COP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Diamondback Energy has a net margin of 16.2% compared to ConocoPhillips's net margin of 29.06%. ConocoPhillips's return on equity of 17.57% beat Diamondback Energy's return on equity of 12.58%.

ConocoPhillips has a consensus price target of $129.11, signalling upside risk potential of 30.48%. On the other hand Diamondback Energy has an analysts' consensus of $207.04 which suggests that it could grow by 37.84%. Given that Diamondback Energy has higher upside potential than ConocoPhillips, analysts believe Diamondback Energy is more attractive than ConocoPhillips.

ConocoPhillips has a beta of 1.119, which suggesting that the stock is 11.901% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Diamondback Energy has a beta of 1.849, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 84.902%.

ConocoPhillips has a quarterly dividend of $0.78 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.15%. Diamondback Energy offers a yield of 3.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. ConocoPhillips pays 39.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamondback Energy pays out 47.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ConocoPhillips quarterly revenues are $14.2B, which are larger than Diamondback Energy quarterly revenues of $3.7B. ConocoPhillips's net income of $2.3B is higher than Diamondback Energy's net income of $1.1B. Notably, ConocoPhillips's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.70x while Diamondback Energy's PE ratio is 9.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ConocoPhillips is 2.13x versus 2.91x for Diamondback Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marathon Petroleum has a net margin of 16.2% compared to ConocoPhillips's net margin of 1.12%. ConocoPhillips's return on equity of 17.57% beat Marathon Petroleum's return on equity of 12.35%.

ConocoPhillips has a consensus price target of $129.11, signalling upside risk potential of 30.48%. On the other hand Marathon Petroleum has an analysts' consensus of $166.26 which suggests that it could grow by 17.79%. Given that ConocoPhillips has higher upside potential than Marathon Petroleum, analysts believe ConocoPhillips is more attractive than Marathon Petroleum.

ConocoPhillips has a beta of 1.119, which suggesting that the stock is 11.901% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marathon Petroleum has a beta of 1.394, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.425%.

ConocoPhillips has a quarterly dividend of $0.78 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.15%. Marathon Petroleum offers a yield of 2.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share. ConocoPhillips pays 39.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Marathon Petroleum pays out 33.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ConocoPhillips quarterly revenues are $14.2B, which are smaller than Marathon Petroleum quarterly revenues of $33.1B. ConocoPhillips's net income of $2.3B is higher than Marathon Petroleum's net income of $371M. Notably, ConocoPhillips's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.70x while Marathon Petroleum's PE ratio is 14.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ConocoPhillips is 2.13x versus 0.35x for Marathon Petroleum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Occidental Petroleum has a net margin of 16.2% compared to ConocoPhillips's net margin of -1.88%. ConocoPhillips's return on equity of 17.57% beat Occidental Petroleum's return on equity of 9.38%.

ConocoPhillips has a consensus price target of $129.11, signalling upside risk potential of 30.48%. On the other hand Occidental Petroleum has an analysts' consensus of $59.70 which suggests that it could grow by 28.3%. Given that ConocoPhillips has higher upside potential than Occidental Petroleum, analysts believe ConocoPhillips is more attractive than Occidental Petroleum.

ConocoPhillips has a beta of 1.119, which suggesting that the stock is 11.901% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Occidental Petroleum has a beta of 1.512, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.174%.

ConocoPhillips has a quarterly dividend of $0.78 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.15%. Occidental Petroleum offers a yield of 1.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. ConocoPhillips pays 39.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Occidental Petroleum pays out 47.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ConocoPhillips quarterly revenues are $14.2B, which are larger than Occidental Petroleum quarterly revenues of $6.8B. ConocoPhillips's net income of $2.3B is higher than Occidental Petroleum's net income of -$127M. Notably, ConocoPhillips's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.70x while Occidental Petroleum's PE ratio is 19.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ConocoPhillips is 2.13x versus 1.68x for Occidental Petroleum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Phillips 66 has a net margin of 16.2% compared to ConocoPhillips's net margin of 0.02%. ConocoPhillips's return on equity of 17.57% beat Phillips 66's return on equity of 7%.

ConocoPhillips has a consensus price target of $129.11, signalling upside risk potential of 30.48%. On the other hand Phillips 66 has an analysts' consensus of $138.92 which suggests that it could grow by 9.62%. Given that ConocoPhillips has higher upside potential than Phillips 66, analysts believe ConocoPhillips is more attractive than Phillips 66.

ConocoPhillips has a beta of 1.119, which suggesting that the stock is 11.901% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Phillips 66 has a beta of 1.309, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.884%.

ConocoPhillips has a quarterly dividend of $0.78 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.15%. Phillips 66 offers a yield of 3.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.15 per share. ConocoPhillips pays 39.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Phillips 66 pays out 88.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ConocoPhillips quarterly revenues are $14.2B, which are smaller than Phillips 66 quarterly revenues of $33.7B. ConocoPhillips's net income of $2.3B is higher than Phillips 66's net income of $8M. Notably, ConocoPhillips's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.70x while Phillips 66's PE ratio is 25.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ConocoPhillips is 2.13x versus 0.37x for Phillips 66. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.