NVDA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Advanced Micro Devices has a net margin of 56.17% compared to NVIDIA's net margin of 6.29%. NVIDIA's return on equity of 123.32% beat Advanced Micro Devices's return on equity of 2.9%.

NVIDIA has a consensus price target of $164.29, signalling upside risk potential of 48%. On the other hand Advanced Micro Devices has an analysts' consensus of $135.64 which suggests that it could grow by 40.35%. Given that NVIDIA has higher upside potential than Advanced Micro Devices, analysts believe NVIDIA is more attractive than Advanced Micro Devices.

NVIDIA has a beta of 1.959, which suggesting that the stock is 95.871% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Advanced Micro Devices has a beta of 1.887, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.664%.

NVIDIA has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.04%. Advanced Micro Devices offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NVIDIA pays 1.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Advanced Micro Devices pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

NVIDIA quarterly revenues are $39.3B, which are larger than Advanced Micro Devices quarterly revenues of $7.7B. NVIDIA's net income of $22.1B is higher than Advanced Micro Devices's net income of $482M. Notably, NVIDIA's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.78x while Advanced Micro Devices's PE ratio is 97.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NVIDIA is 21.10x versus 6.13x for Advanced Micro Devices. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Intel has a net margin of 56.17% compared to NVIDIA's net margin of -6.48%. NVIDIA's return on equity of 123.32% beat Intel's return on equity of -17.53%.

NVIDIA has a consensus price target of $164.29, signalling upside risk potential of 48%. On the other hand Intel has an analysts' consensus of $21.85 which suggests that it could grow by 8.98%. Given that NVIDIA has higher upside potential than Intel, analysts believe NVIDIA is more attractive than Intel.

NVIDIA has a beta of 1.959, which suggesting that the stock is 95.871% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intel has a beta of 1.129, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.94%.

NVIDIA has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.04%. Intel offers a yield of 2.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. NVIDIA pays 1.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Intel pays out -8.53% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

NVIDIA quarterly revenues are $39.3B, which are larger than Intel quarterly revenues of $12.7B. NVIDIA's net income of $22.1B is higher than Intel's net income of -$821M. Notably, NVIDIA's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.78x while Intel's PE ratio is 95.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NVIDIA is 21.10x versus 1.63x for Intel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

KLA has a net margin of 56.17% compared to NVIDIA's net margin of 26.8%. NVIDIA's return on equity of 123.32% beat KLA's return on equity of 96.34%.

NVIDIA has a consensus price target of $164.29, signalling upside risk potential of 48%. On the other hand KLA has an analysts' consensus of $794.97 which suggests that it could grow by 14.45%. Given that NVIDIA has higher upside potential than KLA, analysts believe NVIDIA is more attractive than KLA.

NVIDIA has a beta of 1.959, which suggesting that the stock is 95.871% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KLA has a beta of 1.370, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.998%.

NVIDIA has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.04%. KLA offers a yield of 0.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.70 per share. NVIDIA pays 1.14% of its earnings as a dividend. KLA pays out 27.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

NVIDIA quarterly revenues are $39.3B, which are larger than KLA quarterly revenues of $3.1B. NVIDIA's net income of $22.1B is higher than KLA's net income of $824.5M. Notably, NVIDIA's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.78x while KLA's PE ratio is 29.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NVIDIA is 21.10x versus 8.65x for KLA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lattice Semiconductor has a net margin of 56.17% compared to NVIDIA's net margin of 14.06%. NVIDIA's return on equity of 123.32% beat Lattice Semiconductor's return on equity of 8.76%.

NVIDIA has a consensus price target of $164.29, signalling upside risk potential of 48%. On the other hand Lattice Semiconductor has an analysts' consensus of $64.74 which suggests that it could grow by 32.01%. Given that NVIDIA has higher upside potential than Lattice Semiconductor, analysts believe NVIDIA is more attractive than Lattice Semiconductor.

NVIDIA has a beta of 1.959, which suggesting that the stock is 95.871% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lattice Semiconductor has a beta of 1.636, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.603%.

NVIDIA has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.04%. Lattice Semiconductor offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NVIDIA pays 1.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Lattice Semiconductor pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

NVIDIA quarterly revenues are $39.3B, which are larger than Lattice Semiconductor quarterly revenues of $117.4M. NVIDIA's net income of $22.1B is higher than Lattice Semiconductor's net income of $16.5M. Notably, NVIDIA's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.78x while Lattice Semiconductor's PE ratio is 111.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NVIDIA is 21.10x versus 13.32x for Lattice Semiconductor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.