PKG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hasbro has a net margin of 10.91% compared to Packaging Corp of America's net margin of 17.42%. Packaging Corp of America's return on equity of 19.04% beat Hasbro's return on equity of -46.99%.

Packaging Corp of America has a consensus price target of $236.32, signalling upside risk potential of 3.63%. On the other hand Hasbro has an analysts' consensus of $78.09 which suggests that it could grow by 36.9%. Given that Hasbro has higher upside potential than Packaging Corp of America, analysts believe Hasbro is more attractive than Packaging Corp of America.

Packaging Corp of America has a beta of 0.791, which suggesting that the stock is 20.926% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hasbro has a beta of 0.642, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.753%.

Packaging Corp of America has a quarterly dividend of $1.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.19%. Hasbro offers a yield of 4.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share. Packaging Corp of America pays 58.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Hasbro pays out -26.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Packaging Corp of America's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Packaging Corp of America quarterly revenues are $2.2B, which are larger than Hasbro quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Packaging Corp of America's net income of $238.1M is higher than Hasbro's net income of $223.2M. Notably, Packaging Corp of America's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.58x while Hasbro's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Packaging Corp of America is 2.50x versus 1.85x for Hasbro. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

International Paper has a net margin of 10.91% compared to Packaging Corp of America's net margin of 3.2%. Packaging Corp of America's return on equity of 19.04% beat International Paper's return on equity of 4.92%.

Packaging Corp of America has a consensus price target of $236.32, signalling upside risk potential of 3.63%. On the other hand International Paper has an analysts' consensus of $56.23 which suggests that it could grow by 3.96%. Given that International Paper has higher upside potential than Packaging Corp of America, analysts believe International Paper is more attractive than Packaging Corp of America.

Packaging Corp of America has a beta of 0.791, which suggesting that the stock is 20.926% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison International Paper has a beta of 1.033, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.296%.

Packaging Corp of America has a quarterly dividend of $1.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.19%. International Paper offers a yield of 3.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share. Packaging Corp of America pays 58.66% of its earnings as a dividend. International Paper pays out 222.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Packaging Corp of America's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but International Paper's is not.

Packaging Corp of America quarterly revenues are $2.2B, which are smaller than International Paper quarterly revenues of $4.7B. Packaging Corp of America's net income of $238.1M is higher than International Paper's net income of $150M. Notably, Packaging Corp of America's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.58x while International Paper's PE ratio is 46.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Packaging Corp of America is 2.50x versus 1.02x for International Paper. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mattel has a net margin of 10.91% compared to Packaging Corp of America's net margin of 20.2%. Packaging Corp of America's return on equity of 19.04% beat Mattel's return on equity of 26.12%.

Packaging Corp of America has a consensus price target of $236.32, signalling upside risk potential of 3.63%. On the other hand Mattel has an analysts' consensus of $24.08 which suggests that it could grow by 28.91%. Given that Mattel has higher upside potential than Packaging Corp of America, analysts believe Mattel is more attractive than Packaging Corp of America.

Packaging Corp of America has a beta of 0.791, which suggesting that the stock is 20.926% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mattel has a beta of 0.754, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.641%.

Packaging Corp of America has a quarterly dividend of $1.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.19%. Mattel offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Packaging Corp of America pays 58.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Mattel pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Packaging Corp of America's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Packaging Corp of America quarterly revenues are $2.2B, which are larger than Mattel quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Packaging Corp of America's net income of $238.1M is lower than Mattel's net income of $372.4M. Notably, Packaging Corp of America's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.58x while Mattel's PE ratio is 11.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Packaging Corp of America is 2.50x versus 1.21x for Mattel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla has a net margin of 10.91% compared to Packaging Corp of America's net margin of 8.61%. Packaging Corp of America's return on equity of 19.04% beat Tesla's return on equity of 19.77%.

Packaging Corp of America has a consensus price target of $236.32, signalling upside risk potential of 3.63%. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $296.71 which suggests that it could fall by -24.83%. Given that Packaging Corp of America has higher upside potential than Tesla, analysts believe Packaging Corp of America is more attractive than Tesla.

Packaging Corp of America has a beta of 0.791, which suggesting that the stock is 20.926% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.301, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 130.123%.

Packaging Corp of America has a quarterly dividend of $1.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.19%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Packaging Corp of America pays 58.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Packaging Corp of America's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Packaging Corp of America quarterly revenues are $2.2B, which are smaller than Tesla quarterly revenues of $25.2B. Packaging Corp of America's net income of $238.1M is lower than Tesla's net income of $2.2B. Notably, Packaging Corp of America's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.58x while Tesla's PE ratio is 108.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Packaging Corp of America is 2.50x versus 14.18x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.