CNA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

American International Group has a net margin of 0.58% compared to CNA Financial's net margin of 12.55%. CNA Financial's return on equity of 9.46% beat American International Group's return on equity of -3.02%.

CNA Financial has a consensus price target of $48.00, signalling downside risk potential of -2.04%. On the other hand American International Group has an analysts' consensus of $84.62 which suggests that it could grow by 1.8%. Given that American International Group has higher upside potential than CNA Financial, analysts believe American International Group is more attractive than CNA Financial.

CNA Financial has a beta of 0.680, which suggesting that the stock is 32.011% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison American International Group has a beta of 0.984, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.619%.

CNA Financial has a quarterly dividend of $2.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.63%. American International Group offers a yield of 1.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. CNA Financial pays 106.88% of its earnings as a dividend. American International Group pays out -72.94% of its earnings as a dividend.

CNA Financial quarterly revenues are $3.6B, which are smaller than American International Group quarterly revenues of $7.2B. CNA Financial's net income of $21M is lower than American International Group's net income of $898M. Notably, CNA Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.92x while American International Group's PE ratio is 11.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CNA Financial is 0.95x versus 1.65x for American International Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cincinnati Financial has a net margin of 0.58% compared to CNA Financial's net margin of 15.96%. CNA Financial's return on equity of 9.46% beat Cincinnati Financial's return on equity of 17.56%.

CNA Financial has a consensus price target of $48.00, signalling downside risk potential of -2.04%. On the other hand Cincinnati Financial has an analysts' consensus of $155.33 which suggests that it could grow by 6.85%. Given that Cincinnati Financial has higher upside potential than CNA Financial, analysts believe Cincinnati Financial is more attractive than CNA Financial.

CNA Financial has a beta of 0.680, which suggesting that the stock is 32.011% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cincinnati Financial has a beta of 0.659, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.119%.

CNA Financial has a quarterly dividend of $2.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.63%. Cincinnati Financial offers a yield of 2.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.81 per share. CNA Financial pays 106.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Cincinnati Financial pays out 21.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Cincinnati Financial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but CNA Financial's is not.

CNA Financial quarterly revenues are $3.6B, which are larger than Cincinnati Financial quarterly revenues of $2.5B. CNA Financial's net income of $21M is lower than Cincinnati Financial's net income of $405M. Notably, CNA Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.92x while Cincinnati Financial's PE ratio is 10.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CNA Financial is 0.95x versus 2.02x for Cincinnati Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Loews has a net margin of 0.58% compared to CNA Financial's net margin of 4.18%. CNA Financial's return on equity of 9.46% beat Loews's return on equity of 8.14%.

CNA Financial has a consensus price target of $48.00, signalling downside risk potential of -2.04%. On the other hand Loews has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -62.97%. Given that Loews has more downside risk than CNA Financial, analysts believe CNA Financial is more attractive than Loews.

CNA Financial has a beta of 0.680, which suggesting that the stock is 32.011% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Loews has a beta of 0.796, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.449%.

CNA Financial has a quarterly dividend of $2.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.63%. Loews offers a yield of 0.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. CNA Financial pays 106.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Loews pays out 3.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Loews's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but CNA Financial's is not.

CNA Financial quarterly revenues are $3.6B, which are smaller than Loews quarterly revenues of $4.5B. CNA Financial's net income of $21M is lower than Loews's net income of $187M. Notably, CNA Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.92x while Loews's PE ratio is 13.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CNA Financial is 0.95x versus 1.11x for Loews. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WR Berkley has a net margin of 0.58% compared to CNA Financial's net margin of 15.48%. CNA Financial's return on equity of 9.46% beat WR Berkley's return on equity of 22.01%.

CNA Financial has a consensus price target of $48.00, signalling downside risk potential of -2.04%. On the other hand WR Berkley has an analysts' consensus of $63.88 which suggests that it could grow by 3.25%. Given that WR Berkley has higher upside potential than CNA Financial, analysts believe WR Berkley is more attractive than CNA Financial.

CNA Financial has a beta of 0.680, which suggesting that the stock is 32.011% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WR Berkley has a beta of 0.634, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.554%.

CNA Financial has a quarterly dividend of $2.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.63%. WR Berkley offers a yield of 0.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. CNA Financial pays 106.88% of its earnings as a dividend. WR Berkley pays out 30.29% of its earnings as a dividend. WR Berkley's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but CNA Financial's is not.

CNA Financial quarterly revenues are $3.6B, which are smaller than WR Berkley quarterly revenues of $3.7B. CNA Financial's net income of $21M is lower than WR Berkley's net income of $576.1M. Notably, CNA Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.92x while WR Berkley's PE ratio is 14.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CNA Financial is 0.95x versus 1.82x for WR Berkley. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.