UVE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

HCI Group has a net margin of 1.56% compared to Universal Insurance Holdings's net margin of 1.6%. Universal Insurance Holdings's return on equity of 15.73% beat HCI Group's return on equity of 24.85%.

Universal Insurance Holdings has a consensus price target of $27.00, signalling upside risk potential of 23.85%. On the other hand HCI Group has an analysts' consensus of $158.25 which suggests that it could grow by 14.11%. Given that Universal Insurance Holdings has higher upside potential than HCI Group, analysts believe Universal Insurance Holdings is more attractive than HCI Group.

Universal Insurance Holdings has a beta of 0.844, which suggesting that the stock is 15.601% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison HCI Group has a beta of 1.141, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.064%.

Universal Insurance Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.94%. HCI Group offers a yield of 1.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Universal Insurance Holdings pays 37.89% of its earnings as a dividend. HCI Group pays out 15.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Universal Insurance Holdings quarterly revenues are $384.8M, which are larger than HCI Group quarterly revenues of $161.4M. Universal Insurance Holdings's net income of $6M is higher than HCI Group's net income of $2.6M. Notably, Universal Insurance Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.95x while HCI Group's PE ratio is 15.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Universal Insurance Holdings is 0.42x versus 2.25x for HCI Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Safety Insurance Group has a net margin of 1.56% compared to Universal Insurance Holdings's net margin of 2.86%. Universal Insurance Holdings's return on equity of 15.73% beat Safety Insurance Group's return on equity of 8.62%.

Universal Insurance Holdings has a consensus price target of $27.00, signalling upside risk potential of 23.85%. On the other hand Safety Insurance Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -10.42%. Given that Universal Insurance Holdings has higher upside potential than Safety Insurance Group, analysts believe Universal Insurance Holdings is more attractive than Safety Insurance Group.

Universal Insurance Holdings has a beta of 0.844, which suggesting that the stock is 15.601% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Safety Insurance Group has a beta of 0.130, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 87.01%.

Universal Insurance Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.94%. Safety Insurance Group offers a yield of 4.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.90 per share. Universal Insurance Holdings pays 37.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Safety Insurance Group pays out 75.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Universal Insurance Holdings quarterly revenues are $384.8M, which are larger than Safety Insurance Group quarterly revenues of $284.7M. Universal Insurance Holdings's net income of $6M is lower than Safety Insurance Group's net income of $8.1M. Notably, Universal Insurance Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.95x while Safety Insurance Group's PE ratio is 16.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Universal Insurance Holdings is 0.42x versus 1.04x for Safety Insurance Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Selective Insurance Group has a net margin of 1.56% compared to Universal Insurance Holdings's net margin of 7.6%. Universal Insurance Holdings's return on equity of 15.73% beat Selective Insurance Group's return on equity of 6.82%.

Universal Insurance Holdings has a consensus price target of $27.00, signalling upside risk potential of 23.85%. On the other hand Selective Insurance Group has an analysts' consensus of $94.57 which suggests that it could grow by 7.7%. Given that Universal Insurance Holdings has higher upside potential than Selective Insurance Group, analysts believe Universal Insurance Holdings is more attractive than Selective Insurance Group.

Universal Insurance Holdings has a beta of 0.844, which suggesting that the stock is 15.601% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Selective Insurance Group has a beta of 0.543, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.745%.

Universal Insurance Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.94%. Selective Insurance Group offers a yield of 1.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. Universal Insurance Holdings pays 37.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Selective Insurance Group pays out 45.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Universal Insurance Holdings quarterly revenues are $384.8M, which are smaller than Selective Insurance Group quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Universal Insurance Holdings's net income of $6M is lower than Selective Insurance Group's net income of $95.5M. Notably, Universal Insurance Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.95x while Selective Insurance Group's PE ratio is 27.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Universal Insurance Holdings is 0.42x versus 1.11x for Selective Insurance Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

United Fire Group has a net margin of 1.56% compared to Universal Insurance Holdings's net margin of 9.48%. Universal Insurance Holdings's return on equity of 15.73% beat United Fire Group's return on equity of 8.23%.

Universal Insurance Holdings has a consensus price target of $27.00, signalling upside risk potential of 23.85%. On the other hand United Fire Group has an analysts' consensus of $30.00 which suggests that it could grow by 2.74%. Given that Universal Insurance Holdings has higher upside potential than United Fire Group, analysts believe Universal Insurance Holdings is more attractive than United Fire Group.

Universal Insurance Holdings has a beta of 0.844, which suggesting that the stock is 15.601% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison United Fire Group has a beta of 0.454, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.625%.

Universal Insurance Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.94%. United Fire Group offers a yield of 2.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Universal Insurance Holdings pays 37.89% of its earnings as a dividend. United Fire Group pays out 26.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Universal Insurance Holdings quarterly revenues are $384.8M, which are larger than United Fire Group quarterly revenues of $331.7M. Universal Insurance Holdings's net income of $6M is lower than United Fire Group's net income of $31.4M. Notably, Universal Insurance Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.95x while United Fire Group's PE ratio is 12.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Universal Insurance Holdings is 0.42x versus 0.60x for United Fire Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.