MKFG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

ePlus has a net margin of -114.09% compared to Markforged Holding's net margin of 6.08%. Markforged Holding's return on equity of -65.07% beat ePlus's return on equity of 12.01%.

Markforged Holding has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 65.02%. On the other hand ePlus has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 21.19%. Given that Markforged Holding has higher upside potential than ePlus, analysts believe Markforged Holding is more attractive than ePlus.

Markforged Holding has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ePlus has a beta of 1.079, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.876%.

Markforged Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ePlus offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Markforged Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ePlus pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Markforged Holding quarterly revenues are $20.5M, which are smaller than ePlus quarterly revenues of $515.2M. Markforged Holding's net income of -$23.4M is lower than ePlus's net income of $31.3M. Notably, Markforged Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ePlus's PE ratio is 18.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Markforged Holding is 0.70x versus 0.93x for ePlus. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Red Violet has a net margin of -114.09% compared to Markforged Holding's net margin of 9.02%. Markforged Holding's return on equity of -65.07% beat Red Violet's return on equity of 5.77%.

Markforged Holding has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 65.02%. On the other hand Red Violet has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 14%. Given that Markforged Holding has higher upside potential than Red Violet, analysts believe Markforged Holding is more attractive than Red Violet.

Markforged Holding has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Red Violet has a beta of 1.490, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.029%.

Markforged Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Red Violet offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Markforged Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Red Violet pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Markforged Holding quarterly revenues are $20.5M, which are larger than Red Violet quarterly revenues of $19.1M. Markforged Holding's net income of -$23.4M is lower than Red Violet's net income of $1.7M. Notably, Markforged Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Red Violet's PE ratio is 104.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Markforged Holding is 0.70x versus 7.54x for Red Violet. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tenable Holdings has a net margin of -114.09% compared to Markforged Holding's net margin of -4.06%. Markforged Holding's return on equity of -65.07% beat Tenable Holdings's return on equity of -16.46%.

Markforged Holding has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 65.02%. On the other hand Tenable Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $48.51 which suggests that it could grow by 18.18%. Given that Markforged Holding has higher upside potential than Tenable Holdings, analysts believe Markforged Holding is more attractive than Tenable Holdings.

Markforged Holding has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tenable Holdings has a beta of 0.827, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.284%.

Markforged Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tenable Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Markforged Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tenable Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Markforged Holding quarterly revenues are $20.5M, which are smaller than Tenable Holdings quarterly revenues of $227.1M. Markforged Holding's net income of -$23.4M is lower than Tenable Holdings's net income of -$9.2M. Notably, Markforged Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Tenable Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Markforged Holding is 0.70x versus 5.52x for Tenable Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Upland Software has a net margin of -114.09% compared to Markforged Holding's net margin of -2.6%. Markforged Holding's return on equity of -65.07% beat Upland Software's return on equity of -69.75%.

Markforged Holding has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 65.02%. On the other hand Upland Software has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -28.79%. Given that Markforged Holding has higher upside potential than Upland Software, analysts believe Markforged Holding is more attractive than Upland Software.

Markforged Holding has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Upland Software has a beta of 1.324, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.379%.

Markforged Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Upland Software offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Markforged Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Upland Software pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Markforged Holding quarterly revenues are $20.5M, which are smaller than Upland Software quarterly revenues of $66.7M. Markforged Holding's net income of -$23.4M is lower than Upland Software's net income of -$1.7M. Notably, Markforged Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Upland Software's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Markforged Holding is 0.70x versus 0.44x for Upland Software. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.