TRV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Allstate has a net margin of 17.33% compared to The Travelers Companies's net margin of 11.68%. The Travelers Companies's return on equity of 19.17% beat Allstate's return on equity of 24.09%.

The Travelers Companies has a consensus price target of $269.15, signalling upside risk potential of 5.16%. On the other hand Allstate has an analysts' consensus of $225.06 which suggests that it could grow by 8.47%. Given that Allstate has higher upside potential than The Travelers Companies, analysts believe Allstate is more attractive than The Travelers Companies.

The Travelers Companies has a beta of 0.606, which suggesting that the stock is 39.388% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Allstate has a beta of 0.472, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.839%.

The Travelers Companies has a quarterly dividend of $1.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.64%. Allstate offers a yield of 1.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. The Travelers Companies pays 19.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Allstate pays out 23.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The Travelers Companies quarterly revenues are $12B, which are smaller than Allstate quarterly revenues of $16.5B. The Travelers Companies's net income of $2.1B is higher than Allstate's net income of $1.9B. Notably, The Travelers Companies's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.92x while Allstate's PE ratio is 12.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Travelers Companies is 1.27x versus 0.87x for Allstate. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mercury General has a net margin of 17.33% compared to The Travelers Companies's net margin of 7.4%. The Travelers Companies's return on equity of 19.17% beat Mercury General's return on equity of 27.18%.

The Travelers Companies has a consensus price target of $269.15, signalling upside risk potential of 5.16%. On the other hand Mercury General has an analysts' consensus of $80.00 which suggests that it could grow by 44.2%. Given that Mercury General has higher upside potential than The Travelers Companies, analysts believe Mercury General is more attractive than The Travelers Companies.

The Travelers Companies has a beta of 0.606, which suggesting that the stock is 39.388% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mercury General has a beta of 0.804, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.595%.

The Travelers Companies has a quarterly dividend of $1.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.64%. Mercury General offers a yield of 2.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share. The Travelers Companies pays 19.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Mercury General pays out 15.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The Travelers Companies quarterly revenues are $12B, which are larger than Mercury General quarterly revenues of $1.4B. The Travelers Companies's net income of $2.1B is higher than Mercury General's net income of $101.1M. Notably, The Travelers Companies's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.92x while Mercury General's PE ratio is 6.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Travelers Companies is 1.27x versus 0.56x for Mercury General. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Progressive has a net margin of 17.33% compared to The Travelers Companies's net margin of 11.63%. The Travelers Companies's return on equity of 19.17% beat Progressive's return on equity of 35.88%.

The Travelers Companies has a consensus price target of $269.15, signalling upside risk potential of 5.16%. On the other hand Progressive has an analysts' consensus of $287.0588 which suggests that it could grow by 2.74%. Given that The Travelers Companies has higher upside potential than Progressive, analysts believe The Travelers Companies is more attractive than Progressive.

The Travelers Companies has a beta of 0.606, which suggesting that the stock is 39.388% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Progressive has a beta of 0.350, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 64.961%.

The Travelers Companies has a quarterly dividend of $1.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.64%. Progressive offers a yield of 1.75% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $4.60 per share. The Travelers Companies pays 19.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Progressive pays out 8.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The Travelers Companies quarterly revenues are $12B, which are smaller than Progressive quarterly revenues of $20.3B. The Travelers Companies's net income of $2.1B is lower than Progressive's net income of $2.4B. Notably, The Travelers Companies's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.92x while Progressive's PE ratio is 19.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Travelers Companies is 1.27x versus 2.18x for Progressive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WR Berkley has a net margin of 17.33% compared to The Travelers Companies's net margin of 15.48%. The Travelers Companies's return on equity of 19.17% beat WR Berkley's return on equity of 22.01%.

The Travelers Companies has a consensus price target of $269.15, signalling upside risk potential of 5.16%. On the other hand WR Berkley has an analysts' consensus of $63.88 which suggests that it could grow by 3.25%. Given that The Travelers Companies has higher upside potential than WR Berkley, analysts believe The Travelers Companies is more attractive than WR Berkley.

The Travelers Companies has a beta of 0.606, which suggesting that the stock is 39.388% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WR Berkley has a beta of 0.634, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.554%.

The Travelers Companies has a quarterly dividend of $1.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.64%. WR Berkley offers a yield of 0.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. The Travelers Companies pays 19.02% of its earnings as a dividend. WR Berkley pays out 30.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The Travelers Companies quarterly revenues are $12B, which are larger than WR Berkley quarterly revenues of $3.7B. The Travelers Companies's net income of $2.1B is higher than WR Berkley's net income of $576.1M. Notably, The Travelers Companies's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.92x while WR Berkley's PE ratio is 14.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Travelers Companies is 1.27x versus 1.82x for WR Berkley. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.