BERY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Crown Holdings has a net margin of 4.67% compared to Berry Global Group's net margin of -5.69%. Berry Global Group's return on equity of 15.34% beat Crown Holdings's return on equity of 3.35%.

Berry Global Group has a consensus price target of $74.07, signalling upside risk potential of 13.33%. On the other hand Crown Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $108.20 which suggests that it could grow by 37.36%. Given that Crown Holdings has higher upside potential than Berry Global Group, analysts believe Crown Holdings is more attractive than Berry Global Group.

Berry Global Group has a beta of 1.132, which suggesting that the stock is 13.232% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Crown Holdings has a beta of 0.860, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.033%.

Berry Global Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.74%. Crown Holdings offers a yield of 1.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Berry Global Group pays 26.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Crown Holdings pays out 25.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Berry Global Group quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are larger than Crown Holdings quarterly revenues of $3.1B. Berry Global Group's net income of $148M is higher than Crown Holdings's net income of -$175M. Notably, Berry Global Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.89x while Crown Holdings's PE ratio is 97.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Berry Global Group is 0.63x versus 0.80x for Crown Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hyliion Holdings has a net margin of 4.67% compared to Berry Global Group's net margin of --. Berry Global Group's return on equity of 15.34% beat Hyliion Holdings's return on equity of --.

Berry Global Group has a consensus price target of $74.07, signalling upside risk potential of 13.33%. On the other hand Hyliion Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -10.31%. Given that Berry Global Group has higher upside potential than Hyliion Holdings, analysts believe Berry Global Group is more attractive than Hyliion Holdings.

Berry Global Group has a beta of 1.132, which suggesting that the stock is 13.232% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyliion Holdings has a beta of 2.097, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 109.703%.

Berry Global Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.74%. Hyliion Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Berry Global Group pays 26.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Hyliion Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Berry Global Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Berry Global Group quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are larger than Hyliion Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Berry Global Group's net income of $148M is higher than Hyliion Holdings's net income of -$11.2M. Notably, Berry Global Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.89x while Hyliion Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Berry Global Group is 0.63x versus 223.64x for Hyliion Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Silgan Holdings has a net margin of 4.67% compared to Berry Global Group's net margin of 5.73%. Berry Global Group's return on equity of 15.34% beat Silgan Holdings's return on equity of 15.47%.

Berry Global Group has a consensus price target of $74.07, signalling upside risk potential of 13.33%. On the other hand Silgan Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $60.00 which suggests that it could grow by 18.77%. Given that Silgan Holdings has higher upside potential than Berry Global Group, analysts believe Silgan Holdings is more attractive than Berry Global Group.

Berry Global Group has a beta of 1.132, which suggesting that the stock is 13.232% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Silgan Holdings has a beta of 0.713, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.747%.

Berry Global Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.74%. Silgan Holdings offers a yield of 1.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. Berry Global Group pays 26.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Silgan Holdings pays out 24.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Berry Global Group quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are larger than Silgan Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Berry Global Group's net income of $148M is higher than Silgan Holdings's net income of $100.1M. Notably, Berry Global Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.89x while Silgan Holdings's PE ratio is 18.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Berry Global Group is 0.63x versus 0.93x for Silgan Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla has a net margin of 4.67% compared to Berry Global Group's net margin of 8.61%. Berry Global Group's return on equity of 15.34% beat Tesla's return on equity of 19.77%.

Berry Global Group has a consensus price target of $74.07, signalling upside risk potential of 13.33%. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $296.71 which suggests that it could fall by -24.83%. Given that Berry Global Group has higher upside potential than Tesla, analysts believe Berry Global Group is more attractive than Tesla.

Berry Global Group has a beta of 1.132, which suggesting that the stock is 13.232% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.301, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 130.123%.

Berry Global Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.74%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Berry Global Group pays 26.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Berry Global Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Berry Global Group quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are smaller than Tesla quarterly revenues of $25.2B. Berry Global Group's net income of $148M is lower than Tesla's net income of $2.2B. Notably, Berry Global Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.89x while Tesla's PE ratio is 108.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Berry Global Group is 0.63x versus 14.18x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.