TRV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Allstate has a net margin of 3.35% compared to The Travelers Companies's net margin of 11.68%. The Travelers Companies's return on equity of 15.98% beat Allstate's return on equity of 24.09%.

The Travelers Companies has a consensus price target of $276.41, signalling upside risk potential of 6.15%. On the other hand Allstate has an analysts' consensus of $224.29 which suggests that it could grow by 16.27%. Given that Allstate has higher upside potential than The Travelers Companies, analysts believe Allstate is more attractive than The Travelers Companies.

The Travelers Companies has a beta of 0.482, which suggesting that the stock is 51.825% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Allstate has a beta of 0.362, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.838%.

The Travelers Companies has a quarterly dividend of $1.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.61%. Allstate offers a yield of 1.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. The Travelers Companies pays 19.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Allstate pays out 23.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The Travelers Companies quarterly revenues are $11.8B, which are smaller than Allstate quarterly revenues of $16.5B. The Travelers Companies's net income of $395M is lower than Allstate's net income of $1.9B. Notably, The Travelers Companies's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.18x while Allstate's PE ratio is 11.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Travelers Companies is 1.28x versus 0.81x for Allstate. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ally Financial has a net margin of 3.35% compared to The Travelers Companies's net margin of -12.63%. The Travelers Companies's return on equity of 15.98% beat Ally Financial's return on equity of 2.03%.

The Travelers Companies has a consensus price target of $276.41, signalling upside risk potential of 6.15%. On the other hand Ally Financial has an analysts' consensus of $41.72 which suggests that it could grow by 26.74%. Given that Ally Financial has higher upside potential than The Travelers Companies, analysts believe Ally Financial is more attractive than The Travelers Companies.

The Travelers Companies has a beta of 0.482, which suggesting that the stock is 51.825% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ally Financial has a beta of 1.120, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.971%.

The Travelers Companies has a quarterly dividend of $1.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.61%. Ally Financial offers a yield of 3.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. The Travelers Companies pays 19.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Ally Financial pays out 72.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The Travelers Companies quarterly revenues are $11.8B, which are larger than Ally Financial quarterly revenues of $1.8B. The Travelers Companies's net income of $395M is higher than Ally Financial's net income of -$225M. Notably, The Travelers Companies's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.18x while Ally Financial's PE ratio is 24.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Travelers Companies is 1.28x versus 1.20x for Ally Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Progressive has a net margin of 3.35% compared to The Travelers Companies's net margin of 12.58%. The Travelers Companies's return on equity of 15.98% beat Progressive's return on equity of 34.35%.

The Travelers Companies has a consensus price target of $276.41, signalling upside risk potential of 6.15%. On the other hand Progressive has an analysts' consensus of $291.9412 which suggests that it could grow by 10.09%. Given that Progressive has higher upside potential than The Travelers Companies, analysts believe Progressive is more attractive than The Travelers Companies.

The Travelers Companies has a beta of 0.482, which suggesting that the stock is 51.825% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Progressive has a beta of 0.380, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.975%.

The Travelers Companies has a quarterly dividend of $1.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.61%. Progressive offers a yield of 1.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. The Travelers Companies pays 19.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Progressive pays out 8.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The Travelers Companies quarterly revenues are $11.8B, which are smaller than Progressive quarterly revenues of $20.4B. The Travelers Companies's net income of $395M is lower than Progressive's net income of $2.6B. Notably, The Travelers Companies's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.18x while Progressive's PE ratio is 17.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Travelers Companies is 1.28x versus 1.98x for Progressive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WR Berkley has a net margin of 3.35% compared to The Travelers Companies's net margin of 11.84%. The Travelers Companies's return on equity of 15.98% beat WR Berkley's return on equity of 20.94%.

The Travelers Companies has a consensus price target of $276.41, signalling upside risk potential of 6.15%. On the other hand WR Berkley has an analysts' consensus of $67.43 which suggests that it could fall by -6.02%. Given that The Travelers Companies has higher upside potential than WR Berkley, analysts believe The Travelers Companies is more attractive than WR Berkley.

The Travelers Companies has a beta of 0.482, which suggesting that the stock is 51.825% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WR Berkley has a beta of 0.405, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.537%.

The Travelers Companies has a quarterly dividend of $1.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.61%. WR Berkley offers a yield of 0.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. The Travelers Companies pays 19.02% of its earnings as a dividend. WR Berkley pays out 30.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The Travelers Companies quarterly revenues are $11.8B, which are larger than WR Berkley quarterly revenues of $3.5B. The Travelers Companies's net income of $395M is lower than WR Berkley's net income of $417.6M. Notably, The Travelers Companies's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.18x while WR Berkley's PE ratio is 16.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Travelers Companies is 1.28x versus 2.07x for WR Berkley. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.