VLO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

HF Sinclair has a net margin of 1.11% compared to Valero Energy's net margin of -1.05%. Valero Energy's return on equity of 13.03% beat HF Sinclair's return on equity of 3.23%.

Valero Energy has a consensus price target of $149.39, signalling upside risk potential of 25.91%. On the other hand HF Sinclair has an analysts' consensus of $49.23 which suggests that it could grow by 44.25%. Given that HF Sinclair has higher upside potential than Valero Energy, analysts believe HF Sinclair is more attractive than Valero Energy.

Valero Energy has a beta of 1.397, which suggesting that the stock is 39.739% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison HF Sinclair has a beta of 1.197, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.691%.

Valero Energy has a quarterly dividend of $1.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.61%. HF Sinclair offers a yield of 5.86% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Valero Energy pays 16.44% of its earnings as a dividend. HF Sinclair pays out 21.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Valero Energy quarterly revenues are $32.9B, which are larger than HF Sinclair quarterly revenues of $7.2B. Valero Energy's net income of $364M is higher than HF Sinclair's net income of -$75.9M. Notably, Valero Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.64x while HF Sinclair's PE ratio is 21.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Valero Energy is 0.29x versus 0.22x for HF Sinclair. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marathon Petroleum has a net margin of 1.11% compared to Valero Energy's net margin of 1.77%. Valero Energy's return on equity of 13.03% beat Marathon Petroleum's return on equity of 15.31%.

Valero Energy has a consensus price target of $149.39, signalling upside risk potential of 25.91%. On the other hand Marathon Petroleum has an analysts' consensus of $168.84 which suggests that it could grow by 26.53%. Given that Marathon Petroleum has higher upside potential than Valero Energy, analysts believe Marathon Petroleum is more attractive than Valero Energy.

Valero Energy has a beta of 1.397, which suggesting that the stock is 39.739% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marathon Petroleum has a beta of 1.396, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.569%.

Valero Energy has a quarterly dividend of $1.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.61%. Marathon Petroleum offers a yield of 2.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share. Valero Energy pays 16.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Marathon Petroleum pays out 13.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Valero Energy quarterly revenues are $32.9B, which are smaller than Marathon Petroleum quarterly revenues of $35.1B. Valero Energy's net income of $364M is lower than Marathon Petroleum's net income of $622M. Notably, Valero Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.64x while Marathon Petroleum's PE ratio is 10.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Valero Energy is 0.29x versus 0.34x for Marathon Petroleum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PBF Energy has a net margin of 1.11% compared to Valero Energy's net margin of -3.41%. Valero Energy's return on equity of 13.03% beat PBF Energy's return on equity of -4.5%.

Valero Energy has a consensus price target of $149.39, signalling upside risk potential of 25.91%. On the other hand PBF Energy has an analysts' consensus of $30.23 which suggests that it could grow by 19.02%. Given that Valero Energy has higher upside potential than PBF Energy, analysts believe Valero Energy is more attractive than PBF Energy.

Valero Energy has a beta of 1.397, which suggesting that the stock is 39.739% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PBF Energy has a beta of 1.575, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.485%.

Valero Energy has a quarterly dividend of $1.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.61%. PBF Energy offers a yield of 4.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Valero Energy pays 16.44% of its earnings as a dividend. PBF Energy pays out 5.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Valero Energy quarterly revenues are $32.9B, which are larger than PBF Energy quarterly revenues of $8.4B. Valero Energy's net income of $364M is higher than PBF Energy's net income of -$285.9M. Notably, Valero Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.64x while PBF Energy's PE ratio is 5.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Valero Energy is 0.29x versus 0.09x for PBF Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Phillips 66 has a net margin of 1.11% compared to Valero Energy's net margin of 0.97%. Valero Energy's return on equity of 13.03% beat Phillips 66's return on equity of 10.89%.

Valero Energy has a consensus price target of $149.39, signalling upside risk potential of 25.91%. On the other hand Phillips 66 has an analysts' consensus of $141.58 which suggests that it could grow by 28.15%. Given that Phillips 66 has higher upside potential than Valero Energy, analysts believe Phillips 66 is more attractive than Valero Energy.

Valero Energy has a beta of 1.397, which suggesting that the stock is 39.739% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Phillips 66 has a beta of 1.350, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.962%.

Valero Energy has a quarterly dividend of $1.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.61%. Phillips 66 offers a yield of 4.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.15 per share. Valero Energy pays 16.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Phillips 66 pays out 26.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Valero Energy quarterly revenues are $32.9B, which are smaller than Phillips 66 quarterly revenues of $35.5B. Valero Energy's net income of $364M is higher than Phillips 66's net income of $346M. Notably, Valero Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.64x while Phillips 66's PE ratio is 14.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Valero Energy is 0.29x versus 0.32x for Phillips 66. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.