DOOO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Luminar Technologies has a net margin of -10.45% compared to BRP's net margin of -196.68%. BRP's return on equity of -36.54% beat Luminar Technologies's return on equity of --.

BRP has a consensus price target of $47.58, signalling upside risk potential of 34.56%. On the other hand Luminar Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $22.40 which suggests that it could grow by 342.69%. Given that Luminar Technologies has higher upside potential than BRP, analysts believe Luminar Technologies is more attractive than BRP.

BRP has a beta of 1.717, which suggesting that the stock is 71.731% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Luminar Technologies has a beta of 1.865, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 86.529%.

BRP has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.71%. Luminar Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BRP pays -29.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Luminar Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

BRP quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Luminar Technologies quarterly revenues of $22.5M. BRP's net income of -$153.7M is lower than Luminar Technologies's net income of -$44.2M. Notably, BRP's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.34x while Luminar Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BRP is 0.46x versus 2.12x for Luminar Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Miller Industries has a net margin of -10.45% compared to BRP's net margin of 4.75%. BRP's return on equity of -36.54% beat Miller Industries's return on equity of 16.83%.

BRP has a consensus price target of $47.58, signalling upside risk potential of 34.56%. On the other hand Miller Industries has an analysts' consensus of $70.50 which suggests that it could grow by 77.09%. Given that Miller Industries has higher upside potential than BRP, analysts believe Miller Industries is more attractive than BRP.

BRP has a beta of 1.717, which suggesting that the stock is 71.731% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Miller Industries has a beta of 1.141, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.095%.

BRP has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.71%. Miller Industries offers a yield of 1.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. BRP pays -29.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Miller Industries pays out 13.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Miller Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BRP quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Miller Industries quarterly revenues of $221.9M. BRP's net income of -$153.7M is lower than Miller Industries's net income of $10.5M. Notably, BRP's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.34x while Miller Industries's PE ratio is 7.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BRP is 0.46x versus 0.37x for Miller Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vision Marine Technologies has a net margin of -10.45% compared to BRP's net margin of -1119.66%. BRP's return on equity of -36.54% beat Vision Marine Technologies's return on equity of -231.49%.

BRP has a consensus price target of $47.58, signalling upside risk potential of 34.56%. On the other hand Vision Marine Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $234.56 which suggests that it could grow by 52293.64%. Given that Vision Marine Technologies has higher upside potential than BRP, analysts believe Vision Marine Technologies is more attractive than BRP.

BRP has a beta of 1.717, which suggesting that the stock is 71.731% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vision Marine Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

BRP has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.71%. Vision Marine Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BRP pays -29.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Vision Marine Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

BRP quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Vision Marine Technologies quarterly revenues of $103.5K. BRP's net income of -$153.7M is lower than Vision Marine Technologies's net income of -$1.2M. Notably, BRP's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.34x while Vision Marine Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BRP is 0.46x versus 0.06x for Vision Marine Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Worksport has a net margin of -10.45% compared to BRP's net margin of -132.43%. BRP's return on equity of -36.54% beat Worksport's return on equity of -87.2%.

BRP has a consensus price target of $47.58, signalling upside risk potential of 34.56%. On the other hand Worksport has an analysts' consensus of $11.00 which suggests that it could grow by 255.99%. Given that Worksport has higher upside potential than BRP, analysts believe Worksport is more attractive than BRP.

BRP has a beta of 1.717, which suggesting that the stock is 71.731% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Worksport has a beta of 2.074, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 107.355%.

BRP has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.71%. Worksport offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BRP pays -29.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Worksport pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

BRP quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Worksport quarterly revenues of $3.1M. BRP's net income of -$153.7M is lower than Worksport's net income of -$4.1M. Notably, BRP's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.34x while Worksport's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BRP is 0.46x versus 1.01x for Worksport. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.