IR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Coda Octopus Group has a net margin of 12.1% compared to Ingersoll Rand's net margin of 17.53%. Ingersoll Rand's return on equity of 8.32% beat Coda Octopus Group's return on equity of 7.55%.

Ingersoll Rand has a consensus price target of $99.95, signalling upside risk potential of 23.45%. On the other hand Coda Octopus Group has an analysts' consensus of $8.00 which suggests that it could grow by 19.58%. Given that Ingersoll Rand has higher upside potential than Coda Octopus Group, analysts believe Ingersoll Rand is more attractive than Coda Octopus Group.

Ingersoll Rand has a beta of 1.477, which suggesting that the stock is 47.669% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coda Octopus Group has a beta of 0.599, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.094%.

Ingersoll Rand has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.1%. Coda Octopus Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ingersoll Rand pays 3.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Coda Octopus Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ingersoll Rand's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ingersoll Rand quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are larger than Coda Octopus Group quarterly revenues of $5.2M. Ingersoll Rand's net income of $229.8M is higher than Coda Octopus Group's net income of $913K. Notably, Ingersoll Rand's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.30x while Coda Octopus Group's PE ratio is 19.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ingersoll Rand is 4.56x versus 3.59x for Coda Octopus Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lennox International has a net margin of 12.1% compared to Ingersoll Rand's net margin of 14.7%. Ingersoll Rand's return on equity of 8.32% beat Lennox International's return on equity of 142.28%.

Ingersoll Rand has a consensus price target of $99.95, signalling upside risk potential of 23.45%. On the other hand Lennox International has an analysts' consensus of $613.89 which suggests that it could grow by 7.79%. Given that Ingersoll Rand has higher upside potential than Lennox International, analysts believe Ingersoll Rand is more attractive than Lennox International.

Ingersoll Rand has a beta of 1.477, which suggesting that the stock is 47.669% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lennox International has a beta of 1.133, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.296%.

Ingersoll Rand has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.1%. Lennox International offers a yield of 0.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.15 per share. Ingersoll Rand pays 3.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Lennox International pays out 19.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ingersoll Rand quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are larger than Lennox International quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Ingersoll Rand's net income of $229.8M is higher than Lennox International's net income of $197.7M. Notably, Ingersoll Rand's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.30x while Lennox International's PE ratio is 25.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ingersoll Rand is 4.56x versus 3.82x for Lennox International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Trane Technologies PLC has a net margin of 12.1% compared to Ingersoll Rand's net margin of 12.4%. Ingersoll Rand's return on equity of 8.32% beat Trane Technologies PLC's return on equity of 35.67%.

Ingersoll Rand has a consensus price target of $99.95, signalling upside risk potential of 23.45%. On the other hand Trane Technologies PLC has an analysts' consensus of $402.37 which suggests that it could grow by 15.91%. Given that Ingersoll Rand has higher upside potential than Trane Technologies PLC, analysts believe Ingersoll Rand is more attractive than Trane Technologies PLC.

Ingersoll Rand has a beta of 1.477, which suggesting that the stock is 47.669% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Trane Technologies PLC has a beta of 1.124, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.428%.

Ingersoll Rand has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.1%. Trane Technologies PLC offers a yield of 1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.94 per share. Ingersoll Rand pays 3.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Trane Technologies PLC pays out 29.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ingersoll Rand quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are smaller than Trane Technologies PLC quarterly revenues of $4.9B. Ingersoll Rand's net income of $229.8M is lower than Trane Technologies PLC's net income of $604.3M. Notably, Ingersoll Rand's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.30x while Trane Technologies PLC's PE ratio is 30.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ingersoll Rand is 4.56x versus 4.00x for Trane Technologies PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Watts Water Technologies has a net margin of 12.1% compared to Ingersoll Rand's net margin of 12.51%. Ingersoll Rand's return on equity of 8.32% beat Watts Water Technologies's return on equity of 18.03%.

Ingersoll Rand has a consensus price target of $99.95, signalling upside risk potential of 23.45%. On the other hand Watts Water Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $218.67 which suggests that it could grow by 5.66%. Given that Ingersoll Rand has higher upside potential than Watts Water Technologies, analysts believe Ingersoll Rand is more attractive than Watts Water Technologies.

Ingersoll Rand has a beta of 1.477, which suggesting that the stock is 47.669% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Watts Water Technologies has a beta of 0.934, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.554%.

Ingersoll Rand has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.1%. Watts Water Technologies offers a yield of 0.83% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share. Ingersoll Rand pays 3.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Watts Water Technologies pays out 19.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ingersoll Rand quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are larger than Watts Water Technologies quarterly revenues of $540.4M. Ingersoll Rand's net income of $229.8M is higher than Watts Water Technologies's net income of $67.6M. Notably, Ingersoll Rand's price-to-earnings ratio is 39.30x while Watts Water Technologies's PE ratio is 23.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ingersoll Rand is 4.56x versus 3.08x for Watts Water Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.