CINF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

American International Group has a net margin of 15.96% compared to Cincinnati Financial's net margin of 12.55%. Cincinnati Financial's return on equity of 17.56% beat American International Group's return on equity of -3.02%.

Cincinnati Financial has a consensus price target of $155.33, signalling upside risk potential of 6.23%. On the other hand American International Group has an analysts' consensus of $84.62 which suggests that it could grow by 1.09%. Given that Cincinnati Financial has higher upside potential than American International Group, analysts believe Cincinnati Financial is more attractive than American International Group.

Cincinnati Financial has a beta of 0.659, which suggesting that the stock is 34.119% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison American International Group has a beta of 0.984, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.619%.

Cincinnati Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.81 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.22%. American International Group offers a yield of 1.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Cincinnati Financial pays 21.38% of its earnings as a dividend. American International Group pays out -72.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Cincinnati Financial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cincinnati Financial quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are smaller than American International Group quarterly revenues of $7.2B. Cincinnati Financial's net income of $405M is lower than American International Group's net income of $898M. Notably, Cincinnati Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.07x while American International Group's PE ratio is 11.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cincinnati Financial is 2.04x versus 1.66x for American International Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Allstate has a net margin of 15.96% compared to Cincinnati Financial's net margin of 11.68%. Cincinnati Financial's return on equity of 17.56% beat Allstate's return on equity of 24.09%.

Cincinnati Financial has a consensus price target of $155.33, signalling upside risk potential of 6.23%. On the other hand Allstate has an analysts' consensus of $225.06 which suggests that it could grow by 7.08%. Given that Allstate has higher upside potential than Cincinnati Financial, analysts believe Allstate is more attractive than Cincinnati Financial.

Cincinnati Financial has a beta of 0.659, which suggesting that the stock is 34.119% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Allstate has a beta of 0.472, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.839%.

Cincinnati Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.81 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.22%. Allstate offers a yield of 1.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. Cincinnati Financial pays 21.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Allstate pays out 23.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cincinnati Financial quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are smaller than Allstate quarterly revenues of $16.5B. Cincinnati Financial's net income of $405M is lower than Allstate's net income of $1.9B. Notably, Cincinnati Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.07x while Allstate's PE ratio is 12.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cincinnati Financial is 2.04x versus 0.88x for Allstate. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Radian Group has a net margin of 15.96% compared to Cincinnati Financial's net margin of 46.88%. Cincinnati Financial's return on equity of 17.56% beat Radian Group's return on equity of 13.35%.

Cincinnati Financial has a consensus price target of $155.33, signalling upside risk potential of 6.23%. On the other hand Radian Group has an analysts' consensus of $36.43 which suggests that it could grow by 13.88%. Given that Radian Group has higher upside potential than Cincinnati Financial, analysts believe Radian Group is more attractive than Cincinnati Financial.

Cincinnati Financial has a beta of 0.659, which suggesting that the stock is 34.119% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Radian Group has a beta of 1.041, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.11%.

Cincinnati Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.81 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.22%. Radian Group offers a yield of 3.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. Cincinnati Financial pays 21.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Radian Group pays out 25.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cincinnati Financial quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than Radian Group quarterly revenues of $316.3M. Cincinnati Financial's net income of $405M is higher than Radian Group's net income of $148.3M. Notably, Cincinnati Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.07x while Radian Group's PE ratio is 8.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cincinnati Financial is 2.04x versus 3.82x for Radian Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Travelers Companies has a net margin of 15.96% compared to Cincinnati Financial's net margin of 17.33%. Cincinnati Financial's return on equity of 17.56% beat The Travelers Companies's return on equity of 19.17%.

Cincinnati Financial has a consensus price target of $155.33, signalling upside risk potential of 6.23%. On the other hand The Travelers Companies has an analysts' consensus of $269.15 which suggests that it could grow by 3%. Given that Cincinnati Financial has higher upside potential than The Travelers Companies, analysts believe Cincinnati Financial is more attractive than The Travelers Companies.

Cincinnati Financial has a beta of 0.659, which suggesting that the stock is 34.119% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Travelers Companies has a beta of 0.606, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.388%.

Cincinnati Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.81 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.22%. The Travelers Companies offers a yield of 1.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.05 per share. Cincinnati Financial pays 21.38% of its earnings as a dividend. The Travelers Companies pays out 19.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cincinnati Financial quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are smaller than The Travelers Companies quarterly revenues of $12B. Cincinnati Financial's net income of $405M is lower than The Travelers Companies's net income of $2.1B. Notably, Cincinnati Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.07x while The Travelers Companies's PE ratio is 12.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cincinnati Financial is 2.04x versus 1.30x for The Travelers Companies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.