KULR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Amphenol has a net margin of -62.9% compared to KULR Technology Group's net margin of 14.97%. KULR Technology Group's return on equity of -852.31% beat Amphenol's return on equity of 25.08%.

KULR Technology Group has a consensus price target of $2.88, signalling upside risk potential of 21.52%. On the other hand Amphenol has an analysts' consensus of $77.09 which suggests that it could grow by 8.37%. Given that KULR Technology Group has higher upside potential than Amphenol, analysts believe KULR Technology Group is more attractive than Amphenol.

KULR Technology Group has a beta of 1.293, which suggesting that the stock is 29.318% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Amphenol has a beta of 1.239, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.905%.

KULR Technology Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Amphenol offers a yield of 0.77% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. KULR Technology Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Amphenol pays out 25.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Amphenol's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

KULR Technology Group quarterly revenues are $3.2M, which are smaller than Amphenol quarterly revenues of $4B. KULR Technology Group's net income of -$2M is lower than Amphenol's net income of $604.4M. Notably, KULR Technology Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Amphenol's PE ratio is 40.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for KULR Technology Group is 57.61x versus 6.29x for Amphenol. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NVIDIA has a net margin of -62.9% compared to KULR Technology Group's net margin of 55.04%. KULR Technology Group's return on equity of -852.31% beat NVIDIA's return on equity of 126.43%.

KULR Technology Group has a consensus price target of $2.88, signalling upside risk potential of 21.52%. On the other hand NVIDIA has an analysts' consensus of $172.80 which suggests that it could grow by 15.64%. Given that KULR Technology Group has higher upside potential than NVIDIA, analysts believe KULR Technology Group is more attractive than NVIDIA.

KULR Technology Group has a beta of 1.293, which suggesting that the stock is 29.318% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NVIDIA has a beta of 1.643, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 64.285%.

KULR Technology Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NVIDIA offers a yield of 0.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. KULR Technology Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA pays out 1.33% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

KULR Technology Group quarterly revenues are $3.2M, which are smaller than NVIDIA quarterly revenues of $35.1B. KULR Technology Group's net income of -$2M is lower than NVIDIA's net income of $19.3B. Notably, KULR Technology Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NVIDIA's PE ratio is 58.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for KULR Technology Group is 57.61x versus 32.80x for NVIDIA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Optical Cable has a net margin of -62.9% compared to KULR Technology Group's net margin of 1.92%. KULR Technology Group's return on equity of -852.31% beat Optical Cable's return on equity of -18.95%.

KULR Technology Group has a consensus price target of $2.88, signalling upside risk potential of 21.52%. On the other hand Optical Cable has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that KULR Technology Group has higher upside potential than Optical Cable, analysts believe KULR Technology Group is more attractive than Optical Cable.

KULR Technology Group has a beta of 1.293, which suggesting that the stock is 29.318% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Optical Cable has a beta of 0.307, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.283%.

KULR Technology Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Optical Cable offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. KULR Technology Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Optical Cable pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

KULR Technology Group quarterly revenues are $3.2M, which are smaller than Optical Cable quarterly revenues of $19.5M. KULR Technology Group's net income of -$2M is lower than Optical Cable's net income of $373.5K. Notably, KULR Technology Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Optical Cable's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for KULR Technology Group is 57.61x versus 0.55x for Optical Cable. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rigetti Computing has a net margin of -62.9% compared to KULR Technology Group's net margin of -623.76%. KULR Technology Group's return on equity of -852.31% beat Rigetti Computing's return on equity of -51.99%.

KULR Technology Group has a consensus price target of $2.88, signalling upside risk potential of 21.52%. On the other hand Rigetti Computing has an analysts' consensus of $3.50 which suggests that it could fall by -82.06%. Given that KULR Technology Group has higher upside potential than Rigetti Computing, analysts believe KULR Technology Group is more attractive than Rigetti Computing.

KULR Technology Group has a beta of 1.293, which suggesting that the stock is 29.318% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rigetti Computing has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

KULR Technology Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rigetti Computing offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. KULR Technology Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rigetti Computing pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

KULR Technology Group quarterly revenues are $3.2M, which are larger than Rigetti Computing quarterly revenues of $2.4M. KULR Technology Group's net income of -$2M is higher than Rigetti Computing's net income of -$14.8M. Notably, KULR Technology Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Rigetti Computing's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for KULR Technology Group is 57.61x versus 267.64x for Rigetti Computing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.