MCY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Allstate has a net margin of 7.4% compared to Mercury General's net margin of 11.68%. Mercury General's return on equity of 27.18% beat Allstate's return on equity of 24.09%.

Mercury General has a consensus price target of $80.00, signalling upside risk potential of 44.2%. On the other hand Allstate has an analysts' consensus of $225.06 which suggests that it could grow by 11.42%. Given that Mercury General has higher upside potential than Allstate, analysts believe Mercury General is more attractive than Allstate.

Mercury General has a beta of 0.804, which suggesting that the stock is 19.595% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Allstate has a beta of 0.472, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.839%.

Mercury General has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.29%. Allstate offers a yield of 1.86% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. Mercury General pays 15.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Allstate pays out 23.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mercury General quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than Allstate quarterly revenues of $16.5B. Mercury General's net income of $101.1M is lower than Allstate's net income of $1.9B. Notably, Mercury General's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.57x while Allstate's PE ratio is 11.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mercury General is 0.56x versus 0.84x for Allstate. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Progressive has a net margin of 7.4% compared to Mercury General's net margin of 11.63%. Mercury General's return on equity of 27.18% beat Progressive's return on equity of 35.88%.

Mercury General has a consensus price target of $80.00, signalling upside risk potential of 44.2%. On the other hand Progressive has an analysts' consensus of $287.0588 which suggests that it could grow by 2.74%. Given that Mercury General has higher upside potential than Progressive, analysts believe Mercury General is more attractive than Progressive.

Mercury General has a beta of 0.804, which suggesting that the stock is 19.595% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Progressive has a beta of 0.350, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 64.961%.

Mercury General has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.29%. Progressive offers a yield of 1.75% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $4.60 per share. Mercury General pays 15.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Progressive pays out 8.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mercury General quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than Progressive quarterly revenues of $20.3B. Mercury General's net income of $101.1M is lower than Progressive's net income of $2.4B. Notably, Mercury General's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.57x while Progressive's PE ratio is 19.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mercury General is 0.56x versus 2.18x for Progressive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ProAssurance has a net margin of 7.4% compared to Mercury General's net margin of 5.69%. Mercury General's return on equity of 27.18% beat ProAssurance's return on equity of 4.55%.

Mercury General has a consensus price target of $80.00, signalling upside risk potential of 44.2%. On the other hand ProAssurance has an analysts' consensus of $18.25 which suggests that it could grow by 18.89%. Given that Mercury General has higher upside potential than ProAssurance, analysts believe Mercury General is more attractive than ProAssurance.

Mercury General has a beta of 0.804, which suggesting that the stock is 19.595% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ProAssurance has a beta of 0.210, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 78.983%.

Mercury General has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.29%. ProAssurance offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mercury General pays 15.03% of its earnings as a dividend. ProAssurance pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mercury General's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mercury General quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than ProAssurance quarterly revenues of $284.3M. Mercury General's net income of $101.1M is higher than ProAssurance's net income of $16.2M. Notably, Mercury General's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.57x while ProAssurance's PE ratio is 15.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mercury General is 0.56x versus 0.70x for ProAssurance. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Travelers Companies has a net margin of 7.4% compared to Mercury General's net margin of 17.33%. Mercury General's return on equity of 27.18% beat The Travelers Companies's return on equity of 19.17%.

Mercury General has a consensus price target of $80.00, signalling upside risk potential of 44.2%. On the other hand The Travelers Companies has an analysts' consensus of $269.15 which suggests that it could grow by 5.16%. Given that Mercury General has higher upside potential than The Travelers Companies, analysts believe Mercury General is more attractive than The Travelers Companies.

Mercury General has a beta of 0.804, which suggesting that the stock is 19.595% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Travelers Companies has a beta of 0.606, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.388%.

Mercury General has a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.29%. The Travelers Companies offers a yield of 1.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.05 per share. Mercury General pays 15.03% of its earnings as a dividend. The Travelers Companies pays out 19.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mercury General quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than The Travelers Companies quarterly revenues of $12B. Mercury General's net income of $101.1M is lower than The Travelers Companies's net income of $2.1B. Notably, Mercury General's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.57x while The Travelers Companies's PE ratio is 11.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mercury General is 0.56x versus 1.27x for The Travelers Companies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.