PH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Flowserve has a net margin of 14.24% compared to Parker Hannifin's net margin of 5.15%. Parker Hannifin's return on equity of 24.73% beat Flowserve's return on equity of 13.38%.

Parker Hannifin has a consensus price target of $741.41, signalling upside risk potential of 13.61%. On the other hand Flowserve has an analysts' consensus of $68.80 which suggests that it could grow by 17.71%. Given that Flowserve has higher upside potential than Parker Hannifin, analysts believe Flowserve is more attractive than Parker Hannifin.

Parker Hannifin has a beta of 1.436, which suggesting that the stock is 43.595% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flowserve has a beta of 1.414, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.437%.

Parker Hannifin has a quarterly dividend of $1.63 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.98%. Flowserve offers a yield of 1.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. Parker Hannifin pays 27.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Flowserve pays out 56.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Parker Hannifin quarterly revenues are $4.9B, which are larger than Flowserve quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Parker Hannifin's net income of $698.4M is higher than Flowserve's net income of $58.4M. Notably, Parker Hannifin's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.47x while Flowserve's PE ratio is 28.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Parker Hannifin is 4.26x versus 1.70x for Flowserve. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Graham has a net margin of 14.24% compared to Parker Hannifin's net margin of 6.13%. Parker Hannifin's return on equity of 24.73% beat Graham's return on equity of 7.3%.

Parker Hannifin has a consensus price target of $741.41, signalling upside risk potential of 13.61%. On the other hand Graham has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 13.62%. Given that Graham has higher upside potential than Parker Hannifin, analysts believe Graham is more attractive than Parker Hannifin.

Parker Hannifin has a beta of 1.436, which suggesting that the stock is 43.595% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Graham has a beta of 0.726, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.359%.

Parker Hannifin has a quarterly dividend of $1.63 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.98%. Graham offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Parker Hannifin pays 27.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Graham pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Parker Hannifin's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Parker Hannifin quarterly revenues are $4.9B, which are larger than Graham quarterly revenues of $53.6M. Parker Hannifin's net income of $698.4M is higher than Graham's net income of $3.3M. Notably, Parker Hannifin's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.47x while Graham's PE ratio is 61.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Parker Hannifin is 4.26x versus 2.45x for Graham. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ingersoll Rand has a net margin of 14.24% compared to Parker Hannifin's net margin of 11.91%. Parker Hannifin's return on equity of 24.73% beat Ingersoll Rand's return on equity of 8.43%.

Parker Hannifin has a consensus price target of $741.41, signalling upside risk potential of 13.61%. On the other hand Ingersoll Rand has an analysts' consensus of $108.72 which suggests that it could grow by 17.72%. Given that Ingersoll Rand has higher upside potential than Parker Hannifin, analysts believe Ingersoll Rand is more attractive than Parker Hannifin.

Parker Hannifin has a beta of 1.436, which suggesting that the stock is 43.595% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ingersoll Rand has a beta of 1.419, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.92%.

Parker Hannifin has a quarterly dividend of $1.63 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.98%. Ingersoll Rand offers a yield of 0.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. Parker Hannifin pays 27.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Ingersoll Rand pays out 4.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Parker Hannifin quarterly revenues are $4.9B, which are larger than Ingersoll Rand quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Parker Hannifin's net income of $698.4M is higher than Ingersoll Rand's net income of $221.6M. Notably, Parker Hannifin's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.47x while Ingersoll Rand's PE ratio is 45.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Parker Hannifin is 4.26x versus 5.26x for Ingersoll Rand. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RBC Bearings has a net margin of 14.24% compared to Parker Hannifin's net margin of 13.62%. Parker Hannifin's return on equity of 24.73% beat RBC Bearings's return on equity of 8.13%.

Parker Hannifin has a consensus price target of $741.41, signalling upside risk potential of 13.61%. On the other hand RBC Bearings has an analysts' consensus of $338.20 which suggests that it could grow by 11.02%. Given that Parker Hannifin has higher upside potential than RBC Bearings, analysts believe Parker Hannifin is more attractive than RBC Bearings.

Parker Hannifin has a beta of 1.436, which suggesting that the stock is 43.595% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RBC Bearings has a beta of 1.548, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.815%.

Parker Hannifin has a quarterly dividend of $1.63 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.98%. RBC Bearings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Parker Hannifin pays 27.5% of its earnings as a dividend. RBC Bearings pays out 10.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Parker Hannifin quarterly revenues are $4.9B, which are larger than RBC Bearings quarterly revenues of $397.9M. Parker Hannifin's net income of $698.4M is higher than RBC Bearings's net income of $54.2M. Notably, Parker Hannifin's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.47x while RBC Bearings's PE ratio is 44.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Parker Hannifin is 4.26x versus 5.60x for RBC Bearings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.