BERY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Crown Holdings has a net margin of 0.59% compared to Berry Global Group's net margin of 12.33%. Berry Global Group's return on equity of 14.9% beat Crown Holdings's return on equity of 14.09%.

Berry Global Group has a consensus price target of $74.89, signalling upside risk potential of 7.8%. On the other hand Crown Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $108.70 which suggests that it could grow by 23.24%. Given that Crown Holdings has higher upside potential than Berry Global Group, analysts believe Crown Holdings is more attractive than Berry Global Group.

Berry Global Group has a beta of 1.131, which suggesting that the stock is 13.101% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Crown Holdings has a beta of 0.877, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.326%.

Berry Global Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.62%. Crown Holdings offers a yield of 1.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. Berry Global Group pays 26.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Crown Holdings pays out 28.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Berry Global Group quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are smaller than Crown Holdings quarterly revenues of $2.9B. Berry Global Group's net income of $14M is lower than Crown Holdings's net income of $358M. Notably, Berry Global Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.32x while Crown Holdings's PE ratio is 24.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Berry Global Group is 0.69x versus 0.89x for Crown Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hyliion Holdings has a net margin of 0.59% compared to Berry Global Group's net margin of --. Berry Global Group's return on equity of 14.9% beat Hyliion Holdings's return on equity of --.

Berry Global Group has a consensus price target of $74.89, signalling upside risk potential of 7.8%. On the other hand Hyliion Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 41.84%. Given that Hyliion Holdings has higher upside potential than Berry Global Group, analysts believe Hyliion Holdings is more attractive than Berry Global Group.

Berry Global Group has a beta of 1.131, which suggesting that the stock is 13.101% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyliion Holdings has a beta of 2.236, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 123.597%.

Berry Global Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.62%. Hyliion Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Berry Global Group pays 26.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Hyliion Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Berry Global Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Berry Global Group quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are larger than Hyliion Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Berry Global Group's net income of $14M is higher than Hyliion Holdings's net income of -$11.2M. Notably, Berry Global Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.32x while Hyliion Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Berry Global Group is 0.69x versus 127.45x for Hyliion Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Silgan Holdings has a net margin of 0.59% compared to Berry Global Group's net margin of 3.19%. Berry Global Group's return on equity of 14.9% beat Silgan Holdings's return on equity of 14.15%.

Berry Global Group has a consensus price target of $74.89, signalling upside risk potential of 7.8%. On the other hand Silgan Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $62.20 which suggests that it could grow by 22.66%. Given that Silgan Holdings has higher upside potential than Berry Global Group, analysts believe Silgan Holdings is more attractive than Berry Global Group.

Berry Global Group has a beta of 1.131, which suggesting that the stock is 13.101% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Silgan Holdings has a beta of 0.705, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.482%.

Berry Global Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.62%. Silgan Holdings offers a yield of 1.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Berry Global Group pays 26.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Silgan Holdings pays out 29.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Berry Global Group quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are larger than Silgan Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Berry Global Group's net income of $14M is lower than Silgan Holdings's net income of $45.1M. Notably, Berry Global Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.32x while Silgan Holdings's PE ratio is 19.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Berry Global Group is 0.69x versus 0.93x for Silgan Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla has a net margin of 0.59% compared to Berry Global Group's net margin of 9.17%. Berry Global Group's return on equity of 14.9% beat Tesla's return on equity of 10.47%.

Berry Global Group has a consensus price target of $74.89, signalling upside risk potential of 7.8%. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $330.38 which suggests that it could grow by 25.36%. Given that Tesla has higher upside potential than Berry Global Group, analysts believe Tesla is more attractive than Berry Global Group.

Berry Global Group has a beta of 1.131, which suggesting that the stock is 13.101% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.504, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 150.394%.

Berry Global Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.62%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Berry Global Group pays 26.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Berry Global Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Berry Global Group quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are smaller than Tesla quarterly revenues of $25.7B. Berry Global Group's net income of $14M is lower than Tesla's net income of $2.4B. Notably, Berry Global Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.32x while Tesla's PE ratio is 129.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Berry Global Group is 0.69x versus 9.43x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.