APH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Isomet has a net margin of 14.97% compared to Amphenol's net margin of --. Amphenol's return on equity of 25.08% beat Isomet's return on equity of --.

Amphenol has a consensus price target of $77.09, signalling upside risk potential of 9.97%. On the other hand Isomet has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Amphenol has higher upside potential than Isomet, analysts believe Amphenol is more attractive than Isomet.

Amphenol has a beta of 1.239, which suggesting that the stock is 23.905% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Isomet has a beta of 0.793, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.671%.

Amphenol has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.79%. Isomet offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Amphenol pays 25.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Isomet pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Amphenol's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Amphenol quarterly revenues are $4B, which are larger than Isomet quarterly revenues of --. Amphenol's net income of $604.4M is higher than Isomet's net income of --. Notably, Amphenol's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.29x while Isomet's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amphenol is 6.19x versus -- for Isomet. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

KULR Technology Group has a net margin of 14.97% compared to Amphenol's net margin of -62.9%. Amphenol's return on equity of 25.08% beat KULR Technology Group's return on equity of -852.31%.

Amphenol has a consensus price target of $77.09, signalling upside risk potential of 9.97%. On the other hand KULR Technology Group has an analysts' consensus of $2.88 which suggests that it could grow by 27.01%. Given that KULR Technology Group has higher upside potential than Amphenol, analysts believe KULR Technology Group is more attractive than Amphenol.

Amphenol has a beta of 1.239, which suggesting that the stock is 23.905% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KULR Technology Group has a beta of 1.293, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.318%.

Amphenol has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.79%. KULR Technology Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Amphenol pays 25.97% of its earnings as a dividend. KULR Technology Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Amphenol's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Amphenol quarterly revenues are $4B, which are larger than KULR Technology Group quarterly revenues of $3.2M. Amphenol's net income of $604.4M is higher than KULR Technology Group's net income of -$2M. Notably, Amphenol's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.29x while KULR Technology Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amphenol is 6.19x versus 55.11x for KULR Technology Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Novanta has a net margin of 14.97% compared to Amphenol's net margin of 7.85%. Amphenol's return on equity of 25.08% beat Novanta's return on equity of 8.73%.

Amphenol has a consensus price target of $77.09, signalling upside risk potential of 9.97%. On the other hand Novanta has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 8.41%. Given that Amphenol has higher upside potential than Novanta, analysts believe Amphenol is more attractive than Novanta.

Amphenol has a beta of 1.239, which suggesting that the stock is 23.905% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Novanta has a beta of 1.281, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.111%.

Amphenol has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.79%. Novanta offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Amphenol pays 25.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Novanta pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Amphenol's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Amphenol quarterly revenues are $4B, which are larger than Novanta quarterly revenues of $244.4M. Amphenol's net income of $604.4M is higher than Novanta's net income of $19.2M. Notably, Amphenol's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.29x while Novanta's PE ratio is 91.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amphenol is 6.19x versus 5.95x for Novanta. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Optical Cable has a net margin of 14.97% compared to Amphenol's net margin of 1.92%. Amphenol's return on equity of 25.08% beat Optical Cable's return on equity of -18.95%.

Amphenol has a consensus price target of $77.09, signalling upside risk potential of 9.97%. On the other hand Optical Cable has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Amphenol has higher upside potential than Optical Cable, analysts believe Amphenol is more attractive than Optical Cable.

Amphenol has a beta of 1.239, which suggesting that the stock is 23.905% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Optical Cable has a beta of 0.307, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.283%.

Amphenol has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.79%. Optical Cable offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Amphenol pays 25.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Optical Cable pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Amphenol's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Amphenol quarterly revenues are $4B, which are larger than Optical Cable quarterly revenues of $19.5M. Amphenol's net income of $604.4M is higher than Optical Cable's net income of $373.5K. Notably, Amphenol's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.29x while Optical Cable's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amphenol is 6.19x versus 0.55x for Optical Cable. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.