WRB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Allstate has a net margin of 15.48% compared to WR Berkley's net margin of 11.68%. WR Berkley's return on equity of 22.01% beat Allstate's return on equity of 24.09%.

WR Berkley has a consensus price target of $63.88, signalling upside risk potential of 3.25%. On the other hand Allstate has an analysts' consensus of $225.06 which suggests that it could grow by 8.47%. Given that Allstate has higher upside potential than WR Berkley, analysts believe Allstate is more attractive than WR Berkley.

WR Berkley has a beta of 0.634, which suggesting that the stock is 36.554% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Allstate has a beta of 0.472, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.839%.

WR Berkley has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.52%. Allstate offers a yield of 1.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. WR Berkley pays 30.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Allstate pays out 23.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

WR Berkley quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are smaller than Allstate quarterly revenues of $16.5B. WR Berkley's net income of $576.1M is lower than Allstate's net income of $1.9B. Notably, WR Berkley's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.18x while Allstate's PE ratio is 12.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WR Berkley is 1.82x versus 0.87x for Allstate. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CNA Financial has a net margin of 15.48% compared to WR Berkley's net margin of 0.58%. WR Berkley's return on equity of 22.01% beat CNA Financial's return on equity of 9.46%.

WR Berkley has a consensus price target of $63.88, signalling upside risk potential of 3.25%. On the other hand CNA Financial has an analysts' consensus of $48.00 which suggests that it could fall by -0.17%. Given that WR Berkley has higher upside potential than CNA Financial, analysts believe WR Berkley is more attractive than CNA Financial.

WR Berkley has a beta of 0.634, which suggesting that the stock is 36.554% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CNA Financial has a beta of 0.680, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.011%.

WR Berkley has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.52%. CNA Financial offers a yield of 3.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.46 per share. WR Berkley pays 30.29% of its earnings as a dividend. CNA Financial pays out 106.88% of its earnings as a dividend. WR Berkley's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but CNA Financial's is not.

WR Berkley quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are larger than CNA Financial quarterly revenues of $3.6B. WR Berkley's net income of $576.1M is higher than CNA Financial's net income of $21M. Notably, WR Berkley's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.18x while CNA Financial's PE ratio is 13.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WR Berkley is 1.82x versus 0.94x for CNA Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kinsale Capital Group has a net margin of 15.48% compared to WR Berkley's net margin of 26.47%. WR Berkley's return on equity of 22.01% beat Kinsale Capital Group's return on equity of 32.24%.

WR Berkley has a consensus price target of $63.88, signalling upside risk potential of 3.25%. On the other hand Kinsale Capital Group has an analysts' consensus of $474.11 which suggests that it could grow by 7.93%. Given that Kinsale Capital Group has higher upside potential than WR Berkley, analysts believe Kinsale Capital Group is more attractive than WR Berkley.

WR Berkley has a beta of 0.634, which suggesting that the stock is 36.554% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kinsale Capital Group has a beta of 1.249, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.891%.

WR Berkley has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.52%. Kinsale Capital Group offers a yield of 0.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. WR Berkley pays 30.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Kinsale Capital Group pays out 3.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

WR Berkley quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are larger than Kinsale Capital Group quarterly revenues of $412.1M. WR Berkley's net income of $576.1M is higher than Kinsale Capital Group's net income of $109.1M. Notably, WR Berkley's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.18x while Kinsale Capital Group's PE ratio is 24.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WR Berkley is 1.82x versus 6.46x for Kinsale Capital Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Travelers Companies has a net margin of 15.48% compared to WR Berkley's net margin of 17.33%. WR Berkley's return on equity of 22.01% beat The Travelers Companies's return on equity of 19.17%.

WR Berkley has a consensus price target of $63.88, signalling upside risk potential of 3.25%. On the other hand The Travelers Companies has an analysts' consensus of $269.15 which suggests that it could grow by 5.16%. Given that The Travelers Companies has higher upside potential than WR Berkley, analysts believe The Travelers Companies is more attractive than WR Berkley.

WR Berkley has a beta of 0.634, which suggesting that the stock is 36.554% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Travelers Companies has a beta of 0.606, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.388%.

WR Berkley has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.52%. The Travelers Companies offers a yield of 1.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.05 per share. WR Berkley pays 30.29% of its earnings as a dividend. The Travelers Companies pays out 19.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

WR Berkley quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are smaller than The Travelers Companies quarterly revenues of $12B. WR Berkley's net income of $576.1M is lower than The Travelers Companies's net income of $2.1B. Notably, WR Berkley's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.18x while The Travelers Companies's PE ratio is 11.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WR Berkley is 1.82x versus 1.27x for The Travelers Companies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.