DMN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

EV Technology Group has a net margin of -12833.85% compared to Damon's net margin of --. Damon's return on equity of -- beat EV Technology Group's return on equity of --.

Damon has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand EV Technology Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Damon has higher upside potential than EV Technology Group, analysts believe Damon is more attractive than EV Technology Group.

Damon has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EV Technology Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Damon has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. EV Technology Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Damon pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. EV Technology Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Damon quarterly revenues are $80.3K, which are larger than EV Technology Group quarterly revenues of --. Damon's net income of -$10.3M is higher than EV Technology Group's net income of --. Notably, Damon's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while EV Technology Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Damon is -- versus -- for EV Technology Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Faraday Future Intelligent Electric has a net margin of -12833.85% compared to Damon's net margin of --. Damon's return on equity of -- beat Faraday Future Intelligent Electric's return on equity of --.

Damon has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Faraday Future Intelligent Electric has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 8495476.07%. Given that Faraday Future Intelligent Electric has higher upside potential than Damon, analysts believe Faraday Future Intelligent Electric is more attractive than Damon.

Damon has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Faraday Future Intelligent Electric has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Damon has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Faraday Future Intelligent Electric offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Damon pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Faraday Future Intelligent Electric pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Damon quarterly revenues are $80.3K, which are larger than Faraday Future Intelligent Electric quarterly revenues of --. Damon's net income of -$10.3M is higher than Faraday Future Intelligent Electric's net income of --. Notably, Damon's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Faraday Future Intelligent Electric's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Damon is -- versus 14.24x for Faraday Future Intelligent Electric. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vision Marine Technologies has a net margin of -12833.85% compared to Damon's net margin of -1119.66%. Damon's return on equity of -- beat Vision Marine Technologies's return on equity of -231.49%.

Damon has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Vision Marine Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $234.56 which suggests that it could grow by 51538.08%. Given that Vision Marine Technologies has higher upside potential than Damon, analysts believe Vision Marine Technologies is more attractive than Damon.

Damon has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vision Marine Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Damon has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Vision Marine Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Damon pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Vision Marine Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Damon quarterly revenues are $80.3K, which are smaller than Vision Marine Technologies quarterly revenues of $103.5K. Damon's net income of -$10.3M is lower than Vision Marine Technologies's net income of -$1.2M. Notably, Damon's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Vision Marine Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Damon is -- versus 0.07x for Vision Marine Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Workhorse Group has a net margin of -12833.85% compared to Damon's net margin of -1001.53%. Damon's return on equity of -- beat Workhorse Group's return on equity of -170.46%.

Damon has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Workhorse Group has an analysts' consensus of $2.00 which suggests that it could grow by 579.35%. Given that Workhorse Group has higher upside potential than Damon, analysts believe Workhorse Group is more attractive than Damon.

Damon has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Workhorse Group has a beta of 2.987, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 198.662%.

Damon has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Workhorse Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Damon pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Workhorse Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Damon quarterly revenues are $80.3K, which are smaller than Workhorse Group quarterly revenues of $2.5M. Damon's net income of -$10.3M is higher than Workhorse Group's net income of -$25.1M. Notably, Damon's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Workhorse Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Damon is -- versus 0.29x for Workhorse Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.