RDN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

American International Group has a net margin of 46.88% compared to Radian Group's net margin of 12.55%. Radian Group's return on equity of 13.35% beat American International Group's return on equity of -3.02%.

Radian Group has a consensus price target of $36.43, signalling upside risk potential of 14.95%. On the other hand American International Group has an analysts' consensus of $84.62 which suggests that it could grow by 1.09%. Given that Radian Group has higher upside potential than American International Group, analysts believe Radian Group is more attractive than American International Group.

Radian Group has a beta of 1.041, which suggesting that the stock is 4.11% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison American International Group has a beta of 0.984, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.619%.

Radian Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.12%. American International Group offers a yield of 1.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Radian Group pays 25.14% of its earnings as a dividend. American International Group pays out -72.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Radian Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Radian Group quarterly revenues are $316.3M, which are smaller than American International Group quarterly revenues of $7.2B. Radian Group's net income of $148.3M is lower than American International Group's net income of $898M. Notably, Radian Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.06x while American International Group's PE ratio is 11.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Radian Group is 3.78x versus 1.66x for American International Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cincinnati Financial has a net margin of 46.88% compared to Radian Group's net margin of 15.96%. Radian Group's return on equity of 13.35% beat Cincinnati Financial's return on equity of 17.56%.

Radian Group has a consensus price target of $36.43, signalling upside risk potential of 14.95%. On the other hand Cincinnati Financial has an analysts' consensus of $155.33 which suggests that it could grow by 5.18%. Given that Radian Group has higher upside potential than Cincinnati Financial, analysts believe Radian Group is more attractive than Cincinnati Financial.

Radian Group has a beta of 1.041, which suggesting that the stock is 4.11% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cincinnati Financial has a beta of 0.659, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.119%.

Radian Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.12%. Cincinnati Financial offers a yield of 2.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.81 per share. Radian Group pays 25.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Cincinnati Financial pays out 21.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Radian Group quarterly revenues are $316.3M, which are smaller than Cincinnati Financial quarterly revenues of $2.5B. Radian Group's net income of $148.3M is lower than Cincinnati Financial's net income of $405M. Notably, Radian Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.06x while Cincinnati Financial's PE ratio is 10.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Radian Group is 3.78x versus 2.06x for Cincinnati Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Hartford Financial Services Group has a net margin of 46.88% compared to Radian Group's net margin of 12.54%. Radian Group's return on equity of 13.35% beat The Hartford Financial Services Group's return on equity of 19.46%.

Radian Group has a consensus price target of $36.43, signalling upside risk potential of 14.95%. On the other hand The Hartford Financial Services Group has an analysts' consensus of $128.71 which suggests that it could grow by 7.55%. Given that Radian Group has higher upside potential than The Hartford Financial Services Group, analysts believe Radian Group is more attractive than The Hartford Financial Services Group.

Radian Group has a beta of 1.041, which suggesting that the stock is 4.11% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Hartford Financial Services Group has a beta of 0.914, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.604%.

Radian Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.12%. The Hartford Financial Services Group offers a yield of 1.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share. Radian Group pays 25.14% of its earnings as a dividend. The Hartford Financial Services Group pays out 18.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Radian Group quarterly revenues are $316.3M, which are smaller than The Hartford Financial Services Group quarterly revenues of $6.8B. Radian Group's net income of $148.3M is lower than The Hartford Financial Services Group's net income of $853M. Notably, Radian Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.06x while The Hartford Financial Services Group's PE ratio is 11.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Radian Group is 3.78x versus 1.35x for The Hartford Financial Services Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MGIC Investment has a net margin of 46.88% compared to Radian Group's net margin of 61.27%. Radian Group's return on equity of 13.35% beat MGIC Investment's return on equity of 14.81%.

Radian Group has a consensus price target of $36.43, signalling upside risk potential of 14.95%. On the other hand MGIC Investment has an analysts' consensus of $27.14 which suggests that it could grow by 15.95%. Given that MGIC Investment has higher upside potential than Radian Group, analysts believe MGIC Investment is more attractive than Radian Group.

Radian Group has a beta of 1.041, which suggesting that the stock is 4.11% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MGIC Investment has a beta of 1.284, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.39%.

Radian Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.12%. MGIC Investment offers a yield of 2.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Radian Group pays 25.14% of its earnings as a dividend. MGIC Investment pays out 17.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Radian Group quarterly revenues are $316.3M, which are larger than MGIC Investment quarterly revenues of $301.4M. Radian Group's net income of $148.3M is lower than MGIC Investment's net income of $184.7M. Notably, Radian Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.06x while MGIC Investment's PE ratio is 8.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Radian Group is 3.78x versus 5.12x for MGIC Investment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.