WRB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Allstate has a net margin of 11.84% compared to WR Berkley's net margin of 11.68%. WR Berkley's return on equity of 20.94% beat Allstate's return on equity of 24.09%.

WR Berkley has a consensus price target of $67.43, signalling downside risk potential of -5.35%. On the other hand Allstate has an analysts' consensus of $224.29 which suggests that it could grow by 15.11%. Given that Allstate has higher upside potential than WR Berkley, analysts believe Allstate is more attractive than WR Berkley.

WR Berkley has a beta of 0.405, which suggesting that the stock is 59.537% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Allstate has a beta of 0.362, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.838%.

WR Berkley has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.45%. Allstate offers a yield of 1.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. WR Berkley pays 30.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Allstate pays out 23.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

WR Berkley quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are smaller than Allstate quarterly revenues of $16.5B. WR Berkley's net income of $417.6M is lower than Allstate's net income of $1.9B. Notably, WR Berkley's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.53x while Allstate's PE ratio is 11.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WR Berkley is 2.05x versus 0.81x for Allstate. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CNA Financial has a net margin of 11.84% compared to WR Berkley's net margin of 0.58%. WR Berkley's return on equity of 20.94% beat CNA Financial's return on equity of 9.46%.

WR Berkley has a consensus price target of $67.43, signalling downside risk potential of -5.35%. On the other hand CNA Financial has an analysts' consensus of $43.00 which suggests that it could fall by -10.44%. Given that CNA Financial has more downside risk than WR Berkley, analysts believe WR Berkley is more attractive than CNA Financial.

WR Berkley has a beta of 0.405, which suggesting that the stock is 59.537% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CNA Financial has a beta of 0.473, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.703%.

WR Berkley has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.45%. CNA Financial offers a yield of 3.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.46 per share. WR Berkley pays 30.29% of its earnings as a dividend. CNA Financial pays out 106.88% of its earnings as a dividend. WR Berkley's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but CNA Financial's is not.

WR Berkley quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are smaller than CNA Financial quarterly revenues of $3.6B. WR Berkley's net income of $417.6M is higher than CNA Financial's net income of $21M. Notably, WR Berkley's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.53x while CNA Financial's PE ratio is 13.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WR Berkley is 2.05x versus 0.94x for CNA Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RLI has a net margin of 11.84% compared to WR Berkley's net margin of 9.31%. WR Berkley's return on equity of 20.94% beat RLI's return on equity of 22.2%.

WR Berkley has a consensus price target of $67.43, signalling downside risk potential of -5.35%. On the other hand RLI has an analysts' consensus of $79.75 which suggests that it could grow by 2.15%. Given that RLI has higher upside potential than WR Berkley, analysts believe RLI is more attractive than WR Berkley.

WR Berkley has a beta of 0.405, which suggesting that the stock is 59.537% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RLI has a beta of 0.490, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.971%.

WR Berkley has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.45%. RLI offers a yield of 0.75% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. WR Berkley pays 30.29% of its earnings as a dividend. RLI pays out 68.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

WR Berkley quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are larger than RLI quarterly revenues of $439.1M. WR Berkley's net income of $417.6M is higher than RLI's net income of $40.9M. Notably, WR Berkley's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.53x while RLI's PE ratio is 20.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WR Berkley is 2.05x versus 4.08x for RLI. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Travelers Companies has a net margin of 11.84% compared to WR Berkley's net margin of 3.35%. WR Berkley's return on equity of 20.94% beat The Travelers Companies's return on equity of 15.98%.

WR Berkley has a consensus price target of $67.43, signalling downside risk potential of -5.35%. On the other hand The Travelers Companies has an analysts' consensus of $275.91 which suggests that it could grow by 6.5%. Given that The Travelers Companies has higher upside potential than WR Berkley, analysts believe The Travelers Companies is more attractive than WR Berkley.

WR Berkley has a beta of 0.405, which suggesting that the stock is 59.537% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Travelers Companies has a beta of 0.482, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.825%.

WR Berkley has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.45%. The Travelers Companies offers a yield of 1.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.05 per share. WR Berkley pays 30.29% of its earnings as a dividend. The Travelers Companies pays out 19.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

WR Berkley quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are smaller than The Travelers Companies quarterly revenues of $11.8B. WR Berkley's net income of $417.6M is higher than The Travelers Companies's net income of $395M. Notably, WR Berkley's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.53x while The Travelers Companies's PE ratio is 14.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WR Berkley is 2.05x versus 1.27x for The Travelers Companies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.