TENB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

PagerDuty has a net margin of 0.79% compared to Tenable Holdings's net margin of -7.21%. Tenable Holdings's return on equity of -9.69% beat PagerDuty's return on equity of -25.94%.

Tenable Holdings has a consensus price target of $48.15, signalling upside risk potential of 36.91%. On the other hand PagerDuty has an analysts' consensus of $20.73 which suggests that it could grow by 12.77%. Given that Tenable Holdings has higher upside potential than PagerDuty, analysts believe Tenable Holdings is more attractive than PagerDuty.

Tenable Holdings has a beta of 0.885, which suggesting that the stock is 11.462% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PagerDuty has a beta of 1.058, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.806%.

Tenable Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. PagerDuty offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tenable Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PagerDuty pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Tenable Holdings quarterly revenues are $235.7M, which are larger than PagerDuty quarterly revenues of $121.4M. Tenable Holdings's net income of $1.9M is higher than PagerDuty's net income of -$8.8M. Notably, Tenable Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while PagerDuty's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tenable Holdings is 4.64x versus 3.62x for PagerDuty. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ePlus has a net margin of 0.79% compared to Tenable Holdings's net margin of 4.72%. Tenable Holdings's return on equity of -9.69% beat ePlus's return on equity of 11.36%.

Tenable Holdings has a consensus price target of $48.15, signalling upside risk potential of 36.91%. On the other hand ePlus has an analysts' consensus of $81.00 which suggests that it could grow by 32.14%. Given that Tenable Holdings has higher upside potential than ePlus, analysts believe Tenable Holdings is more attractive than ePlus.

Tenable Holdings has a beta of 0.885, which suggesting that the stock is 11.462% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ePlus has a beta of 1.115, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.524%.

Tenable Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ePlus offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tenable Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ePlus pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Tenable Holdings quarterly revenues are $235.7M, which are smaller than ePlus quarterly revenues of $511M. Tenable Holdings's net income of $1.9M is lower than ePlus's net income of $24.1M. Notably, Tenable Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ePlus's PE ratio is 15.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tenable Holdings is 4.64x versus 0.77x for ePlus. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SolarWinds has a net margin of 0.79% compared to Tenable Holdings's net margin of 34.55%. Tenable Holdings's return on equity of -9.69% beat SolarWinds's return on equity of 8.23%.

Tenable Holdings has a consensus price target of $48.15, signalling upside risk potential of 36.91%. On the other hand SolarWinds has an analysts' consensus of $17.14 which suggests that it could fall by -7.03%. Given that Tenable Holdings has higher upside potential than SolarWinds, analysts believe Tenable Holdings is more attractive than SolarWinds.

Tenable Holdings has a beta of 0.885, which suggesting that the stock is 11.462% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SolarWinds has a beta of 0.918, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.246%.

Tenable Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SolarWinds offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. Tenable Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SolarWinds pays out 150.28% of its earnings as a dividend.

Tenable Holdings quarterly revenues are $235.7M, which are larger than SolarWinds quarterly revenues of $210.3M. Tenable Holdings's net income of $1.9M is lower than SolarWinds's net income of $72.7M. Notably, Tenable Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SolarWinds's PE ratio is 29.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tenable Holdings is 4.64x versus 4.03x for SolarWinds. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WEX has a net margin of 0.79% compared to Tenable Holdings's net margin of 10.04%. Tenable Holdings's return on equity of -9.69% beat WEX's return on equity of 18.11%.

Tenable Holdings has a consensus price target of $48.15, signalling upside risk potential of 36.91%. On the other hand WEX has an analysts' consensus of $169.24 which suggests that it could grow by 5.17%. Given that Tenable Holdings has higher upside potential than WEX, analysts believe Tenable Holdings is more attractive than WEX.

Tenable Holdings has a beta of 0.885, which suggesting that the stock is 11.462% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WEX has a beta of 1.330, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.954%.

Tenable Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. WEX offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tenable Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. WEX pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Tenable Holdings quarterly revenues are $235.7M, which are smaller than WEX quarterly revenues of $636.5M. Tenable Holdings's net income of $1.9M is lower than WEX's net income of $63.9M. Notably, Tenable Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while WEX's PE ratio is 21.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tenable Holdings is 4.64x versus 2.53x for WEX. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.