NOVT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Isomet has a net margin of 7.85% compared to Novanta's net margin of --. Novanta's return on equity of 8.73% beat Isomet's return on equity of --.

Novanta has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 9.31%. On the other hand Isomet has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Novanta has higher upside potential than Isomet, analysts believe Novanta is more attractive than Isomet.

Novanta has a beta of 1.281, which suggesting that the stock is 28.111% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Isomet has a beta of 0.793, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.671%.

Novanta has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Isomet offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Novanta pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Isomet pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Novanta quarterly revenues are $244.4M, which are larger than Isomet quarterly revenues of --. Novanta's net income of $19.2M is higher than Isomet's net income of --. Notably, Novanta's price-to-earnings ratio is 90.81x while Isomet's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Novanta is 5.90x versus -- for Isomet. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

KULR Technology Group has a net margin of 7.85% compared to Novanta's net margin of -62.9%. Novanta's return on equity of 8.73% beat KULR Technology Group's return on equity of -852.31%.

Novanta has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 9.31%. On the other hand KULR Technology Group has an analysts' consensus of $2.88 which suggests that it could grow by 21.52%. Given that KULR Technology Group has higher upside potential than Novanta, analysts believe KULR Technology Group is more attractive than Novanta.

Novanta has a beta of 1.281, which suggesting that the stock is 28.111% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KULR Technology Group has a beta of 1.293, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.318%.

Novanta has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. KULR Technology Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Novanta pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. KULR Technology Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Novanta quarterly revenues are $244.4M, which are larger than KULR Technology Group quarterly revenues of $3.2M. Novanta's net income of $19.2M is higher than KULR Technology Group's net income of -$2M. Notably, Novanta's price-to-earnings ratio is 90.81x while KULR Technology Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Novanta is 5.90x versus 57.61x for KULR Technology Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Optical Cable has a net margin of 7.85% compared to Novanta's net margin of 1.92%. Novanta's return on equity of 8.73% beat Optical Cable's return on equity of -18.95%.

Novanta has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 9.31%. On the other hand Optical Cable has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Novanta has higher upside potential than Optical Cable, analysts believe Novanta is more attractive than Optical Cable.

Novanta has a beta of 1.281, which suggesting that the stock is 28.111% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Optical Cable has a beta of 0.307, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.283%.

Novanta has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Optical Cable offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Novanta pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Optical Cable pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Novanta quarterly revenues are $244.4M, which are larger than Optical Cable quarterly revenues of $19.5M. Novanta's net income of $19.2M is higher than Optical Cable's net income of $373.5K. Notably, Novanta's price-to-earnings ratio is 90.81x while Optical Cable's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Novanta is 5.90x versus 0.55x for Optical Cable. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vicor has a net margin of 7.85% compared to Novanta's net margin of 12.4%. Novanta's return on equity of 8.73% beat Vicor's return on equity of 0.85%.

Novanta has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 9.31%. On the other hand Vicor has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -9.81%. Given that Novanta has higher upside potential than Vicor, analysts believe Novanta is more attractive than Vicor.

Novanta has a beta of 1.281, which suggesting that the stock is 28.111% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vicor has a beta of 1.498, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.751%.

Novanta has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Vicor offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Novanta pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Vicor pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Novanta quarterly revenues are $244.4M, which are larger than Vicor quarterly revenues of $93.2M. Novanta's net income of $19.2M is higher than Vicor's net income of $11.6M. Notably, Novanta's price-to-earnings ratio is 90.81x while Vicor's PE ratio is 572.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Novanta is 5.90x versus 6.51x for Vicor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.