PANW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

ServiceNow has a net margin of 11.84% compared to Palo Alto Networks's net margin of 12.99%. Palo Alto Networks's return on equity of 23.87% beat ServiceNow's return on equity of 16.46%.

Palo Alto Networks has a consensus price target of $214.33, signalling upside risk potential of 24.06%. On the other hand ServiceNow has an analysts' consensus of $1,132.91 which suggests that it could grow by 42.01%. Given that ServiceNow has higher upside potential than Palo Alto Networks, analysts believe ServiceNow is more attractive than Palo Alto Networks.

Palo Alto Networks has a beta of 1.045, which suggesting that the stock is 4.483% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ServiceNow has a beta of 1.032, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.249%.

Palo Alto Networks has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ServiceNow offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Palo Alto Networks pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ServiceNow pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Palo Alto Networks quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are smaller than ServiceNow quarterly revenues of $3B. Palo Alto Networks's net income of $267.3M is lower than ServiceNow's net income of $384M. Notably, Palo Alto Networks's price-to-earnings ratio is 97.33x while ServiceNow's PE ratio is 116.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Palo Alto Networks is 14.29x versus 15.14x for ServiceNow. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PagerDuty has a net margin of 11.84% compared to Palo Alto Networks's net margin of -7.21%. Palo Alto Networks's return on equity of 23.87% beat PagerDuty's return on equity of -25.94%.

Palo Alto Networks has a consensus price target of $214.33, signalling upside risk potential of 24.06%. On the other hand PagerDuty has an analysts' consensus of $20.73 which suggests that it could grow by 10.43%. Given that Palo Alto Networks has higher upside potential than PagerDuty, analysts believe Palo Alto Networks is more attractive than PagerDuty.

Palo Alto Networks has a beta of 1.045, which suggesting that the stock is 4.483% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PagerDuty has a beta of 1.123, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.273%.

Palo Alto Networks has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. PagerDuty offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Palo Alto Networks pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PagerDuty pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Palo Alto Networks quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are larger than PagerDuty quarterly revenues of $121.4M. Palo Alto Networks's net income of $267.3M is higher than PagerDuty's net income of -$8.8M. Notably, Palo Alto Networks's price-to-earnings ratio is 97.33x while PagerDuty's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Palo Alto Networks is 14.29x versus 3.69x for PagerDuty. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SolarWinds has a net margin of 11.84% compared to Palo Alto Networks's net margin of 34.55%. Palo Alto Networks's return on equity of 23.87% beat SolarWinds's return on equity of 8.23%.

Palo Alto Networks has a consensus price target of $214.33, signalling upside risk potential of 24.06%. On the other hand SolarWinds has an analysts' consensus of $17.14 which suggests that it could fall by -6.98%. Given that Palo Alto Networks has higher upside potential than SolarWinds, analysts believe Palo Alto Networks is more attractive than SolarWinds.

Palo Alto Networks has a beta of 1.045, which suggesting that the stock is 4.483% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SolarWinds has a beta of 0.972, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.769%.

Palo Alto Networks has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SolarWinds offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. Palo Alto Networks pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SolarWinds pays out 150.28% of its earnings as a dividend.

Palo Alto Networks quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are larger than SolarWinds quarterly revenues of $210.3M. Palo Alto Networks's net income of $267.3M is higher than SolarWinds's net income of $72.7M. Notably, Palo Alto Networks's price-to-earnings ratio is 97.33x while SolarWinds's PE ratio is 29.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Palo Alto Networks is 14.29x versus 4.03x for SolarWinds. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tenable Holdings has a net margin of 11.84% compared to Palo Alto Networks's net margin of 0.79%. Palo Alto Networks's return on equity of 23.87% beat Tenable Holdings's return on equity of -9.69%.

Palo Alto Networks has a consensus price target of $214.33, signalling upside risk potential of 24.06%. On the other hand Tenable Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $48.56 which suggests that it could grow by 38.97%. Given that Tenable Holdings has higher upside potential than Palo Alto Networks, analysts believe Tenable Holdings is more attractive than Palo Alto Networks.

Palo Alto Networks has a beta of 1.045, which suggesting that the stock is 4.483% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tenable Holdings has a beta of 0.869, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.059%.

Palo Alto Networks has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tenable Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Palo Alto Networks pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tenable Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Palo Alto Networks quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are larger than Tenable Holdings quarterly revenues of $235.7M. Palo Alto Networks's net income of $267.3M is higher than Tenable Holdings's net income of $1.9M. Notably, Palo Alto Networks's price-to-earnings ratio is 97.33x while Tenable Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Palo Alto Networks is 14.29x versus 4.61x for Tenable Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.