CCK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Columbia Sportswear has a net margin of 12.33% compared to Crown Holdings's net margin of 9.35%. Crown Holdings's return on equity of 14.09% beat Columbia Sportswear's return on equity of 12.08%.

Crown Holdings has a consensus price target of $108.70, signalling upside risk potential of 24.72%. On the other hand Columbia Sportswear has an analysts' consensus of $81.14 which suggests that it could grow by 6.52%. Given that Crown Holdings has higher upside potential than Columbia Sportswear, analysts believe Crown Holdings is more attractive than Columbia Sportswear.

Crown Holdings has a beta of 0.877, which suggesting that the stock is 12.326% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Columbia Sportswear has a beta of 0.899, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.058%.

Crown Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.16%. Columbia Sportswear offers a yield of 1.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Crown Holdings pays 28.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Columbia Sportswear pays out 31.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Crown Holdings quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are larger than Columbia Sportswear quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Crown Holdings's net income of $358M is higher than Columbia Sportswear's net income of $102.6M. Notably, Crown Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.48x while Columbia Sportswear's PE ratio is 19.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Crown Holdings is 0.88x versus 1.32x for Columbia Sportswear. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

International Paper has a net margin of 12.33% compared to Crown Holdings's net margin of -3.21%. Crown Holdings's return on equity of 14.09% beat International Paper's return on equity of 6.63%.

Crown Holdings has a consensus price target of $108.70, signalling upside risk potential of 24.72%. On the other hand International Paper has an analysts' consensus of $57.87 which suggests that it could grow by 2.86%. Given that Crown Holdings has higher upside potential than International Paper, analysts believe Crown Holdings is more attractive than International Paper.

Crown Holdings has a beta of 0.877, which suggesting that the stock is 12.326% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison International Paper has a beta of 1.022, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.225%.

Crown Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.16%. International Paper offers a yield of 3.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share. Crown Holdings pays 28.07% of its earnings as a dividend. International Paper pays out 115.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Crown Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but International Paper's is not.

Crown Holdings quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are smaller than International Paper quarterly revenues of $4.6B. Crown Holdings's net income of $358M is higher than International Paper's net income of -$147M. Notably, Crown Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.48x while International Paper's PE ratio is 35.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Crown Holdings is 0.88x versus 1.07x for International Paper. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Packaging Corp of America has a net margin of 12.33% compared to Crown Holdings's net margin of 10.3%. Crown Holdings's return on equity of 14.09% beat Packaging Corp of America's return on equity of 19.33%.

Crown Holdings has a consensus price target of $108.70, signalling upside risk potential of 24.72%. On the other hand Packaging Corp of America has an analysts' consensus of $228.70 which suggests that it could grow by 15.06%. Given that Crown Holdings has higher upside potential than Packaging Corp of America, analysts believe Crown Holdings is more attractive than Packaging Corp of America.

Crown Holdings has a beta of 0.877, which suggesting that the stock is 12.326% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Packaging Corp of America has a beta of 0.771, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.915%.

Crown Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.16%. Packaging Corp of America offers a yield of 2.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.25 per share. Crown Holdings pays 28.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Packaging Corp of America pays out 55.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Crown Holdings quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are larger than Packaging Corp of America quarterly revenues of $2.1B. Crown Holdings's net income of $358M is higher than Packaging Corp of America's net income of $221.1M. Notably, Crown Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.48x while Packaging Corp of America's PE ratio is 22.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Crown Holdings is 0.88x versus 2.12x for Packaging Corp of America. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PVH has a net margin of 12.33% compared to Crown Holdings's net margin of 5.85%. Crown Holdings's return on equity of 14.09% beat PVH's return on equity of 13.87%.

Crown Holdings has a consensus price target of $108.70, signalling upside risk potential of 24.72%. On the other hand PVH has an analysts' consensus of $112.07 which suggests that it could grow by 67.82%. Given that PVH has higher upside potential than Crown Holdings, analysts believe PVH is more attractive than Crown Holdings.

Crown Holdings has a beta of 0.877, which suggesting that the stock is 12.326% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PVH has a beta of 2.103, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 110.332%.

Crown Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.16%. PVH offers a yield of 0.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Crown Holdings pays 28.07% of its earnings as a dividend. PVH pays out 1.42% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Crown Holdings quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are larger than PVH quarterly revenues of $2.3B. Crown Holdings's net income of $358M is higher than PVH's net income of $131.9M. Notably, Crown Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.48x while PVH's PE ratio is 5.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Crown Holdings is 0.88x versus 0.44x for PVH. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.