover Insurance Group has an analysts' consensus of $179.71 which suggests that it could grow by 5.32%. Given that HCI Group has higher upside potential than The Hanover Insurance Group, analysts believe HCI Group is more attractive than The Hanover Insurance Group.

HCI Group has a beta of 1.141, which suggesting that the stock is 14.064% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Hanover Insurance Group has a beta of 0.648, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.169%.

HCI Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.18%. The Hanover Insurance Group offers a yield of 2.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.90 per share. HCI Group pays 15.1% of its earnings as a dividend. The Hanover Insurance Group pays out 29.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

HCI Group quarterly revenues are $161.4M, which are smaller than The Hanover Insurance Group quarterly revenues of $1.6B. HCI Group's net income of $2.6M is lower than The Hanover Insurance Group's net income of $167.9M. Notably, HCI Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.48x while The Hanover Insurance Group's PE ratio is 14.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HCI Group is 2.21x versus 1.00x for The Hanover Insurance Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Universal Insurance Holdings has a net margin of 1.6% compared to HCI Group's net margin of 1.56%. HCI Group's return on equity of 24.85% beat Universal Insurance Holdings's return on equity of 15.73%.

HCI Group has a consensus price target of $158.25, signalling upside risk potential of 16.16%. On the other hand Universal Insurance Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $27.00 which suggests that it could grow by 25.58%. Given that Universal Insurance Holdings has higher upside potential than HCI Group, analysts believe Universal Insurance Holdings is more attractive than HCI Group.

HCI Group has a beta of 1.141, which suggesting that the stock is 14.064% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Universal Insurance Holdings has a beta of 0.844, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.601%.

HCI Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.18%. Universal Insurance Holdings offers a yield of 2.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. HCI Group pays 15.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Universal Insurance Holdings pays out 37.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

HCI Group quarterly revenues are $161.4M, which are smaller than Universal Insurance Holdings quarterly revenues of $384.8M. HCI Group's net income of $2.6M is lower than Universal Insurance Holdings's net income of $6M. Notably, HCI Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.48x while Universal Insurance Holdings's PE ratio is 10.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HCI Group is 2.21x versus 0.41x for Universal Insurance Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.