CLIR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Chicago Rivet & Machine has a net margin of -62.13% compared to ClearSign Technologies's net margin of -20.76%. ClearSign Technologies's return on equity of -54.96% beat Chicago Rivet & Machine's return on equity of -13.89%.

ClearSign Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 682.98%. On the other hand Chicago Rivet & Machine has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ClearSign Technologies has higher upside potential than Chicago Rivet & Machine, analysts believe ClearSign Technologies is more attractive than Chicago Rivet & Machine.

ClearSign Technologies has a beta of 1.039, which suggesting that the stock is 3.902% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chicago Rivet & Machine has a beta of 0.100, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 89.973%.

ClearSign Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Chicago Rivet & Machine offers a yield of 1.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. ClearSign Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Chicago Rivet & Machine pays out -14.05% of its earnings as a dividend.

ClearSign Technologies quarterly revenues are $1.9M, which are smaller than Chicago Rivet & Machine quarterly revenues of $7M. ClearSign Technologies's net income of -$1.2M is higher than Chicago Rivet & Machine's net income of -$1.4M. Notably, ClearSign Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Chicago Rivet & Machine's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ClearSign Technologies is 8.03x versus 0.44x for Chicago Rivet & Machine. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ingersoll Rand has a net margin of -62.13% compared to ClearSign Technologies's net margin of 12.1%. ClearSign Technologies's return on equity of -54.96% beat Ingersoll Rand's return on equity of 8.32%.

ClearSign Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 682.98%. On the other hand Ingersoll Rand has an analysts' consensus of $99.95 which suggests that it could grow by 21.55%. Given that ClearSign Technologies has higher upside potential than Ingersoll Rand, analysts believe ClearSign Technologies is more attractive than Ingersoll Rand.

ClearSign Technologies has a beta of 1.039, which suggesting that the stock is 3.902% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ingersoll Rand has a beta of 1.477, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.669%.

ClearSign Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ingersoll Rand offers a yield of 0.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. ClearSign Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ingersoll Rand pays out 3.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Ingersoll Rand's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ClearSign Technologies quarterly revenues are $1.9M, which are smaller than Ingersoll Rand quarterly revenues of $1.9B. ClearSign Technologies's net income of -$1.2M is lower than Ingersoll Rand's net income of $229.8M. Notably, ClearSign Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ingersoll Rand's PE ratio is 39.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ClearSign Technologies is 8.03x versus 4.63x for Ingersoll Rand. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tel Instrument Electronics has a net margin of -62.13% compared to ClearSign Technologies's net margin of -15.36%. ClearSign Technologies's return on equity of -54.96% beat Tel Instrument Electronics's return on equity of -13.77%.

ClearSign Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 682.98%. On the other hand Tel Instrument Electronics has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ClearSign Technologies has higher upside potential than Tel Instrument Electronics, analysts believe ClearSign Technologies is more attractive than Tel Instrument Electronics.

ClearSign Technologies has a beta of 1.039, which suggesting that the stock is 3.902% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tel Instrument Electronics has a beta of 0.606, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.413%.

ClearSign Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tel Instrument Electronics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ClearSign Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tel Instrument Electronics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ClearSign Technologies quarterly revenues are $1.9M, which are smaller than Tel Instrument Electronics quarterly revenues of $3M. ClearSign Technologies's net income of -$1.2M is lower than Tel Instrument Electronics's net income of -$456.5K. Notably, ClearSign Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Tel Instrument Electronics's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ClearSign Technologies is 8.03x versus 0.94x for Tel Instrument Electronics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Watts Water Technologies has a net margin of -62.13% compared to ClearSign Technologies's net margin of 12.51%. ClearSign Technologies's return on equity of -54.96% beat Watts Water Technologies's return on equity of 18.03%.

ClearSign Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 682.98%. On the other hand Watts Water Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $218.67 which suggests that it could grow by 5.66%. Given that ClearSign Technologies has higher upside potential than Watts Water Technologies, analysts believe ClearSign Technologies is more attractive than Watts Water Technologies.

ClearSign Technologies has a beta of 1.039, which suggesting that the stock is 3.902% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Watts Water Technologies has a beta of 0.934, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.554%.

ClearSign Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Watts Water Technologies offers a yield of 0.83% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share. ClearSign Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Watts Water Technologies pays out 19.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Watts Water Technologies's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ClearSign Technologies quarterly revenues are $1.9M, which are smaller than Watts Water Technologies quarterly revenues of $540.4M. ClearSign Technologies's net income of -$1.2M is lower than Watts Water Technologies's net income of $67.6M. Notably, ClearSign Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Watts Water Technologies's PE ratio is 23.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ClearSign Technologies is 8.03x versus 3.08x for Watts Water Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.